[Role of pituitary gland in diabetes mellitus].

H. Imura,M. Yawata,J. Endo,T. Morita,K. Hirakawa

1967-02-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Long-term survival in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with different immune checkpoint inhibitors in multiple-line therapies: A case report and literature review

Xu Zhang,Jiabin Zheng,Yun Niu,Chongxiang Xue,Yixuan Yu,Kexin Tan,Huijuan Cui

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2022.1059331

IF: 7.3

2022-11-30

Frontiers in Immunology

Abstract:Background: Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is highly malignant, is highly prone to recurrence, and has a short survival period. It is very difficult to achieve long-term survival in ES-SCLC, which has not been significantly improved in the last 20 years. For a long time, platinum-based chemotherapy has occupied the core position in the treatment of small-cell lung cancer (SCLC), but there are few options for treatment drugs or regimens, and if disease progression occurs, the options for follow-up regimens are obviously limited. The advent of immunotherapy has changed this situation to some extent, and immunotherapy has shown some effects in improving efficiency and prolonging survival, whether in first- or third-line therapy, but it is still unsatisfactory. Case presentation: A 57-year-old patient with ES-SCLC experienced disease progression after four lines of treatment including synchronous radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and antiangiogenesis. However, the patient still benefited when switching to the programmed cell death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitor toripalimab in combination with chemotherapy in the fifth line. Even after the development of immune resistance, the patient still benefited after switching to tislelizumab in combination with different chemotherapy regimens or alone in the sixth and seventh lines. Following the progression of tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy, the patient again profited after switching to durvalumab in combination with anlotinib and again achieved a progressive-free survival (PFS) of 11 months. Overall, the patient achieved a total of 45 months of PFS and 50 months of overall survival (OS), with a shocking and exciting 30 months of PFS achieved in the immune combination phase alone. Conclusion: We report a patient with ES-SCLC who achieved long-term survival after at least eight lines of therapy including chemotherapy, antiangiogenesis, and different immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This suggests that long-term survival in SCLC is possible with aggressive, combined, and standardized treatment. Otherwise, immunotherapy postline enablement can still benefit patients, rechallenge after immune resistance is also possible in SCLC, and combination with chemotherapy or antiangiogenic therapy can improve the efficacy and prolong the survival. This will provide new ideas and options for the selection of treatment options for SCLC.

immunology
Durable Response to Atezolizumab in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Leading to 60 Months Overall Survival: A Case Report

Freeman Paczkowski,Jacques Raphael,Claire Browne

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31070271

2024-06-27

Abstract:Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains a disease with poor prognosis, particularly in extensive-stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). Current standard-of-care treatment includes chemotherapy with platinum agents and etoposide plus immunotherapy with atezolizumab or durvalumab, which has achieved a mean overall survival of 12-13 months in clinical trials. However, long-term survival in ES-SCLC, even with the addition of immunotherapy, continues to be rare. We present the case of a middle-aged male patient diagnosed with ES-SCLC who was treated with four cycles of induction chemotherapy (carboplatin and etoposide) and atezolizumab, starting maintenance atezolizumab every 21 days thereafter, and thoracic radiotherapy. After 9 months, he experienced mild disease progression and was rechallenged with six cycles of carboplatin and etoposide with continued atezolizumab. Subsequent imaging showed near-complete disease resolution which has been sustained since. He has continued on maintenance atezolizumab since diagnosis and has achieved 60 months overall survival and 44 months progression-free survival. Throughout treatment, he has maintained a high functional capacity and only experienced one immune-related adverse event. Our patient is representative of a small subset who are capable of achieving durable responses to immunotherapy and his case highlights the need for further research to elucidate the clinical and biological factors driving this response.
Efficacy and Safety of PD-L1 Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

Jingjing Qu,Farhin Shaheed Kalyani,Qian Shen,Guangdie Yang,Tianli Cheng,Li Liu,Jianya Zhou,Jianying Zhou

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3645489

IF: 4.501

2022-01-01

Journal of Oncology

Abstract:Background. Most patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) have extensive-stage (ES) disease with a poor prognosis. Immunotherapy has shown good therapeutic effects in the treatment of ES-SCLC. We performed a real-world retrospective study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC. Method. A total of 224 patients diagnosed with ES-SCLC between March 2017 and April 2021 were included, of which 115 received only etoposide-platinum (EP) chemotherapy,and 109 received programmed cell-death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors and EP. Results. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus platinum were associated with a significant improvement in overall survival (OS), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.60 (95% CI, 0.42–0.85; P = 0.0054 ); median OS was 19 months in the ICIs plus EP group vs. 12 months in the EP group. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 8.5 and 5.0 months, respectively (HR for disease progression or death, 0.42; 95% CI, 0.31–0.57; P < 0.0001 ). Male patients <65 years old, Stage IV, PS 0-1, without liver and brain metastasis had a better OS in the ICIs plus EP group than the EP group. The PFS and OS in the durvalumab plus chemotherapy group were insignificantly longer than that of the atezolizumab plus chemotherapy group. Any adverse effects (AEs) of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 50 patients (45.9%) in the ICIs plus EP group and 48 patients (41.7%) in the EP alone group. The most common immune-related AEs (irAEs) were immune hypothyroidism events (17.1%, 7/41), immune dermatitis (9.8%, 4/41), and immune pneumonia (9.8%, 4/41) in the durvalumab plus platinum-etoposide group. Immune liver insufficiency (10.3%, 7/68) and immune hypothyroidism (8.8%, 6/68) were the most common irAEs in the atezolizumab plus platinum-etoposide group. Conclusion. This study shows that adding PD-L1 inhibitors to chemotherapy can significantly improve PFS and OS in patients with ES-SCLC and demonstrates its safety without additional AEs.
IMpower150 Final Overall Survival Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in First-Line Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC.

Mark A. Socinski,Makoto Nishio,Robert M. Jotte,Federico Cappuzzo,Francisco Orlandi,Daniil Stroyakovskiy,Naoyuki Nogami,Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu,Denis Moro-Sibilot,Christian A. Thomas,Fabrice Barlesi,Gene Finley,Shengchun Kong,Anthony Lee,Shelley Coleman,Wei Zou,Mark McCleland,Geetha Shankar,Martin Reck

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtho.2021.07.009

IF: 20.121

2021-01-01

Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract:Introduction: We report the final overall survival (OS) analyses of atezolizumab-carboplatin-paclitaxel (ACP [experimental arm]) and OS data with approximately 39.8 months of median follow-up with atezolizumab-bevacizumabcarboplatin-paclitaxel (ABCP) versus bevacizumabcarboplatin-paclitaxel (BCP) in chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC in the phase 3 IMpower150 study (NCT02366143). Methods: In this randomized, open-label study (N = 1202), coprimary end points included investigator-assessed progression-free survival and OS in intention-to-treat (ITT) wild type (WT; no EGFR or ALK alterations) patients. Secondary and exploratory end points included OS in ITT and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) subgroups defined by the VENTANA SP142 and SP263 immunohistochemistry assays. Results: At the final analysis with ACP versus BCP (data cutoff: September 13, 2019; minimum follow-up: 32.4 mo), ACP had numerical, but not statistically significant, improvements in OS (ITT-WT: median OS = 19.0 versus 14.7 mo; hazard ratio = 0.84; 95% confidence interval: 0.71-1.00). OS benefit was sustained with ABCP versus BCP (ITT-WT: 19.5 versus 14.7 mo; hazard ratio = 0.80; 95% confidence interval: 0.67-0.95). Exploratory analyses in the SP142-defined PD-L1 subgroups revealed longer median OS with ABCP and ACP versus BCP in PD-L1-high and PD-L1-positive subgroups; in the PD-L1-negative subgroups, median OS was similar with ACP and ABCP versus BCP. Safety was consistent with that in earlier analyses (data cutoff: January 22, 2018). Conclusions: At the final IMpower150 OS analysis, ACP had numerical, but not statistically significant, OS improvement versus BCP. Updated data with an additional 20 months of follow-up revealed continued OS improvement with ABCP versus BCP in all patients. (c) 2021 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
Five-year survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab in the Phase III IMpower133 study and the Phase III IMbrella A extension study

Martin Reck,Rafal Dziadziuszko,Shunichi Sugawara,Steven Kao,Maximilian Hochmair,Florian Huemer,Gilberto de Castro Jr,Libor Havel,Reyes Bernabé Caro,György Losonczy,Jong-Seok Lee,Dariusz M Kowalski,Zoran Andric,Raffaele Califano,Andrea Veatch,Gregory Gerstner,Marta Batus,Stefanie Morris,Monika Kaul,Vaikunth Cuchelkar,Huafei Li,Bradford J Danner,Barzin Y Nabet,Stephen V Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107924

IF: 6.081

Lung Cancer

Abstract:Objectives: IMbrella A is a Phase III extension study that allowed rollover from Roche/Genentech-sponsored atezolizumab trials, including IMpower133, a Phase I/III trial of first-line atezolizumab or placebo plus carboplatin/etoposide in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. We report outcomes from an exploratory analysis of IMpower133 with extended time-to-event data for patients who rolled over to IMbrella A. Materials and methods: IMpower133 patients could roll over to IMbrella A to receive atezolizumab 1200 mg intravenously every three weeks if they continued to receive atezolizumab at IMpower133 closure or were in survival follow-up after atezolizumab discontinuation. Overall survival and safety were assessed; only serious adverse events and AEs of special interest were collected in IMbrella A. Results: Eighteen of 26 eligible patients rolled over to IMbrella A. At clinical cutoff (March 16, 2023), median follow-up in the atezolizumab plus carboplatin/etoposide arm (IMpower133 and IMbrella A) was 59.4 months. The three-, four-, and five-year overall survival (95 % CI) estimates were 16 % (11 %-21 %), 13 % (8 %-18 %), and 12 % (7 %-17 %), respectively. In IMbrella A, serious adverse events occurred in three patients (16.7 %), and one adverse event of special interest was reported (grade two hypothyroidism). Conclusion: This long-term analysis of patients from IMbrella A previously enrolled in IMpower133 provides the first report of five-year overall survival outcomes in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with first-line cancer immunotherapy and chemotherapy. While limited by small patient numbers and lack of long-term data for the IMpower133 control arm, exploratory overall survival analyses in patients treated with atezolizumab plus carboplatin/etoposide compared favorably with historical data with chemotherapy alone. NCT03148418.
Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in patients receiving atezolizumab plus carboplatin–etoposide: stratification of outcome based on a composite score that combines gene expression profiling and immune characterization of microenvironment

Anna Tosi,Martina Lorenzi,Paola Del Bianco,Anna Roma,Alberto Pavan,Antonio Scapinello,Maria Vittoria Resi,Laura Bonanno,Stefano Frega,Fiorella Calabrese,Valentina Guarneri,Antonio Rosato,Giulia Pasello

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/jitc-2024-008974

IF: 12.469

2024-07-01

Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer

Abstract:Purpose Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive disease with a dismal prognosis. The addition of immune checkpoints inhibitors to standard platinum-based chemotherapy in first-line setting achieves a durable benefit only in a patient subgroup. Thus, the identification of predictive biomarkers is an urgent unmet medical need. Experimental design Tumor samples from naive extensive-stage (ES) SCLC patients receiving atezolizumab plus carboplatin–etoposide were analyzed by gene expression profiling and two 9-color multiplex immunofluorescence panels, to characterize the immune infiltrate and SCLC subtypes. Associations of tissue biomarkers with time-to-treatment failure (TTF), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), were assessed. Results 42 patients were included. Higher expression of exhausted CD8-related genes was independently associated with a longer TTF and PFS while increased density of B lymphocytes correlated with longer TTF and OS. Higher percentage of M2-like macrophages close to tumor cells and of CD8+T cells close to CD4+T lymphocytes correlated with increased risk of TF and longer survival, respectively. A lower risk of TF, disease progression and death was associated with a higher density of ASCL1+tumor cells while the expression of POU2F3 correlated with a shorter survival. A composite score combining the expression of exhausted CD8-related genes, B lymphocyte density, ASCL1 tumor expression and quantification of CD163+macrophages close to tumor cells, was able to stratify patients into high-risk and low-risk groups. Conclusions In conclusion, we identified tissue biomarkers and a combined score that can predict a higher benefit from chemoimmunotherapy in ES-SCLC patients.

oncology,immunology
Efficacy and safety analysis of anlotinib combined with etoposide plus cisplatin/carboplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC): The final results from a phase II single-arm trial.

Tiandong Kong,Lu Chen,Fangfang Duan,Xiaoxia Hou,Liuyan Wang,Hanli Zhou,Lanrong Wang,Shanshan Hu,Danna Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.8560

IF: 45.3

2021-05-20

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:8560 Background: In recent years, the therapeutic regimens of extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) have progressed a lot. The most significant clinical studies include IMpower133 and CASPIAN. However, the relevant results showed that the combination of PD-L1 monoclonal antibody and EC regimen chemotherapy as first-line treatment of small cell lung cancer have a median PFS (progession-free survival) of about 5 months, which is comparable to that of simple chemotherapy. Therefore, the EP/EC is still the standard treatment for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer. Meanwhile, we noticed that anlotinib (multi-target small molecule oral VEGF inhibitor) has a curative effect on patients with extensive-stage SCLC as a third-line or above treatment in the ALTER 1202 study in China. Therefore, we tried to add anlotinib to the first-line treatment with EP/EC regimen in patients with ES-SCLC to observe the efficacy and safety. Methods: Eligible ES-SCLC pts (18̃75 years old, initial treatment, no obvious heart, liver and kidney dysfunction) were received anlotinib (12mg QD from day 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle) + etoposide(100mg/m 2 , d1̃3 of a 21-day cycle)+CBP (AUC = 4̃5,d1,Q3W) or DDP (70̃75mg/m 2 , d1,Q3W) for 4̃6 cycles, then anlotinib maintenance (12mg QD from day 1 to 14 of a 21-day cycle) until the disease progresses or intolerable adverse reactions occur. During the treatment, dose reduction of anlotinib was permitted, which could be reduced to 10mg or 8mg if it was intolerable. The main observation endpoints were ORR, PFS and adverse events. Results: Between January 2019 and August 2020, a total of 20 patients with extensive-stage SCLC were enrolled in the study, with an average age of 66.2 ± 8.1(45-75) years old, 17 males (85%) and 3 females (15%). The median PFS was 10 months (95% CI: 7.809-12.191), median OS was 15 months (95%CI:10.639-19.361), ORR (objective remission rate) was 90% and DCR (disease control rate) was 100%. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events related to the trial regimen included: neutropenia was 10/20 (50.0%), thrombocytopenia was 5/20 (25.0%), anemia, nausea and fatigue were all 2/20 (10%), hypertension, transaminase elevation and hoarseness were all 1/20 (5%). Conclusions: Anlotinib combined with EP/EC regimen has better PFS, OS, ORR and DCR for the initial treatment of extensive-stage SCLC, and a manageable safety profile. A randomized, controlled phase III clinical study will be conducted to confirm this conclusion. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2000035043.

oncology
Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Immunotherapy in Extensive‐stage Small‐cell Lung Cancer Based on Real‐world Practice

Yaning Yang,Xin Ai,Haiyan Xu,Guangjian Yang,Lu Yang,Xuezhi Hao,Ke Yang,Yuling Mi,Guizhen Wang,Shuyang Zhang,Siyu Lei,Yan Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1759-7714.14684

IF: 3.223

2022-01-01

Thoracic Cancer

Abstract:Abstract Background The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) represents a breakthrough in the current landscape for the treatment of extensive‐stage small‐cell lung cancer (ES‐SCLC), but the real‐world outcome is limited. This study aimed to investigate the treatment options and efficacy evaluation of first‐line, second‐line, and subsequent‐line immunotherapy in routine practice. Methods A retrospective analysis of ES‐SCLC patients treated with ICIs was conducted between May 2016 and September 2021. Objective response rate, disease control rate, progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival were assessed between groups to explore the value of ICIs at different treatment time periods. PFS1 and PFS2 were defined as the duration from initial therapy to disease progression or death in first‐line or second‐line treatment. Results Ninety‐six patients with ES‐SCLC were included. PFS1 was prolonged in patients treated with first‐line ICIs‐combined therapy (median PFS1 7.20 months vs. 5.30 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.55, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.36–087, p = 0.0085). For patients who progressed after first‐line ICIs treatment (N = 22), PFS1 + PFS2 was longer in the second‐line ICIs continuation group with no significant difference (median PFS1 + PFS2 11.27 months vs. 7.20 months, HR 0.45, 95% CI 0.14–1.51, p = 0.19). For patients who experienced a progression event after first‐line chemotherapy (N = 50), PFS2 and PFS1 + PFS2 were prolonged in patients who accepted second‐line ICIs‐combined therapy without significant difference (median PFS2 4.00 months vs. 2.43 months, HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.33–1.05, p = 0.070; median PFS1 + PFS2 11.30 months vs. 8.70 months, HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.29–0.98, p = 0.056). Conclusion First‐line ICIs plus chemotherapy should be applied in the clinical practice of ES‐SCLC. If patients did not receive ICIs plus chemotherapy in first‐line treatment, therapies that include ICIs in second‐line treatment should be considered.
Isolation of Populations of Antipeptide Antibodies Directed against Different Epitopes of the Same Fragment

A. Chersi,Christiane Greger,R. Houghten

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/znc-1985-1-230

1985-02-01

Abstract:Abstract Rabbit antibodies against small peptides may be composed by subpopulations recognizing different epitopes made likely by few aminoacids. This explains the frequent crossreactivity of antipeptide antibodies with unrelated peptides. A suitable use of immunoadsorbents is suggested to obtain truly specific antibodies able to react with restricted amino acid sequences.
Comprehensive genomic and spatial immune infiltration analysis of survival outliers in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy

Yuxin Jiang,Jingyuan Xie,Qinpei Cheng,Zijing Cai,Ke Xu,Wanjun Lu,Fufeng Wang,Xiaoying Wu,Yong Song,Tangfeng Lv,Ping Zhan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intimp.2024.112901

2024-08-15

Abstract:Background: A minority of patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) exhibit prolonged survival following first-line chemoimmunotherapy, which warrants the use of reliable biomarkers. Here, we investigated the disparities in genomics and immune cell spatial distribution between long- and short-term survival of patients with ES-SCLC. Methods: We retrospectively recruited 11 long-term (>2 years) and 13 short-term (<9 months) ES-SCLC survivors receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy. The samples were processed using targeted next-generation sequencing (tNGS), programmed death ligand-1 staining, multiplex immunohistochemical staining for immune cells (mIHC), tumor mutation burden (TMB), and chromosomal instability score measurements. The expression of putative genes in SCLC at the bulk and single-cell RNA-sequencing levels, as well as the role of putative genes in pan-cancer immunotherapy cohorts, were analyzed. Results: At the genomic level, a greater proportion of the smoking signature and higher TMB (>3.1) were associated with favorable survival. At the single-gene and pathway levels, tNGS revealed that MCL1 and STMN1 amplification and alterations in the apoptosis pathway were more common in short-term survivors, whereas alterations in the DLL3, KMT2B, HGF, EPHA3, ADGRB3, lysine deprivation, and HGF-cMET pathways were observed more frequently in long-term survivors. mIHC analysis of immune cells with different spatial distributions revealed that long-term survivors presented increased numbers of M1-like macrophages in all locations and decreased numbers of CD8+ T cells in the tumor stroma. Bulk transcriptomic analysis demonstrated that high levels of STMN1 and DLL3 represented an immune-suppressive tumor immune microenvironment (TIME), whereas HGF indicated an immune-responsive TIME. The expression levels of our putative genes were comparative in both TP53/RB1 mutant-type and TP53/RB1 wild-type. At the single-cell level, STMN1, MCL1, and DLL3 were highly expressed among all molecular subtypes (SCLC-A, SCLC-N, and SCLC-P), with STMN1 being enriched in cell division and G2M checkpoint pathways. Conclusions: For ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy, alterations in DLL3, KMT2B, HGF, EPHA3, and ADGRB3 and a greater proportion of M1-like macrophages infiltration in all locations were predictors of favorable survival, while MCL1 and STMN1 amplification, as well as a greater proportion of CD8+ T cells infiltrating the tumor stroma, predicted worse survival.
A real-world study of anlotinib in combination with PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

Size Chen,Yiguang Lin,Minghan Song,Jiayi Dong,Shao Lijuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.e20135

IF: 45.3

2024-06-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:e20135 Background: Current first-line treatment options for extensive stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) are the PD-L1 inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy. Although these regimens have improved outcomes, most patients experience disease progression (PD), and median survival remains approximately 12 months. Anlotinib represents a tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting multiple receptor tyrosine kinases, achieved good efficacy in third-line therapy in ES-SCLC. We conducted a real-world study to explore the safety and efficacy of adding anlotinib to the current first-line therapy in ES-SCLC. Methods: This real-world study included 16 patients with ES-SCLC treated with antirotinib in combination with the PD-L1 inhibitor and etoposide and cisplatin chemotherapy at our hospital between Oct 2020 and Nov 2023. Patients received six cycles of a standard dose of the PD-L1 inhibitor (Atezolizumab; Adebrelimab; Envafolimab; Nivolumab; Pembrolizumab; Tirelizumab or Sugemalimab) in combination with cisplatin (25 mg/m 2 , day 1-3 of each cycle) and etoposide (100 mg/m 2 , day 1-3 of each cycle), and anlotinib was taken orally (4-6mg, day 1-14 of each cycle). Maintenance PD-L1 inhibitor plus anlotinib was followed in a 21-day cycle until disease progression, intolerant toxicity, or longer than 2 years of treatment. The primary outcomes were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were disease control rate (DCR), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse reactions. Treatment response and adverse events (AEs) were assessed using the RECIST 1.1 and CTCAE 5.0, respectively. Results: A total of 16 patients were recruited. The median age was 72 years (66-76). Four patients (25%) had brain metastases at baseline, and seven patients (43.8%) had liver metastases. Median PFS was 10.8 months (95% CI, 8.3-13.3 months) and the median OS was 16.4 months (95% CI, 9.6-23.2 months). Totally 15 and 1 participants showed PR and SD, respectively. ORR and DCR were 93.8% and 100%. All patients had treatment-related AEs, of which grade 3-4 AE occurred in 50% (8/16). No serious infection or treatment-related death occurred. Myelosuppression was the most common AE, such as anemia (100%), leukocytopenia (100%), lymphocytopenia (100%), neutropenia (87.5%), and thrombocytopenia (50%). Other common AEs included hypoproteinemia (68.8%); hyponatremia (62.5%); creatinine elevation (56.3%), proteinuria (43.8%); hypertension (37.5%) and hypertriglyceridemia (37.5%). No unexpected AEs were found in this study. No patient stopped treatment due to intolerable toxicity. Conclusions: The addition of anlotinib to first-line immunotherapy in combination with chemotherapy results in extended PFS and OS in patients with ES-SCLC without additional AEs. The preliminary results warrant further investigation of this treatment modality in ES-SCLC.

oncology
The control of marine propulsion plant

R. Whalley

Abstract:
Collusion-Resistant digital video watermarking for copyright protection application

A. Manaf,Ali Boroujerdizade,Seyed Mojtaba Mousavi

2016-03-01

Abstract:In this paper, a frame-by-frame blind video watermarking technique, which is resistant against collusion attack, is proposed. Collusion attack is the main problem in video watermarking for copyright protection. Whereby in this attack, colluders try to estimate and remove the watermark by comparing with as many as watermarked materials. To address the collusion attack in this work, each frame is assigned a different watermark. Since each frame has a unique watermark, it is impossible for the attack to estimate it. To achieve the required robustness as well as maintaining the quality, a combination of Block Truncation Coding (BTC), Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT) and Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) techniques is used. The results show that the proposed method is robust against all types of collusion attack, and at the same time, the quality of the video is maintained at a satisfactory level.
Abstract CT038: Adebrelimab or Placebo Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide As First-Line Treatment for Extensive-Stage SCLC: A Phase 3 Trial

Ying Cheng,Jie Wang,Caicun Zhou,Wenxiu Yao,Qiming Wang,Xuhong Min,Gongyan Chen,Xingxiang Xu,Xingya Li,Fei Xu,Yong Fang,Runxiang Yang,Guohua Yu,Youling Gong,Jun Zhao,Yun Fan,Quan Liu,Lejie Cao,Yu Yao,Yunpeng Liu,Xiaoling Li,Jingxun Wu,Zhiyong He,Kaihua Lu,Liyan Jiang,Huiqing Yu,Chengping Hu,Wenhua Zhao,Jian Zhao,Gang Wu,Dingzhi Huang,Chengshui Chen,Cuimin Ding,Baihong Zhang,Xiuwen Wang,Hui Luo,Baolan Li,Ben Zhang,Haowen Li,Ke Ma

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-ct038

IF: 11.2

2022-01-01

Cancer Research

Abstract:Introduction: Extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) is associated with limited treatment options and poor prognosis. Immunotherapy has recently showed robust clinical activity in ES-SCLC. In this double-blind, phase 3 trial, we evaluated adebrelimab (SHR-1316), a novel anti-PD-L1 antibody, in combination with standard chemotherapy (chemo) as first-line treatment for ES-SCLC. Methods: Patients naïve to systemic treatment for ES-SCLC were randomized 1:1 to receive 4-6 cycles of adebrelimab (20 mg/kg, iv, d1, q3w) or placebo with carboplatin (AUC 5, d1, q3w) plus etoposide (100 mg/m2, d1, d2, d3, q3w), followed by maintenance therapy with adebrelimab or placebo. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Results: 462 patients were randomized and treated (adebrelimab+chemo, n=230; placebo+chemo, n=232). As of Oct 08, 2021, with an median follow-up of 13.5 mo (all patients; 22.5 mo for patients alive), OS was significantly prolonged with adebrelimab+chemo vs placebo+chemo (median, 15.3 mo [95% CI 13.2-17.5] vs 12.8 mo [95% CI 11.3-13.7]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.72 [95% CI 0.58-0.90], 1-sided p=0.0017); OS rate was 62.9% vs 52.0% at 12 mo and 31.3% vs 17.2% at 24 mo. Progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review committee (IRC) was 5.8 mo (95% CI 5.6-6.9) with adebrelimab+chemo vs 5.6 mo (95% CI 5.5-5.7) with placebo+chemo (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.54-0.83); PFS rate was 49.4% vs 37.3% at 6 mo and 19.7% vs 5.9% at 12 mo. Objective response rate (ORR) and duration of response (DoR) also favored the adebrelimab+chemo group (Table 1). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events occurred in 85.7% vs 84.9% of patients with adebrelimab+chemo vs placebo+chemo, with the most common (frequency ≥5%) being hematological toxicities in both groups. Conclusions: The addition of adebrelimab to chemotherapy significantly improved OS with an acceptable safety profile, supporting this combination as a new first-line treatment option for ES-SCLC. Efficacy outcomes Adebrelimab+Chemo (n=230) Placebo+Chemo (n=232) Median OS (95% CI), mo 15.3 (13.2-17.5) 12.8 (11.3-13.7) HR (95% CI)*, 1-sided log-rank p 0.72 (0.58-0.90); p=0.0017 12-mo OS rate (95% CI), % 62.9 (56.3-68.8) 52.0 (45.4-58.2) 24-mo OS rate (95% CI), % 31.3 (24.9-37.9) 17.2 (12.1-23.0) Median PFS (95% CI), mo 5.8 (5.6-6.9) 5.6 (5.5-5.7) HR (95% CI)*, 1-sided log-rank p 0.67 (0.54-0.83); p <0.0001 6-mo PFS rate (95% CI), % 49.4 (42.4-56.0) 37.3 (30.7-43.9) 12-mo PFS rate (95% CI), % 19.7 (14.5-25.5) 5.9 (3.1-10.1) IRC-assessed ORR (95% CI), % 70.4 (64.1-76.3) 65.9 (59.5-72.0) Median DoR (95% CI), mo 5.6 (4.6-6.7) 4.6 (4.3-5.5) *Stratified Cox proportional-hazards model Citation Format: Ying Cheng, Jie Wang, Caicun Zhou, Wenxiu Yao, Qiming Wang, Xuhong Min, Gongyan Chen, Xingxiang Xu, Xingya Li, Fei Xu, Yong Fang, Runxiang Yang, Guohua Yu, Youling Gong, Jun Zhao, Yun Fan, Quan Liu, Lejie Cao, Yu Yao, Yunpeng Liu, Xiaoling Li, Jingxun Wu, Zhiyong He, Kaihua Lu, Liyan Jiang, Huiqing Yu, Chengping Hu, Wenhua Zhao, Jian Zhao, Gang Wu, Dingzhi Huang, Chengshui Chen, Cuimin Ding, Baihong Zhang, Xiuwen Wang, Hui Luo, Baolan Li, Ben Zhang, Haowen Li, Ke Ma. Adebrelimab or placebo plus carboplatin and etoposide as first-line treatment for extensive-stage SCLC: A phase 3 trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr CT038.
IMpower010: Final disease-free survival (DFS) and second overall survival (OS) interim results after ≥5 years of follow up of a phase III study of adjuvant atezolizumab vs best supportive care in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Heather A. Wakelee,Nasser K. Altorki,Caicun Zhou,Tibor Csőszi,Ihor O. Vynnychenko,Oleksandr Goloborodko,Achim Rittmeyer,Martin Reck,Alex Martinez-Marti,Hirotsugu Kenmotsu,Yuh-Min Chen,Antonio Chella,Shunichi Sugawara,Chenqi Fu,Marcus Ballinger,Yu Deng,Minu K Srivastava,Elizabeth Bennett,Barbara Jenifer Gitlitz,Enriqueta Felip

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.17_suppl.lba8035

IF: 45.3

2024-06-06

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:LBA8035 Background: IMpower010 (NCT02486718) met its primary endpoint of significant DFS improvement with atezo vs BSC after adj chemotherapy in resected NSCLC in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% and all-randomized stage II-IIIA populations, leading to worldwide approval of adj atezo for PD-L1 TC ≥1% or PD-L1 TC ≥50% stage II-IIIA NSCLC. At OS IA1, a trend favoring atezo was seen in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% stage II-IIIA population. Here we report findings from the DFS FA and OS IA2. Methods: The IMpower010 study design has been previously described (Felip et al, Lancet 2021). The primary DFS and secondary OS endpoints were tested hierarchically: DFS in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% (SP263) stage II-IIIA, then in the all-randomized stage II-IIIA, and then in the intent-to-treat (ITT; stage IB-IIIA) populations, followed by OS in the ITT population. Secondary endpoints included 3- and 5-y DFS and DFS in the PD-L1 TC ≥50% (SP263) stage II-IIIA population. OS in the ITT population could only be formally tested if the significance boundary for DFS in that population was crossed. Results: At the DFS FA and OS IA2 (clinical cutoff date: Jan 26, 2024), with a minimum follow-up of 60 mo, DFS and OS for the PD-L1 TC ≥1% and TC ≥50% stage II-IIIA populations were consistent with previously observed benefit; the difference in median (m) DFS between arms in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% population was 31.2 mo (Table). In the ITT population, the significance boundary for DFS was not crossed and OS was similar between arms, although data were immature. The safety profile of atezo was consistent with prior analyses. Conclusions: These results provide the first cancer immunotherapy data with ≥5 y of follow-up from a Phase III study in resectable NSCLC. Although the statistical boundary for the ITT population was not crossed, DFS benefit with adj atezo continues to translate into a positive OS trend vs BSC in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% and TC ≥50% stage II-IIIA populations. These results further support the use of adj atezo in PD-L1–selected populations. Clinical trial information: NCT02486718 . [Table: see text]

oncology
IMpower010: Primary results of a phase III global study of atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Heather A. Wakelee,Nasser K. Altorki,Caicun Zhou,Tibor Csőszi,Ihor O. Vynnychenko,Oleksandr Goloborodko,Alexander Luft,Andrey Akopov,Alex Martinez-Marti,Hirotsugu Kenmotsu,Yuh-Min Chen,Antonio Chella,Shunichi Sugawara,Barbara J. Gitlitz,Elizabeth Bennett,Fan Wu,Jing Yi,Yu Deng,Mark McCleland,Enriqueta Felip

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.8500

IF: 45.3

2021-05-20

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:8500 Background: Adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy (chemo) provides only a modest 5-year survival benefit in fully resected, high-risk early-stage NSCLC. We report the primary disease-free survival (DFS) results from the pre-planned interim analysis of IMpower010, a randomized phase 3 open-label trial of adjuvant atezolizumab (atezo; anti–PD-L1) vs best supportive care (BSC) after adjuvant chemo in patients (pts) with early-stage resected NSCLC. Methods: Eligible pts had completely resected (4-12 weeks prior to enrollment) Stage IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA NSCLC (AJCC/UICC v7) and ECOG PS 0-1. A total of 1280 pts were enrolled, and 1269 pts received up to four 21-day cycles of cisplatin-based chemo (plus pemetrexed, docetaxel, gemcitabine or vinorelbine). Of these pts (n=1269), 1005 were subsequently randomized 1:1 to 16 cycles of atezo 1200 mg Q3W or BSC. The primary endpoint of investigator-assessed DFS and secondary endpoint of overall survival (OS) were tested hierarchically: first DFS in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% (SP263) subgroup with Stage II-IIIA disease, then DFS in all randomized pts with Stage II-IIIA disease, then DFS in the ITT population (Stage IB-IIIA) and finally OS in the ITT population. Efficacy assessments were based on randomized pts. Safety was assessed in the safety-evaluable population, defined as pts who received ≥1 dose of atezo or who had ≥1 post-baseline safety assessment if randomized to the BSC arm. Results: At data cutoff (January 21, 2021), median follow-up was 32.2 months in the ITT population. Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. Atezo showed statistically significant DFS benefit vs BSC in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% Stage II-IIIA and all randomized Stage II-IIIA populations; the significance boundary was not crossed for DFS in the ITT population (Table). OS data were immature and not formally tested. Pts in the atezo arm received a median of 16 (range, 1-16) atezo doses. Any-grade AEs occurred in 92.7% (atezo) and 70.7% (BSC); events were Grade 3/4 in 21.8% and 11.5%, respectively. Grade 5 treatment-related AEs occurred in 0.8% of pts in the atezo arm. AEs leading to atezo discontinuation occurred in 18.2% of atezo-treated pts. Conclusions: IMpower010 met its primary endpoint, showing DFS benefit with adjuvant atezo vs BSC after adjuvant chemo in pts with resected Stage II-IIIA NSCLC, with pronounced benefit in the PD-L1 TC ≥1% subgroup. The safety profile of atezo was consistent with prior experience of atezo monotherapy across indications and lines of therapy. Funding: F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. Clinical trial information: NCT02486718. [Table: see text]

oncology
Abstract A017: Identifying proliferative and immune-modulatory drivers of small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

Myung Chang Lee,Velimir Gayevskiy,Stefanie Morris,Minu K Srivastava,Namrata S Patil,Stephen V Liu,Martin Reck,Sanjeev Mariathasan,David S Shames,David P MacPherson,Robert J Johnston,Barzin Y Nabet

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1158/2326-6074.tumimm24-a017

IF: 10.1

2024-10-19

Cancer Immunology Research

Abstract:Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive form of lung cancer that causes an estimated 200,000 patient deaths globally every year. Most (>70%) patients present with extensive stage (ES)-SCLC, and the disease primarily presents with a neuroendocrine (NE), immune-desert phenotype, with low expression of antigen-presenting machinery genes. Despite limited immune infiltration in the tumor, SCLC has reproducibly responded to immune checkpoint blockade. IMpower133 was a pivotal Phase III trial that added atezolizumab (anti-PD-L1) to platinum/etoposide chemotherapy for treatment of first-line ES-SCLC, which led to the first approval of an immune checkpoint blockade strategy in SCLC. While the inclusion of atezolizumab to the treatment regimen has extended the survival of some patients, SCLC remains an unmet medical need with a mOS of 12.3 months. Furthermore, we lack a deep molecular understanding of factors mediating response and resistance to standard of care therapies in SCLC. To understand the genetic drivers of SCLC that could be linked to immunotherapy resistance, we analyzed the matched whole-exome sequencing and RNA-seq data from baseline tumor samples collected from the IMpower133 trial. Previously, we applied the non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) approach to the RNA-seq data, which clustered patients into four subsets of SCLC, with varying degrees of immune infiltration, neuroendocrine program activation, and clinical benefit from immunotherapy. Notably, we identified an inflamed-neuroendocrine (I-NE) subset of patients that exhibit longer overall survival with chemoimmunotherapy compared to chemotherapy alone, and an inflamed-non-neuroendocrine (I-nonNE) subset of patients that did not show a similar benefit from the addition of immunotherapy to chemotherapy. Here, we interrogated the matched WES data for recurrent alterations that may identify subsets of tumors with distinct immunological features. We identified several genes whose alterations significantly affected the enrichment of immune-related gene signatures. In particular, we identified MANF and CSK, genes previously shown to be potential tumor suppressors, as genes whose alteration associates with an "immune desert" transcriptional program. Specifically, genetic deletions or low RNA expression was associated with significantly decreased gene expression of gene signatures associated with lymphocytes, macrophages, and antigen presentation machinery. These data suggest a potential mechanism by which commonly inactivated tumor suppressors may shape the "immune desert" phenotype of SCLC. Further work is needed to determine if and how these genes may directly or indirectly modulate the tumor-immune interaction. Citation Format: Myung Chang Lee, Velimir Gayevskiy, Stefanie Morris, Minu K Srivastava, Namrata S Patil, Stephen V Liu, Martin Reck, Sanjeev Mariathasan, David S Shames, David P MacPherson, Robert J Johnston, Barzin Y Nabet. Identifying proliferative and immune-modulatory drivers of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2024 Oct 18-21; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2024;12(10 Suppl) nr A017.

oncology,immunology
First-line Atezolizumab/durvalumab Plus Platinum–etoposide Combined with Radiotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Lijuan Li,Dan Yang,Yanmei Min,Anyan Liao,Jing Zhao,Leilei Jiang,Xin Dong,Wei Deng,Huiming Yu,Rong Yu,Jun Zhao,Anhui Shi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-023-10784-8

IF: 4.638

2023-01-01

BMC Cancer

Abstract:Abstract Background Immunotherapy has made significant advances in the treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), but data in combination with radiotherapy are scarce. This study aims to assess the safety and efficacy of chemoimmunotherapy combined with thoracic radiotherapy in patients with ES-SCLC. Methods This single-center retrospective study analyzed patients with ES-SCLC who received standard platinum–etoposide chemotherapy combined with atezolizumab or durvalumab immunotherapy as induction treatment, followed by consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (CTRT) before disease progression in the first-line setting. Adverse events during radiotherapy with or without maintenance immunotherapy and survival outcomes were assessed. Results Between December 2019 and November 2021, 36 patients with ES-SCLC were identified to have received such treatment modality at one hospital. The number of metastatic sites at diagnosis was 1–4. The biological effective dose of CTRT ranged from 52 to 113 Gy. Only two patients (6%) developed grade 3 toxic effect of thrombocytopenia, but none experienced grade 4 or 5 toxicity. Four patients developed immune-related pneumonitis during the induction treatment period but successfully completed later CTRT. The rate of radiation-related pneumonitis was 8% with grades 1–2 and well tolerated. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.8 months, but the median overall survival (OS) was not determined. The estimated 1-year OS was 80.2% and 1-year PFS was 53.4%. Conclusions Immunotherapy combined with CTRT for ES-SCLC is safe and has ample survival benefit.
Results of a phase III clinical trial with anti-PDL1 treatment in combination with chemotherapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

Shun Lu,Xiang Rong Dai,Benjamin Xiaoyi Li,Zhiwei Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2024.42.16_suppl.8095

IF: 45.3

2024-06-01

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:8095 Background: In China, small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for over 15% of lung cancers. The morbidity of SCLC has been continuously increasing. SCLC is invasive, fast-growing cancer that distinctly differs from other cancers. Approximately 70% of cases present with metastasis at diagnosis and the median overall survival rate is about 8 to 11 months with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. Although being sensitive to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, SCLC patients are liable to relapse and often present with drug resistance. Here we study the combination of Socazolimab, an anti-PDL1 antibody, carboplatin and etoposide to treat extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Methods: The study is a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled multicenter Phase III clinical trial. Patients who have extensive-stage SCLC are eligible to the trial. Patients are randomly assigned to the study group (Socazolimab + carboplatin + etoposide) or control group (placebo + carboplatin + etoposide) at 1:1 ratio, with a treatment cycle of every 3 weeks. There are 4 cycles of chemotherapy followed by Socazolimab or placebo alone until termination events occurred or for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS). The major secondary endpoint is progression free survival (PFS). Results: There were a total of 498 patients recruited for the study with average age of 61.9 amount which 449 patients were diagnosed with stage IV SCLC. All the analysis was based on intent-to-treat (ITT). The median baseline performance status score was 1.0. The median OS of study group and control group are 13.90 months (95% CI: 12.22-15.34) and 11.58 months (95% CI: 10.64-12.81) respectively, with a P-value of 0.0316. The 24 month survival rate of study group and control group are 20.7% (95% CI:14.8-27.3) and 5.9 %(95% CI: 0.8-18.9). The median PFS of the two groups are 5.55 months (95% CI:5.06-5.82) and 4.37 months (95% CI: 4.27-4.70) with a P-value < 0.0001. The treatment related adverse event were similar in both groups. Conclusions: These results show that Socazolimab plus chemotherapy continued to provide clinically meaningful improvements in OS for patients with extensive stage small cell lung cancer. Clinical trial information: NCT04878016 .

oncology
Efficacy and safety of toripalimab with anlotinib and chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Preliminary results of an open-label, single-arm, phase II study.

Hao Luo,Dan Jian,Yan Feng,Li Zhong,Qian Chen,Wei Guan,Shiheng Zhang,Jiamin Luo,Xueqing Yang,Kan Gong,Yanli Xiong,Mengxia Li,Mingfang Xu,Yu Pu,Liang Zhao,Chengyuan Qian,Nan Dai,Dong Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.e20570

IF: 45.3

2021-05-20

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Abstract:e20570 Background: Although the combination of PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with platinum-etoposide chemotherapy (EP) is the preferred first-line treatment for patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), the survival benefit of the addition of ICIs was still modest. Recent studies supported that combination of ICIs and anti-angiogenic agents could be a promising therapeutic strategy for normalization the immunosuppressive microenvironment and overcoming the low efficacy of ICIs. We reported the efficacy and safety of toripalimab combined with anlotinib and EP in treatment-naïve ES-SCLC. Methods: The eligible ES-SCLC patients (18-75 years, ECOG PS ≤2), with measurable target lesion (RECIST v1.1) received toripalimab (240 mg, d1) combined with etoposide (100 mg/m 2 , d1-3) plus carboplatin (AUC = 5, d1)/cisplatin (75 mg/m 2 , d1) and anlotinib (12 mg QD, d1-14) of a 21-day cycle for 4-6 cycles, then patients with CR、PR or SD could continue to receive maintenance therapy with toripalimab and anlotinib until disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and safety. Results: Between 2018 October and 2020 November, 16 treatment-naïve ES-SCLC patients (14 males, 2 females) were enrolled. The median age is 63 (range, 42-74) years. The median follow-up was 7.6 months. 100% (16/16) patients achieved an objective response (1 CR and 15 PR). The DCR was also 100% (16/16). The median DOR had not been reached (range, 4.8+ to 21.9+ month). 37.5% (6/16) patients had disease progression after six months of treatment, while median PFS was not reached. As of Jan 31, 2021, all patients were still alive. The median OS had not been reached. 62.5% (10/16) patients remained on-treatment. The most common adverse events (AEs) were grade 1-2 anemia (75%), decreased appetite (50%) and neutropenia (43.8%). Seven patients had Grade 3 AEs (5 neutropenia; 1 leukopenia, 1 emesis, and 1 ketoacidosis). No Grade 4/5 AEs occurred. Conclusions: Toripalimab combined with anlotinib and etoposide plus carboplatin/cisplatin showed promising anti-tumor activity and tolerable toxicities in treatment-naïve ES-SCLC. Clinical trial information: NCT04731909.

oncology

[Role of pituitary gland in diabetes mellitus].

Long-term survival in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer treated with different immune checkpoint inhibitors in multiple-line therapies: A case report and literature review

Durable Response to Atezolizumab in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer Leading to 60 Months Overall Survival: A Case Report

Efficacy and Safety of PD-L1 Inhibitors Plus Chemotherapy Versus Chemotherapy Alone in First-Line Treatment of Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Real-World Study.

IMpower150 Final Overall Survival Analyses for Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab and Chemotherapy in First-Line Metastatic Nonsquamous NSCLC.

Five-year survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer treated with atezolizumab in the Phase III IMpower133 study and the Phase III IMbrella A extension study

Extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer in patients receiving atezolizumab plus carboplatin–etoposide: stratification of outcome based on a composite score that combines gene expression profiling and immune characterization of microenvironment

Efficacy and safety analysis of anlotinib combined with etoposide plus cisplatin/carboplatin as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC): The final results from a phase II single-arm trial.

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes of Immunotherapy in Extensive‐stage Small‐cell Lung Cancer Based on Real‐world Practice

Isolation of Populations of Antipeptide Antibodies Directed against Different Epitopes of the Same Fragment

Comprehensive genomic and spatial immune infiltration analysis of survival outliers in extensive-stage small cell lung cancer receiving first-line chemoimmunotherapy

A real-world study of anlotinib in combination with PD-L1 inhibitors plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for extensive-stage small cell lung cancer.

The control of marine propulsion plant

Collusion-Resistant digital video watermarking for copyright protection application

Abstract CT038: Adebrelimab or Placebo Plus Carboplatin and Etoposide As First-Line Treatment for Extensive-Stage SCLC: A Phase 3 Trial

IMpower010: Final disease-free survival (DFS) and second overall survival (OS) interim results after ≥5 years of follow up of a phase III study of adjuvant atezolizumab vs best supportive care in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

IMpower010: Primary results of a phase III global study of atezolizumab versus best supportive care after adjuvant chemotherapy in resected stage IB-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Abstract A017: Identifying proliferative and immune-modulatory drivers of small cell lung cancer (SCLC)

First-line Atezolizumab/durvalumab Plus Platinum–etoposide Combined with Radiotherapy in Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Results of a phase III clinical trial with anti-PDL1 treatment in combination with chemotherapy for extensive stage small cell lung cancer.

Efficacy and safety of toripalimab with anlotinib and chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: Preliminary results of an open-label, single-arm, phase II study.