Abstract:Abstract There has been an increasing role in the use of injectable fillers for rejuvenation of the aging face. In this systematic review, we aim to evaluate the existing literature related to soft tissue fillers of the midface. Specifically, we focus on the non-hyaluronic acid fillers including polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), poly-L-lactic acid (PLLA), calcium hydroxyapatite (CaHA), and autologous fat. A systematic review was conducted in November 2020 in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines with PubMed and Embase databases. Medical Subject Headings terms used were “cheek” OR “midface” OR “malar” and “filler” OR “poly-L-lactic acid” OR “calcium hydroxyapatite,” “autologous fat” OR “polymethylmethacrylate” OR “Artefill” OR “Bellafill” OR “Radiesse” OR “Sculptra.” The initial search identified 271 articles. After 145 duplicates were removed, 126 studies were screened for relevance by title and abstract. A total of 114 studies were eliminated based on inclusion and exclusion criteria. Twelve articles underwent full-text review. Seven articles were included in the final analysis consisting of four non-hyaluronic filler products: PMMA, PLLA, CaHA, autologous fat. Most patients were highly satisfied with their results. Due to the gradual volumizing effects of PMMA, PLLA, and CaHA, patient satisfaction generally improved over time. Minor adverse reactions related to treatment included bruising, swelling, and pain. Nodule formation was reported in PLLA and CaHA studies. For autologous fat, 32% of the original injection volume remained at 16 months post-treatment, which still provided clinically improved malar enhancement. Dermal fillers are an attractive treatment option for the aging face due to their high patient satisfaction, long-lasting effects, and low side-effect profile. Patients should be appropriately counseled on the delayed effects of non-HA fillers. Autologous fat is a good option in many patients with the major drawback of unpredictable longevity, which may require a secondary procedure. Future studies should examine the longevity and long-term side effects of these fillers.

Fillers Around the Nose

Depth of the subcutaneous tissue in the nose: Application to filler injection

Nasal Filling in Plastic Surgery Practice: Primary Nasal Filling, Nasal Filling for Post-rhinoplasty Defects, Rhinoplasty After Hyaluronidase Injection in Dissatisfied Nasal Filling Patients

Vasculature of the Nasal Cartilage Region Related to Filler Injection

Nose Tip Elongation and Elevation: A Novel Filler Injection Technique

Permanent Facial Fillers: Addressing Complications and Advancing Solutions

Nonsurgical Rhinoplasty: An Updated Systematic Review of Technique, Outcomes, Complications, and Its Treatments

Injectable soft-tissue fillers: clinical overview

Treatment strategy of the complication caused by fillers in rhinoplasty

Treatment of Delayed Hypersensitivity After Injection of Nasal Fillers

An overview of permanent and semipermanent fillers

An Innovative Approach for Nasal Reshaping using Hyaluronic Acid Intradermal Injections

Injectable fillers: review of material and properties

Surgery for Foreign Body Reactions due to Injectable Fillers

Microinjection Technique: A Novel and Comprehensive Approach for Nose Reshaping with Hyaluronic Acid Fillers

Volumizing Fillers for Skin: Selection Strategies

Collagen-Containing Fillers: Alone and in Combination

In Vitro Cytocompatibility Analysis and Comparison of Different Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Minimally Invasive Esthetics

Efficacy and Safety of Fillers for the Treatment of Nasolabial Folds: A Network meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Non-Hyaluronic Acid Fillers for Midface Augmentation: A Systematic Review

Nonsurgical Correction of Surgical Rhinoplasty Complications with Hyaluronic Acid Fillers: A Retrospective Review of 2088 Cases