Fate, risk and sources of antibiotic resistome and its attenuation dynamics in the river water-sediment system: Field and microcosm study

Chang Liu,Xin Shan,Jinping Chen,Yuxin Zhang,Jinsheng Wang,Haiyang Chen
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2023.122853
2024-01-01
Abstract:Antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in rivers have received widespread attentions. Deciphering the fate and spread mechanisms of ARGs in river system can contribute to the design of effective strategies for reducing resistome risk in the environment. Although some studies have reported the prevalence and distribution of ARGs in rivers worldwide, few have systematically explored their fates, sources and risks in river water-sediment system. Also, the role of natural sunlight on the attenuation and fate of ARGs in river remains to be demonstrated. To fill the gaps, field investigation and microcosm experiment have been conducted in this study to reveal the fate, risk, source-sink relationship and attenuation dynamics of ARGs in an urban river water-sediment system, by utilizing high-throughput sequencing-based metagenomic assembly analysis and machine-learning-based source tracking tool. In all, 527 unique ARGs belonging to 29 antimicrobial classes were identified in the river. Relatively, the level of ARGs in the sediments were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than that in the waters. Variance partitioning analysis indicated the biotic and abiotic factors co-governed the riverine resistome, totally explaining 76% and 83% variations of ARGs in the waters and sediments, respectively. Microcosm experiment under natural light and dark condition showed that light induced the decay of ARGs in the waters and might promote their transfers from waters to sediments, which were also confirmed by the attenuation dynamics of bacteria in the experimental water-sediment system. Notably, the co-occurrences of ARGs with MGEs and VFs on the same contigs suggested resistome risk in the river, and relatively, the risk scores in the sediments were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than those in the waters. Source apportionment with metagenomic resistome signatures showed the Wenyu River was the most dominant contributor of ARGs in the downstream, with average contributions of 44.5% and 40.8% in the waters and sediments, respectively.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?