The Global Tree Assessment Provides a Multifaceted View on the Future of Tree Diversity Conservation
Charles H. Cannon,Anurag Dhyani,Chen Jin,Malin Rivers
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ppp3.10392
2023-01-01
Plants People Planet
Abstract:Trees are of exceptional ecological importance, playing a major functional role in the world's ecosystems, while also supporting many other plants, animals and fungi. The conservation status of tree species is therefore of key importance to planning management strategies and prioritising actions. Through the Global Tree Assessment, we now have knowledge about the threat status for tree species globally. In this special issue of Plants, People, Planet, 13 articles provide a multi-faceted view of the impact of the Global Tree Assessment, how we might improve and accelerate future assessments, and how the information can be used to address issues facing ecosystem restoration. The publication of the State of the World's Trees (BGCI, 2021) has reinforced the growing recognition of the importance of trees and forests to Earth's environmental sustainability. Trees perform vital functions for human society, from basic carbon sequestration to making cities more livable. Trees create rich, multi-dimensional habitats for animals, fungi, and other plants. Essentially, human societies and economies rely on the health and diversity of our planet's trees (Rivers et al., 2022, this issue). With the publication of the Global Tree Assessment, we are gaining a comprehensive understanding of the threat status of trees, allowing us to prioritize conservation efforts and create more effective strategies. In this special issue of Plants, People, Planet, a compelling representation of the complex, multi-faceted, and rapidly changing issues addressed by the Global Tree Assessment is provided. The 13 articles include investigations from a number of different viewpoints and scales, from national assessments of highly diverse but relatively poorly known floras to a single protected area, from a taxonomic focus on a single important family to carefully selected but completely known groups of species, and even specific practical issues involved in the reintroduction and restoration of an endangered species. The paper by Barstow et al. (2022) focuses on the assessment of more than 90% of tree species that are endemic to Papua New Guinea. The study provides valuable information on the risk of extinction, major threats, and the conservation and research needs of the country's tree flora. The contribution by Chua et al. (2022) sheds light on the current state of knowledge regarding extinction risk to tree species in Malaysia (one of world's top megadiverse countries for tree species). The study highlights the extent and types of extinction risk faced by several keystone tree families, namely, Dipterocarpaceae, and tree genera of Myristicaceae and Sapotaceae, whose timbers remain highly valued. Linsky et al. (2022) compare the assessments and ex-situ data over time and examine the most recent information available for Magnoliaceae species to guide the development of national and international conservation strategies in the present era. Erkens et al. (2022) examine the impact of human-induced global change on the ecosystem of the globally distributed tropical plant group Annonaceae (Soursop family). The study utilizes distributional data and International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List assessments to better understand the effects of human activity on this plant group. On the other hand Verspagen and Erkens (2022) present a method to rapidly evaluate the conservation status of species with limited available data, which will accelerate the inclusion of species from large groups into the IUCN Red List. In their article, Rivers et al. (2022) discuss the scientists' warning to humanity on the extinction of tree species. They highlight how the loss of tree species will lead to the extinction of many other plants and animals, significantly altering the world's ecosystems. The article also emphasizes that tree extinction will have a negative impact on billions of people, resulting in the loss of livelihoods and benefits. The work highlights the urgent need for a series of actions to avert an ecological, cultural, and socio-economic catastrophe caused by the widespread extinction of tree species. Rønsted et al. (2022) conducted an assessment of the conservation status of tree flora in the Limahuli Valley of the Hawaiian Island of Kaua'I, and developed a restoration plan for 11 endangered tree species using the Global Tree Assessment framework. The article also offers suggestions for creating sustainable, long-term restoration initiatives. Hills et al. (2022) assessed the risk of extinction of six under-studied genera that have ethnobotanical uses, enabling the establishment of conservation priorities. Dhyani et al. (2022) endeavoured to reintroduce the Critically Endangered Buchanania barberi, a tree species that is endemic to the south Western Ghats (a UNESCO World Heritage site) in Kerala, India that has just two mature individuals remaining. In their study, Yang et al. (2022) presented a compelling case of how conservation techniques and research were employed to rescue the critically endangered tree species Acer yangbiense, resulting in it becoming one of the most successful conservation stories. The global relationship between tree species richness and the number of threatened species found in each country remains consistent, particularly among countries with high species richness (Figure 1a). Madagascar is an exceptional global outlier, with 1842 threatened species out of a total of 3129, while Brazil, the richest country in terms of plant species richness, falls within the predicted trend. Generally, many countries with 1000 plant species or fewer fall below the global trend. Most countries with higher than average threat levels compared with the global trend are island nations, such as Sri Lanka, Cuba, the Philippines, and Indonesia, except for Mexico, which Samain et al. (2022) discuss in their paper. The relationship between the proportions of endemic species versus threatened species is considerably more scattered, with island nations generally containing higher proportions of endemic species. However, many nations with higher and lower than average levels of threatened species are also evident. These broad global patterns of the relationships between threat and species richness can highlight outliers and interesting test cases to examine more closely to better understand the factors driving these outcomes. The articles in this special issue generally represent assessments and analyses of the better-known tree groups and geographic regions, highlighting the limited knowledge of tree species distribution and threat in many parts of the world. In Papua New Guinea, where 36% of species are threatened, a significant proportion of species are also data deficient (Barstow et al., 2022). In Mexico, the assessment excludes plant groups for which no monograph exists, resulting in the exclusion of a considerable amount of the overall plant diversity (Samain et al., 2022). Moreover, the most diverse floras often have a higher proportion of rare species. This makes it increasingly challenging to assess them when the geographic distribution data drops below fewer than five observations. On the other hand, in countries like the United States, where species richness is relatively low and collection records are dense, there are very few data deficient species (Carrero et al., 2022). Essentially, our knowledge of plant diversity tends to be most limited in areas where it is most important, highlighting a clear global inequity between temperate and tropical countries in terms of overall knowledge. In species rich countries, like Colombia (Lopez-Gallego & Morales-Morales, 2023), effective approaches are needed to provide rigorous methods to rapidly assess the threat status of trees in large diverse countries. These assessment efforts are still hampered by the substantial fraction of poorly known species, or even undiscovered species, in some of the world's most biodiverse countries. These countries require two key steps: (i) up-to-date comprehensive collections and (ii) monographic taxonomic treatments. However, achieving these steps is difficult and time-consuming. This limit to our knowledge must be accepted and incorporated into our assessments, as several articles in this special issue explore. Traditional and modern methods to accelerate the gathering and sharing of this fundamental knowledge about species distribution and taxonomy, such as specimen digitization, both in the herbarium and the field, collected by both professionals and community scientists, in addition to machine learning techniques for species identification and trait characterization, are needed. An effort to prioritize which elements of the dark matter of conservation can be most effectively addressed and which will remain obscure should be examined in the context of each country's capacity and resources. Challenging theoretical questions also remain around our definition of the currency for all of these assessments: "how do we meaningfully measure diversity?". Currently, assessments are conducted on taxonomically recognized species, treating each as a distinct conservation and evolutionary units. Emerging evidence from genomic studies indicates that interspecific gene flow is a major element of species evolution and adaptation and given the very rapid pace of global change and the emerging of novel ecosystems. This interspecific gene flow is expected to occur and likely increase due to human activities. Understanding and incorporating this natural process will help us in planning and coordinating ecological restoration to more effectively to include numerous species as part of a suite of co-evolving taxa, instead of isolated units. Invasive pests and diseases are some of the major threats to tree species across the temperate northern hemisphere, illustrating an interesting dimension of threat as well. In contrast, threats from land conversion and logging impact species based on their rarity and are often indirect, resulting from the destruction of their habitat during timber harvest or land conversion. On the other hand, pests and diseases directly affect the species and can pose a greater threat to common trees. This illustrates the challenges of assessing threats that are not linked to rarity and determine how to manage them. As discussed in several articles of this special issue, deforestation and land conversion into intensive human use remain the biggest threats to tree species globally. Anthropogenic change is driving this very rapid transition from the ecological and evolutionary processes that generated earth's remarkable plant diversity to the intensive and often wasteful production of goods and services. The factors determining these changes are determined by global economies and national governments, which change quickly and without necessarily putting environmental protection at the top of their agenda. We need to assess these threats according to our ability to influence the improvement of the environmental circumstances that can protect and restore tree diversity. In line with the goals of the United Nations Decade on Ecosystem Restoration (https://www.decadeonrestoration.org/), we need to develop comprehensive strategy that outlines crucial steps, such as collecting the plant material, propagation, translocation, and restoration of the species and ecosystems they create. Here, we outline a plant diversity conservation network (Figure 2), where the four primary activities are defined as (1) Document, (2) Grow, (3) Plant, and (4) Manage. We use these terms broadly, so that any activity that relates to documentation, for example, from collecting the plant material to analyzing its genetic material, is included under that activity. Central all of these activities is collaboration and dialogue with information technology and creating, refining, and adopting advanced technologies wherever they are appropriate. These internal activities are further framed by four major external factors: (1) Reality, (2) Funding, (3) Sharing, and (4) Mentorship. The first two impinge upon the conservation activities occurring within the ecosystem while the second two determine the future success and acceptance of the conservation activities. Again, each one of these terms can be substantially elaborated and constitute their own ecosystems. This framing of the plant diversity conservation network allows each participant to focus their efforts on the activities where they have the most influence and to identify the partners which have the most natural and effective means of creating a synergistic effect. The geological concept of the Anthropocene is a compelling mindset from which to examine these issues. Humans have so fundamentally altered the major and minor cycles of nutrients, water, ecologies, and diversity, at global and local scales, that we must accept responsibility for maintaining plant diversity across the entire landscape, from urban centers to the deepest forest. Additionally, we need to do more than simply count our losses, we must anticipate and predict the effect of rapid change on both current and future plant diversity. Given the likely unprecedented and unpredictable environments and ecosystems of the future, current diversity will be challenged to adapt and respond. We need to explore the major activities of the plant diversity conservation ecosystem outlined above in order to determine what will most effectively safeguard the future of plant diversity. We have considerable leverage in all four major activities, but much work and improvement remains to be accomplished. First, the documentation, collection, and analysis of existing diversity need to be accelerated. Much of tree diversity is poorly known, as evidenced here, and we should utilize the latest technologies and approaches to capture its variation, distribution, and history. We also need to utilize advanced modelling techniques, to understand species distributions and how environmental change affects them. This will help us to understand the maintenance of diversity, both genetic and functional, in populations. Second, the power and importance of our ability to grow plant diversity cannot be overstated. We learn a great deal about plant diversity when we grow and propagate it. We also need this plant diversity as stock for future plantings. Finally, this element of the conservation network is one that botanical gardens can most directly control: a real emphasis on ex-situ conservation and propagation is needed to produce the diverse living material for ecosystem restoration projects we envision. We can secure the tenure of our living collections and sustain plant populations given a relatively small number of individuals. Finally, we need to recognize what elements of the network we have little to no control over and engage with actors who do, if any exist. External factors ultimately determine the success of our plant diversity conservation activities and means of integrating and influencing these factors must be recognized from the outset. The recent Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework (https://www.cbd.int/gbf/) has highlighted the need for urgent management actions to prevent human-induced extinction of threatened species, through in situ and ex situ conservation and sustainable management practices, and tree conservation ought to be placed at the forefront of these efforts. The authors thank all of the authors who contributed to this special issue. The work on this editorial was performed equally among the co-authors.