Abstract:Objective: The prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism is fraught with uncertainty. Karyotyping, chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA), and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) are three commonly used techniques. In this study, we evaluated these techniques for the prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism and its clinical outcome. Study design: A retrospective review of mosaicism was conducted in 18,369 pregnant women from January 2016 to November 2021. The subjects underwent amniocentesis to obtain amniotic fluid for G-band karyotyping with or without CMA/FISH. Cases diagnosed with chromosomal mosaicism were selected for further analysis. Results: In total, 101 cases of chromosomal mosaicism were detected in 100 pregnant women (0.54%, 100/18,369). Four were lost during follow-up, 61 opted to terminate their pregnancy, and 35 gave birth to a healthy singleton or twins. Among these 35 cases, postnatal cytogenetic testing was performed on eight and two exhibited mosaicism; however, nothing abnormal was observed in the postnatal phenotype follow-up. Karyotyping identified 96 incidents of chromosomal mosaicism including 13 with level II mosaicism and 83 with level III mosaicism, FISH identified 37 cases of mosaicism, and CMA identified 17. The most common form of chromosomal mosaicism involved monosomy X, of which the mosaic fraction in cultured karyotyping appeared higher or comparable to uncultured FISH/CMA (p < 0.05). Discordant mosaic results were observed in 34 of 101 cases (33.7%), most of which resulted from the detection limit of different techniques and/or the dominant growth of a certain cell line. Conclusion: Based on the postnatal follow-up results from the babies born, we obtained a more hopeful result for the prognosis of chromosomal mosaicism. Although karyotyping was the most sensitive method for detecting chromosomal mosaicism, artifacts and bias resulting from culture should be considered, particularly for sex chromosomal abnormalities involving X monosomy, in which the combination with uncultured FISH was necessary. Key points: · Karyotyping combined with uncultured FISH or CMA is beneficial for prenatal diagnosis of chromosomal mosaicism.. · Fetuses without ultrasound structural anomalies with chromosomal mosaicism often have optimistic prognosis..

[Genetic analysis of a fetus with mosaicism Y chromosome aberration]

[Genetic analysis of a fetus with with 45,X/46,X,idic(Y)(q11.2) mosaicism]

[Prenatal diagnosis and genetic analysis of a fetus with partial deletion of Yq and mosaicism of 45,X].

Parental Mosaicism Detection and Preimplantation Genetic Testing in Families with Multiple Transmissions of De Novo Mutations.

Discrepancy of QF-PCR, CMA and Karyotyping on a De Novo Case of Mosaic Isodicentric Y Chromosomes

[Prenatal diagnosis for two fetuses carrying partial deletion of Y chromosome]

Detectionof Fetal Trisomy 8 Mosaicism with Cell-free Fetal DNA in Maternal Plasma

[Genetic Analysis of a Case with Mosaicism Complex Structural Aberration of Chromosome 18].

[Clinical and Genetic Analysis of a Fetus with 17q12 Microdeletion Syndrome].

Prenatal Diagnosis of Trisomy 8 Mosaicism, Initially Identified by Cffdna Screening

Case Report: Identification of Maternal Low-Level Mosaicism in the Dystrophin Gene by Droplet Digital Polymerase Chain Reaction

High frequency of Y chromosome microdeletions in male infertility patients with 45,X/46,XY mosaicism

Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Mosaicism in 18,369 Cases of Amniocentesis

Sperm Chromosome Analysis and Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis in an Infertile Male with Mosaic Trisomy 18

Clinical and molecular cytogenetic findings and pregnancy outcomes of fetuses with isochromosome Y

Prenatal Diagnosis of Chromosomal Mosaicism in Over 18,000 Pregnancies: A Five-Year Single-Tertiary-Center Retrospective Analysis

Molecular cytogenetic characterization of a mosaic small supernumerary marker chromosome derived from chromosome Y in an azoospermic male: A case report

[Mosaic trisomy 20: discrepancy between cyto-and molecular genetic technologies in prenatal diagnosis]

Genetic Analysis of 153 Fetus with Yq11.21 Yq11.221 Yq11.222 Yq11.223 Yq11.223 Deletions and Duplications

Mosaic distal 10q deletion or 46,XY,del(10) (q26.13)/46,XY at amniocentesis and cordocentesis in a pregnancy associated with cytogenetic discrepancy between cultured amniocytes and uncultured amniocytes, perinatal progressive decrease of the aneuploid cell line and a favorable fetal outcome

Next-generation Sequencing Analysis of Embryos from Mosaic Patients Undergoing in Vitro Fertilization and Preimplantation Genetic Testing.