Costs to Implement a Pediatric Weight Management Program Across 3 Distinct Contexts

Natalie Riva Smith,Meg Simione,Haley Farrar-Muir,Jazmin Granadeno,Jennifer W Moreland,Jessica Wallace,Holly M Frost,Jackie Young,Cassie Craddock,Kerry Sease,Simon J Hambidge,Elsie M Taveras,Douglas E Levy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000001891
2023-10-01
Abstract:Background: The Connect for Health program is an evidence-based program that aligns with national recommendations for pediatric weight management and includes clinical decision support, educational handouts, and community resources. As implementation costs are a major driver of program adoption and maintenance decisions, we assessed the costs to implement the Connect for Health program across 3 health systems that primarily serve low-income communities with a high prevalence of childhood obesity. Methods: We used time-driven activity-based costing methods. Each health system (site) developed a process map and a detailed report of all implementation actions taken, aligned with major implementation requirements (eg, electronic health record integration) or strategies (eg, providing clinician training). For each action, sites identified the personnel involved and estimated the time they spent, allowing us to estimate the total costs of implementation and breakdown costs by major implementation activities. Results: Process maps indicated that the program integrated easily into well-child visits. Overall implementation costs ranged from $77,103 (Prisma Health) to $84,954 (Denver Health) to $142,721 (Massachusetts General Hospital). Across implementation activities, setting up the technological aspects of the program was a major driver of costs. Other cost drivers included training, engaging stakeholders, and audit and feedback activities, though there was variability across systems based on organizational context and implementation choices. Conclusions: Our work highlights the major cost drivers of implementing the Connect for Health program. Accounting for context-specific considerations when assessing the costs of implementation is crucial, especially to facilitate accurate projections of implementation costs in future settings.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?