Comparative study of hydroxyapatite synthesized using Schiff base and wet chemical precipitation methods

Dhivyaa Anandan,Amit Kumar,Amit Kumar Jaiswal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmbbm.2023.106200

Abstract:Hydroxyapatite (HAp) exists as an inorganic and crystalline composition present in bones and dental enamel, and hence can be utilized as a direct element or as part of the composition of biomaterials and implants for dental and orthopaedic applications. Listed below are a few synthesis techniques for HAp that are listed in the literature: solid-state and mechano-chemical methods (dry methods), wet chemical precipitation and sol-gel methods (wet methods), and combustion and pyrolysis methods (high-temperature processes). Nevertheless, there are new and more productive techniques that result in HAp with a regulated morphology, such as the Schiff base method, which, on reaction with calcium and phosphate precursors, forms chelating complexes to produce HAp nuclei. This research paper presents the comparison in characteristics between HAp synthesized using Schiff base (HAp-SB), wet chemical precipitation (HAp-WC) methods, and commercial HAp (HAp-CM) in their powdered and pelleted form. The average size of HAp-WC particles in the spherical form was found to be 603 nm ± 176, HAp-SB were found to have rod-like morphology, which is very similar to human bone-like HAp, with an average length and width of 1522 nm ± 759 and 400 nm ± 112, respectively, and HAp-CM were found to have spherical morphology with dimensions of 52 nm ± 25. Biological studies show that cell viability of HAp-SB pellet (202.01% ± 8.16) seemed to have higher cell proliferation properties than HAp-WC pellet (145.7% ± 5.11) and HAp-CM pellet (71.53% ± 3.61) due to its higher aspect ratio, and hence higher surface area for the cells to adhere. In a detailed study, it is observed that both techniques had their advantages, and there were no significant disadvantages observed.