Abstract:The H2020 Reliance project delivers a suite of innovative and interconnected services that extend European Open Science Cloud (EOSC)'s capabilities to support the management of the research lifecycle within Earth Science Communities and Copernicus Users. The project has delivered 3 complementary technologies: Research Objects (ROs), Data Cubes and AI-based Text Mining.RoHub is a Research Object management platform that implements these 3 technologies and enables researchers to collaboratively manage, share and preserve their research work.RoHub implements the full RO model and paradigm: resources associated to a particular research work are aggregated into a single FAIR digital object, and metadata relevant for understanding and interpreting the content is represented as semantic metadata that are user and machine readable. The development of RoHub is co-designed and validated through multidisciplinary and thematic real life use cases led by three different Earth Science communities: Geohazards, Sea Monitoring and Climate Change communities. A RO commonly starts its life as an empty Live RO. ROs aggregate new objects through their whole lifecycle. This means, a RO is filled incrementally by aggregating new relevant resources such as workflows, datasets, documents according to its typology that are being created, reused or repurposed. These resources can be modified at any point in time.We can copy and keep ROs in time through snapshots which reflect their status at a given point in time. Snapshots can have their own identifiers (DOIs) which facilitates tracking the evolution of a research. At some point in time, a RO can be published and archived (so called Archived RO) with a permanent identifier (DOI). New Live ROs can be derived based on an existing Archived RO, for instance by forking it. To guide researchers, different types of Research Objects can be created:Bibliography-centric: includes manuals, anonymous interviews, publications, multimedia (video, songs) and/or other material that support research;Data-centric: refers to datasets which can be indexed, discovered and manipulated;Executable: includes the code, data and computational environment along with a description of the research object and in some cases a workflow. This type of ROs can be executed and is often used for scripts and/or Jupyter Notebooks;Software-centric: also known as "Code as a Research Object". Software-centric ROs include source codes and associated documentation. They often include sample datasets for running tests.Workflow-centric: contains workflow specifications, provenance logs generated when executing the workflows, information about the evolution of the workflow (version) and its components elements, and additional annotations for the workflow as a whole.Basic: can contain anything and is used when the other types do not cover the need.To ease the understanding and the reuse of the ROs, each type of RO (except Basic RO) has a template folder structure that we recommend researchers to select. For instance an executable RO has 4 folders:'biblio' where researchers can aggregate documentations, scientific papers that øed to the development of the software/tool that is aggregated in the tool folder;'input' where all the input datasets required for executing the RO are aggregated;'output' where some or all the results generated by executing the RO are aggregated;'tool' where the executable tool is aggregated. Typically, we aggregate Jupyter Notebook and/or executable workflows (Galaxy or snakemake workflows).In addition to the different types of ROs and associated template structures, researchers can select the type of resources that constitutes the main entity of a RO: for instance, a Jupyter Notebook can be selected as the main entity of an executable RO. As shown on Fig. 1, this additional metadata is then visible to everyone (and machine readable) to ease reuse. Examples of Bibliography-centric and Data-centric Research Objects are shown on Fig. 2: the overall overview of any types of Research Object is always the same with mandatory metadata information such as the title, description, authors & collaborators, sketch (featured plots/images), the content of the RO (with different structures depending on the type of ROs). Additional information is displayed on the right panel such as number of downloads, additional discovered metadata (automatically discovered from the Reliance text enrichment service), free keywords (added by end-users) and citation. The 'toolbox' and 'share' sections allows end-users to download, snapshot and archive the RO and/or share it.Any Research Object in RoHub is a FAIR digital object that is for instance findable in OpenAire, including Live ROs.In our presentation, we will showcase different types of ROs for the 3 Earth Science communities represented in Reliance to highlight how the scientists in our respective disciplines changed their wo -Abstract Truncated-

Data management plans as linked open data: exploiting ARGOS FAIR and machine actionable outputs in the OpenAIRE research graph

The FAIRness of data management plans: an assessment of some European DMPs

The Value of a Data and Digital Object Management Plan (D(DO)MP) in Fostering Sharing Practices in a Multidisciplinary Multinational Project

Data Management in Distributed, Federated Research Infrastructures: The Case of EPOS

Understanding the Data Management Plan as a Boundary Object through a Multi-stakeholder perspective

Experiences with a training DSW knowledge model for early-stage researchers

Research on collaborative management method of Argo data

Mapping OMOP-CDM to RDF: Bringing Real-World-Data to the Semantic Web Realm

Updating Linked Data practices for FAIR Digital Object principles

The FAIR Funder pilot programme to make it easy for funders to require and for grantees to produce FAIR Data

Enabling FAIR Research in Earth Science through Research Objects

A multi-omics data analysis workflow packaged as a FAIR Digital Object

Exploring the social activity of open research data on ResearchGate: implications for the data literacy of researchers

FDO Manager: Minimum Viable FAIR Digital Object Implementation

The FAIREr Guiding Principles: Organizing data and metadata into semantically meaningful types of FAIR Digital Objects to increase their cognitive interoperability and human explorability

FAIR Research Objects for realizing Open Science with RELIANCE EOSC project

Evaluating FAIR Digital Object and Linked Data as distributed object systems

An Open Science Platform for the Next Generation of Data

OpenEarth - Inter-Company Management of: Data, Models, Tools & Knowledge

A research data management (RDM) community for ELIXIR

Towards a Cloud-Based Service for Maintaining and Analyzing Data About Scientific Events