In vivo efficacy proof of concept of a large-size bioprinted dermo-epidermal substitute for permanent wound coverage
Maxime Abellan Lopez,Laurence Hutter,Etienne Pagin,Mélanie Vélier,Julie Véran,Laurent Giraudo,Chloe Dumoulin,Laurent Arnaud,Nicolas Macagno,Romain Appay,Laurent Daniel,Benjamin Guillet,Laure Balasse,Hugo Caso,Dominique Casanova,Baptiste Bertrand,Françoise Dignat,Loïc Hermant,Hélène Riesterer,Fabien Guillemot,Florence Sabatier,Jérémy Magalon
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1217655
IF: 5.7
2023-07-26
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Abstract:Introduction: An autologous split-thickness skin graft (STSG) is a standard treatment for coverage of full-thickness skin defects. However, this technique has two major drawbacks: the use of general anesthesia for skin harvesting and scar sequelae on the donor site. In order to reduce morbidity associated with STSG harvesting, researchers have developed autologous dermo-epidermal substitutes (DESs) using cell culture, tissue engineering, and, more recently, bioprinting approaches. This study assessed the manufacturing reliability and in vivo efficacy of a large-size good manufacturing practice (GMP)-compatible bio-printed human DES, named Poieskin ® , for acute wound healing treatment. Methods: Two batches (40 cm 2 each) of Poieskin ® were produced, and their reliability and homogeneity were assessed using histological scoring. Immunosuppressed mice received either samples of Poieskin ® ( n = 8) or human STSG ( n = 8) immediately after longitudinal acute full-thickness excision of size 1 × 1.5 cm, applied on the skeletal muscle plane. The engraftment rate was assessed through standardized photographs on day 16 of the follow-up. Moreover, wound contraction, superficial vascularization, and local inflammation were evaluated via standardized photographs, laser Doppler imaging, and PET imaging, respectively. Histological analysis was finally performed after euthanasia. Results: Histological scoring reached 75% ± 8% and 73% ± 12%, respectively, displaying a robust and homogeneous construct. Engraftment was comparable for both groups: 91.8% (SD = 0.1152) for the Poieskin ® group versus 100% (SD = 0) for the human STSG group. We did not record differences in either graft perfusion, PET imaging, or histological scoring on day 16. Conclusion: Poieskin ® presents consistent bioengineering manufacturing characteristics to treat full-thickness cutaneous defects as an alternative to STSG in clinical applications. Manufacturing of Poieskin ® is reliable and homogeneous, leading to a clinically satisfying rate of graft take compared to the reference human STSG in a mouse model. These results encourage the use of Poieskin ® in phase I clinical trials as its manufacturing procedure is compatible with pharmaceutical guidelines.
multidisciplinary sciences