Abstract:Purpose. Philosophy of culture is an extremely multifaceted field, which includes the anthropological segment as well. In particular, we can talk about the role of man (personality) in cultural progress in a particular period of development of the society. To some extent, this problem may also apply to the theory of archetypes, which is rapidly developing today, being used not only in philosophy but also in other fields, deeply penetrated into the methodology of humanities knowledge. Therefore, we used interdisciplinary tools for this study. The purpose of this work is to study the influence of personality on the development of Ukrainian culture in a global, comprehensive dimension, based on the experience and works of famous figures that carried out cultural activities in a certain historical period. In this case, we can appeal to the archetype of the Wise Old Man, which contains a set of permanent features (ordinary and transcendent) that connect its projections with both the "foretype" and at the same time the "accumulation" of experience. Theoretical basis. Based on the work of famous researchers in the field of philosophy, anthropology, analytical psychology, ethnophilosophy (C. Jung, Z. Freud, M. Scheler, F. Nietzsche, F. Schelling, W. Eco, G. Gachev, A. Bolshakova, L. Koshetarova, M. Eliade, O. Kyryliuk, S. Krymsky, V. Lychkovakh, T. Shestopalova, M. Nesteleev, Z. Bosyk, etc.), the authors note the insufficient elaboration of the topic regarding the distinction of anthropological (including anthropocentric) dimensions of different cultural periods of Ukraine in chronological order. Originality. The authors of the article prove that the continuity of the accumulation of anthropocentric features in individuals gives them transcendence, elevate to the archetype of the Wise Old Man, which can be perceived as a universal process against the ethnic development background. Conclusions. As a result of the study, we can say that the role of individual key figures in the development of national culture is quite noticeable. This can be traced both at the local level and at the national level, when we should talk about individuals who in a certain period of development of society and culture were leading and became a kind of embodiment of universal experience accumulated in an individual with a certain identity, which is the "personality" required in "that place" and "that time". For this reason, we turn to the archetype of the Wise Old Man as an "invariant", a "conductor", which reflects the most realized and individualized personality in a particular chronotope.

Reconsidering the "Uznadze Effect" and psychology of set (Gantskoba) from a systemic cultural psychological perspective

“Systematic Semiotic Organisation and Anthropologisation of the Science of Soul – Towards Cultural Psychology”

Epistemological and Methodological Issues Related to the New Challenges of a Cultural–Historical-Based Psychology

(Re)Introducing Vygotsky’s Thought: From Historical Overview to Contemporary Psychology

Vygotsky's Crisis: Argument, context, relevance

On the psycho-social conditions of psychotherapy in post-Soviet Georgia

The Anthropological Dimension of the Pygmalion Effect

Idealism, materialism, and Vygotsky's cultural historical theory

The idea of self-regulation in Russian psychology

Cultural psychology as a theoretical project / La psicología cultural como proyecto teórico

The Nature of stage Transformation as a Problem (L.S. Vygotsky's virtual dialogue with a modern theater psychologist)

EVOLUTION OF ETHNIC IDENTITY IN MULTINATIONAL RUSSIAN REPUBLICS AS EVALUAT ED BY FOREIGN POLITICAL SCIENTISTS: FROM "SOVIETNESS" TO POST-SOVIET DEVELOPMENT (on the example of Bashkortostan, Tatarstan and Buryatia)

THE PROBLEM OF THE TRANSITION FROM “NAIVE” TO SCIENTIFIC CONCEPTS: CONCEPTUAL CHANGE APPROACH AND VYGOTSKY’S COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT THEORY

Inching Toward a Unified Metatheory for Psychology

Personality as a Social Process: where Peter Giordano Meets Boris Parygin

Vygotsky and Psychology as Normative Science

Seeking for the Definition of “Culture”: Current Concerns and their Implications. A Comment on Gustav Jahoda’s Article “Critical Reflections on some Recent Definitions of “Culture’”’

Heuristic Potential of Concepts by G. Hofstede and A.A. Auzan for Studying Binarity of Culture in Armenia and Russia

Culture and Attention: Future Directions to Expand Research Beyond the Geographical Regions of WEIRD Cultures

THE CENTURY-OLD TREND OF "DE-ECONOMIZATION" OF RUSSIAN HUMAN GEOGRAPHY: DETERMINANTS, CONSEQUENCES, WAYS OF OVERCOMING

ANTHROPOCENTRIC DIMENSIONS OF UKRAINIAN CULTURE (IN THE CONTEXT OF THE ARCHETYPE OF THE WISE OLD MAN)