Predictors of Inappropriately Rapid Coronary Lesion Progression in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions

Gal Sella,Ortal Tuvali,Michael Welt,Igor Volodarsky,Mustafa Jaber,Haitham Abu Khadija,David Koren,Dan Haberman,Lion Poles,Alex Blatt,Michael Jonas,Oscar H Kracoff,Gera Gandelman,Jacob George
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjco.2023.07.002
2023-07-06
CJC Open
Abstract:Background: Patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may experience rapid atherosclerotic plaque progression in nontreated vessels that is unlikely to result from natural de novo atherosclerosis. We hypothesize that intra-lesion bleeding plays a central role in this process. The aim of this study is to investigate the factors that may contribute to accelerated narrowing in coronary diameter. Methods: We reviewed 65 interventional procedures and their consequent staged PCIs and mapped the coronary tree into 16 segments (as divided by the American Heart Association), grading the percentage of stenosis in each segment and spotting the rapidly progressing lesions. Demographic, procedural, and laboratory data were recorded and analyzed. Results: For the lesions that progressed rapidly in the time period between angiographies, the administration of eptifibatide intra-procedurally was associated with rapid progression of coronary lesions. Moreover, an increased white blood cell count prior to the index procedure was also associated with a trend toward rapid plaque progression. Conclusions: In this hypothesis-generating study, treatment with a IIb/IIIa inhibitor in the index PCI was associated with an accelerated short-term progression of some of the nontreated lesions, suggesting that this mode of anti-aggregation therapy could facilitate plaque hemorrhage and consequent acceleration of coronary atherosclerosis in eroded plaques.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?