Transmitted Drug Resistance and HIV Diversity Among Adolescents Newly Diagnosed With HIV in Spain

Cristina Epalza,Ana Valadés-Alcaraz,José María González-Alba,Carolina Beltrán-Pavez,Miguel Gutiérrez-López,Marina Rubio-Garrido,Clàudia Fortuny,Marie Antoinette Frick,Leopoldo Muñoz Medina,Santiago Moreno,José Sanz,Pablo Rojo,María Luisa Navarro,África Holguín,Cohort of the Spanish HIV/AIDS Pediatric (CoRISpe) and Adult (CoRIS) Networks
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0000000000004138
2024-01-01
Abstract:Background: Virologic characterization of newly HIV-diagnosed adolescents could help to improve their specific needs. The objective was to describe the transmitted drug resistance mutations (TDR) and its transmission by clusters in this population in Spain. Methods: TDR to retrotranscriptase and protease inhibitors included in the WHO TDR list 2009 implemented in the Calibrated Population Resistance tool v8.0 (Stanford) were studied in HIV pol sequences from all HIV-diagnosed adolescents (12-19-year-old) enrolled during 2004-2019 period in the Spanish pediatric and adult (CoRISpe-CoRIS) cohorts. The found TDR were compared with the provided by the Stanford algorithm v9.0 2021. HIV-1 variants and transmission clusters were also studied. Results: Among 410 HIV-1 adolescents diagnosed, 141 (34.4%) had available ART-naive sequences. They were mostly male (81.6%), Spanish (55.3%) and with behavioral risk (92.2%), mainly male-to-male sexual contact (63.1%). TDR prevalence was significantly higher by Stanford versus WHO list (18.4% vs. 7.1%; P = 0.004). The most prevalent TDR by the WHO list was K103N (3.6%) and by Stanford E138A (6.6%), both at retrotranscriptase. E138A, related to rilpivirine/etravirine resistance, was absent in the WHO list. One in 4 adolescents carried HIV-1 non-B variants. We described 5 transmission clusters, and 2 carried TDR mutations. Conclusions: Our data suggest a high TDR prevalence in adolescents with a new HIV diagnosis in Spain, similar to adults, 2 active TDR transmission clusters, and the need for the WHO TDR list update. These findings could have implications for the options of the recently available rilpivirine-related long-acting treatment and in first-line regimen election.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?