Collision-Free Communication in Sensor Networks

S. Kulkarni,Umamaheswaran Arumugam

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-45032-7_2

2003-06-24

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Cervical Total Disc Replacement is Superior to Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials

Yujie Zhang,Chengzhen Liang,Yiqing Tao,Xiaopeng Zhou,Hao Li,Fangcai Li,Qixin Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0117826

IF: 3.7

2015-01-01

PLoS ONE

Abstract:BackgroundDespite being considered the standard surgical procedure for symptomatic cervical disc disease, anterior cervical decompression and fusion invariably accelerates adjacent segment degeneration. Cervical total disc replacement is a motion-preserving procedure developed as a substitute to fusion. Whether cervical total disc replacement is superior to fusion remains unclear.MethodsWe comprehensively searched PubMed, EMBASE, Medline, and the Cochrane Library in accordance with the inclusion criteria to identify possible studies. The retrieved results were last updated on December 12, 2014. We classified the studies as short-term and midterm follow-up.ResultsNineteen randomized controlled trials involving 4516 cases were identified. Compared with anterior cervical decompression and fusion, cervical total disc replacement had better functional outcomes (neck disability index [NDI], NDI success, neurological success, neck pain scores reported on a numerical rating scale [NRS], visual analog scales scores and overall success), greater segmental motion at the index level, fewer adverse events and fewer secondary surgical procedures at the index and adjacent levels in short-term follow-up (P < 0.05). With midterm follow-up, the cervical total disc replacement group indicated superiority in the NDI, neurological success, pain assessment (NRS), and secondary surgical procedures at the index level (P < 0.05). The Short Form 36 (SF-36) and segmental motion at the adjacent level in the short-term follow-up showed no significant difference between the two procedures, as did the secondary surgical procedure rates at the adjacent level with midterm follow-up (P > 0.05).ConclusionsCervical total disc replacement presented favorable functional outcomes, fewer adverse events, and fewer secondary surgical procedures. The efficacy and safety of cervical total disc replacement are superior to those of fusion. Longer-term, multicenter studies are required for a better evaluation of the long-term efficacy and safety of the two procedures.
Multilevel Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Long-Term Outcomes at 3 and 4 Levels

Matthew F Gornet,Francine W Schranck,Katrine M Sorensen,Anne G Copay

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/7090

Abstract:Background: Multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease in 2 or more segments poses treatment challenges. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is a viable treatment option, but one with high rates of adjacent segment disease and pseudoarthrosis. Cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of 1- and 2-level cervical pathology, with established long-term safety and effectiveness. Limited evidence exists for CDA at more than 2 levels. This study investigates the long-term outcomes of 3- and 4-level CDA out to 7 years. Methods: In a retrospective review of prospectively collected data, patient demographics and surgical characteristics were collected. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) were collected preoperatively and at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months postoperatively, and annually thereafter, including: Neck Disability Index (NDI), numeric rating scales for neck pain and arm pain, the Veterans Rand 12-item Health Survey physical component summary (PCS) score and mental component summary (MCS) score, and patient satisfaction scores. Secondary surgery data were also collected. Predictive methods using mixed-effects regression models were used to analyze the data. Results: Data for 139 CDAs were available for evaluation (n = 116 three-level and n = 23 four-level). Statistical improvement was shown for all PRO scores at all postoperative intervals (P < .001). From preoperatively to 7 years postoperatively, mean NDI decreased from 57.9 to 31.3 (45.9% improvement), mean neck pain decreased from 15.6 to 7.9 (49.4% improvement), mean arm pain decreased from 12.2 to 5.6 (54.1% improvement), mean PCS increased from 29.2 to 41.4 (41.8% improvement), and mean MCS increased from 37.1 to 44.5 (19.9% improvement). Five (3.6%) 3-level patients underwent secondary surgery. Patient satisfaction exceeded 88% 7 years after surgery. Conclusion: Statistical improvement in PROs, with a low rate of secondary surgeries out to 7 years, demonstrates that 3- and 4-level CDA may be performed safely and effectively in appropriately selected patients. Level of evidence: 4.
Clinical and Radiologic Features of 3 Reconstructive Procedures for the Surgical Management of Patients with Bilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease at a Minimum Follow-Up Period of 5 Years: A Comparative Study

Kai-Feng Wang,Shuo Duan,Zhen-Qi Zhu,Hai-Ying Liu,Chen-Jun Liu,Shuai Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.157

IF: 2.21

2018-01-01

World Neurosurgery

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To assess the mid-long-term follow-up of the safety and efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) and hybrid surgery (HS) for bilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (cDDD). METHODS: 77 patients who underwent ACDF, HS, and CADR were retrospectively reviewed. Clinical effects were evaluated based on Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scores and the Odom criteria. Radiographic outcomes were evaluated, including cervical range of motion (ROM), ROM in the operative and adjacent segments, incidence of degeneration in the adjacent segments (ASD), and heterotopic ossification (HO). RESULTS: NDI, VAS, and JOA scores significantly improved in all patients after surgery without significant differences between groups. The excellent-to-good ratio in the Odom scale was 28/30 for the HS group, 30/33 for the ACDF group, and 13/14 for the CADR group. No significant differences in clinical outcomes or complication were found between groups (F > 0.05). Furthermore, the HS and CADR groups had less decreased ROM in the cervical and operative segments and less compensatory ROM in adjacent segments (P < 0.05). By contrast, the ACDF group had decreased ROM in the cervical and operative segments and significantly increased ROM in adjacent segments (P < 0.05). Moreover, the incidence of ASD was higher in the ACDF group, but the difference was not statistically significant (P> 0.05). HO was found in 10 patients (33.3%) in the HS group and 5 patients (35.7%) in the CADR group. CONCLUSION: HS was superior to ACDF with regard to equivalent clinical outcomes in the mid-long-term follow-up. Furthermore, HS was superior in the maintenance of ROM and had less impact on its adjacent segments. The efficacy of HS is similar to that of CADR.
Motion Analysis of Single‐Level Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty: A Meta‐Analysis

Jian Chen,Shun-wu Fan,Xin-wei Wang,Wen Yuan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7861.2012.00176.x

2012-01-01

Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract:OBJECTIVE:The purpose of this review was to investigate whether cervical total disc arthroplasty (CTDA) preserves motion of the treated level and what its effect is on adjacent segments.METHODS:Relevant published reports were collected from PubMed, Medline and Cochrane library. The original studies were considered eligible only if the range of motion (ROM) of the index or adjacent level had been investigated. A meta-analysis was then performed on the collected data. Statistical heterogeneity across the various trials was tested using Cochran's Q statistic and I (2) ; in the case of heterogeneity, a random effect model was used.RESULTS:The weighted mean differences (WMDs) of the index level were 0.34 (95% confidence interval [CI], -0.53∼1.21, P = 0.440) and 0.23 (95% CI, -1.92∼2.38, P = 0.834) in all included studies and randomized control trials (RCTs), respectively. The WMDs of the cranial adjacent levels, caudal adjacent levels and whole cervical spines were 1.01 (95% CI, 0.55∼1.47, P = 0.000), 1.10 (95% CI, 0.61∼1.59, P = 0.000) and 3.40 (95% CI, -6.02∼12.82, P = 0.479), respectively.CONCLUSION:These findings suggest that the protective effect against adjacent segment degeneration provided by cervical arthroplasty might not be as good as has been believed. Long-term supporting evidence is still needed.
Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results Between Cervical Artificial Disk Replacement and Anterior Cervical Fusion A 6-Year Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Study

Wei Tian,Kai Yan,Xiao Han,Jie Yu,Peihao Jin,Xiaoguang Han

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/bsd.0000000000000206

2017-01-01

Abstract:Study Design: Prospective nonrandomized comparative study.Objective: To compare the long-term clinical and radiographic results of cervical artificial disk replacement (CADR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and to provide our evidence if CADR could reduce adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).Summary of Background Data: CADR is widely used in spine surgery today. Despite the short-term results of it having been ascertained, the long-term results are still under observation. Meanwhile it is still debatable if CADR could reduce ASD in the long run.Materials and Methods: Sixty-three patients with cervical myelopathy who underwent CADR (28) or ACDF (35) with a minimum follow-up of 68 months were included. Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, neck disability index, and Odom's scale were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were used to evaluate the radiographic outcomes.Results: Both CADR and ACDF groups showed significant improvement on Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores and neck disability index, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The sagittal alignment was maintained for both the groups. The C2-C7 range of motion had no significant change for CADR group, whereas it significantly decreased for ACDF group. The range of motion at index level of CADR patients decreased from 9.5 +/- 3.7 degrees before surgery to 7.0 +/- 3.0 degrees at 3 months after surgery (P < 0.001), and it was maintained to 6.6 +/- 4.1 degrees at last follow-up without significant decrease (P = 0.448). We used radiographic data to evaluate ASD and we found the incidence of ASD was significantly lower for CADR group than ACDF group.Conclusions: The clinical and radiographic results of CADR over 6-year follow-up are basically satisfying. Compared with ACDF, CADR could better preserve physiological motion and biomechanics of cervical spine, and reduce the occurrence of ASD.
Anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery for cervicogenic headache: A multicenter prospective cohort study

Liang Yang,Yongchao Li,Chen Dai,Xiaodong Pang,Duanming Li,Ye Wu,Xiongsheng Chen,Baogan Peng

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2022.1064976

IF: 3.4

2022-11-25

Frontiers in Neurology

Abstract:Background: Cervicogenic headache (CEH) has long been recognized as a referred pain deriving from pathological changes in the upper cervical nerves. However, previous clinical studies found that anterior lower cervical discectomy for the treatment of cervical myelopathy and/or radiculopathy can also help relieve associated headaches. To date, there is still a lack of large sample and prospective study to investigate the effect of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) on CEH associated with cervical spondylosis. Methods: A total of 656 patients with cervical radiculopathy and/or myelopathy were enrolled in three spinal centers. Among them, 221 patients who were diagnosed with CEH were collected in this study, and 204 completed a 1-year follow-up. The primary endpoint was headache intensity during a 12-month follow-up period measured by the numeric pain rating scale (NPRS). The secondary outcome measures included headache frequency, headache duration, and the neck disability index (NDI). Results: Among all 204 patients with CEH who completed a 1-year follow-up, 166 received anterior cervical surgery (surgery group) and 38 received conservative treatment (conservative group). There were statistically significant lower NPRS in the surgical group during follow-up. Between-group differences showed that NPRS in the surgery group was significantly greater improvement at 1 month (2.8, 95% CI: 2.0, 3.6), 3 months (2.6, 95% CI: 1.8, 3.4), 6 months (2.4, 95% CI: 1.6, 3.2), and 12 months (1.5, 95% CI: 0.7, 2.4) ( p < 0.05 for all). There were statistically significant lower NDI, less frequent headaches, and lower headache duration in the surgery group during follow-up ( p < 0.05 for all). Conclusion: This study indicates that ACDF can effectively relieve CEH associated with cervical myelopathy and/or radiculopathy.

neurosciences,clinical neurology
Antagonistic effects of ultra-low-molecular-weight heparin on Aβ25–35-induced apoptosis in cultured rat cortical neurons

L. Hao,Qing-zhu Zhang,Tian-gui Yu,Yan-na Cheng,Sheng-li Ji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.10.064

IF: 3.61

2011-01-12

Brain Research

Abstract:
One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years

MATTHEW F. GORNET,TODD H. LANMAN,J. KENNETH BURKUS,SCOTT D. HODGES,JEFFREY R. MCCONNELL,RANDALL F. DRYER,FRANCINE W. SCHRANCK,ANNE G. COPAY

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14444/6076

2019-12-01

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) have been used to treat degenerative disc disease at single as well as multiple cervical levels. This study compares the safety and efficacy of 1-level versus 2-level CDA and ACDF.METHODS: In total, 545 and 397 patients with degenerative disc disease were studied in 1-level and 2-level Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved clinical trials, respectively: CDA (n = 280 and 209), ACDF (n = 265 and 188). Data from these studies were used to compare 1- versus 2-level procedures: the propensity score method was used to adjust for potential confounding effects, and adjusted mean outcome safety and efficacy scores at 2 and 7 years postsurgery were compared between 1-level and 2-level procedures within treatment type.RESULTS: One-level and 2-level procedures had similar rates of improvement in overall success and patient-reported outcomes scores for both CDA and ACDF. There were no statistical differences in rates of implant-related adverse events (AEs) or serious implant-related AEs between 1-level and 2-level CDA. The 7-year rate of implant-related AEs was higher for 2-level than 1-level ACDF (27.7% vs 18.9%, P ≤ .036), though the rates of serious implant-related AEs between ACDF groups did not differ significantly. Secondary surgery rates were not statistically different between 1-level and 2-level procedures (CDA or ACDF) at the index or adjacent levels at 2 or 7 years. Grade IV heterotopic ossification at 7 years was reported in 4.6% of 1-level CDA patients and 8.6%/7.3% at the superior/inferior levels, respectively, of 2-level CDA patients.CONCLUSIONS: One- and 2-level CDA appear equally safe and effective in the treatment of cervical degenerative disc disease. Two-level ACDF appears to be as effective as 1-level ACDF but with a higher rate of some AEs at long-term follow-up.LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2.CLINICAL TRIALS: clinicaltrials.gov: NCT00667459, NCT00642876, and NCT00637156.
Outcomes following two-level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Relative to two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy

Philip P Ratnasamy,Michael J Gouzoulis,Sahir S Jabbouri,Arya G Varthi,Jonathan N Grauer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000005131

2024-08-27

Abstract:Study design: Retrospective cohort study. Objective: To evaluate postoperative adverse events, readmissions, and five-year survival to reoperation for two-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) relative to two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). Background: CDA and ACDF are both treatment options for degenerative cervical spine pathology. Relative to ACDF, CDA is a relatively novel treatment option, and limited research exists comparing outcomes between two-level CDA and two-level ACDF. Methods: Patients undergoing two-level CDA or two-level ACDF were isolated from the PearlDiver M165Ortho database. These two cohorts were matched 1:1 based on patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores. The odds of 90-day postoperative adverse events were compared between the two groups by multivariable analysis. Overall cost-of-care for the first 90-days postoperatively, and five-year survival to cervical spine reoperation were then assessed. Results: Of the two-level cases identified, only 3.9% had CDA and the rest had ACDF. After matching, there were 4,224 patients in each of the study groups. With controlling for patient age, sex, and ECI on multivariable analysis, two-level CDA patients had significantly lower odds of experiencing 90-day dysphagia (OR 0.60, P<0.0001 driving aggregated any adverse event [OR 0.65, P<0.0001]) and readmission (OR 0.69, P=0.0002). Median 90-day cost of care was greater for two-level ACDF patients ($4,776.00 vs. $3,191.00, P<0.0001). No significant difference in five-year survival to cervical spine reoperation was identified (P=0.7). Conclusions: Relative to two-level ACDF patients, two-level CDA patients were found to have significantly lower odds of 90-day readmissions and minor adverse events (dysphagia), while rates of major adverse events (pulmonary embolism, deep vein thrombosis, sepsis, etc.) were comparable between the groups. Further CDA patients had lower cost of overall care, but no difference in five-year survival to cervical spine reoperation. Thus, it may be appropriate to further consider CDA when two-level surgery is pursued.
[Long-Term Clinical Efficacy of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy].

Qingpeng Song,Wei Tian,Da He,Xiao Han,Ning Zhang,Jinchao Wang,Zuchang Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.201712045

2018-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the long-term efficacy and influencing factors of cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) for patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). Methods:The data of 29 CSR patients who underwent Bryan artificial disc replacement between December 2003 and December 2007 and followed up more than 10 years were retrospectively analysed. There were 16 males and 13 females with an average age of 54.1 years (range, 40-70 years). The disease duration was 2-144 months (mean, 19.2 months). CT and MRI were performed before operation to identify the compression segments (C 3, 4 in 2 cases, C 4, 5 in 6 cases, C 5, 6 in 18 cases, C 6, 7 in 3 cases) and the compression factors. According to the compression factor, the patients were divided into 2 groups: 14 patients with cervical disc herniation were in the group A and 15 patients combined with osteophyte were in the group B. There was no significant difference in gender, age, disease duration, and compressed level between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The radiographic and clinical evaluation indexes were recorded before operation and at last follow-up. The radiographic evaluation indexes included the global cervical and segmental range of motion (ROM), loss of ROM (ROM<3°) at last follow-up, Cobb angle and incidence of local kyphosis, paravertebral ossification (PO) grading. The clinical evaluation indexes included neck disability index (NDI) and overall efficacy (Odom's score). Results:All patients were followed up 121-153 months (mean, 130 months). The results of radiographic evaluation indexes showed that within group comparison, except that the Cobb angle of the operated level was significantly decreased ( P<0.05) in both 2 groups, there was no significant difference in global cervical ROM and segmental ROM between preoperation and last follow-up ( P>0.05). Except that the loss of ROM (ROM<3°) at last follow-up and high-grade PO at last follow-up in group B were significantly higher than those in group A ( P<0.05), there was no significant difference in other radiographic evaluation indexes between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The results of clinical evaluation indexes showed that the NDI was significantly improved in both groups ( P<0.05) at last follow-up. There was no significant difference in the NDI at preoperation and at last follow-up, the decline of NDI at last follow-up, and the overall efficacy evaluated by Odom's score between 2 groups ( P>0.05). The excellent and good rate of overall efficacy reached 100% in both groups. Conclusion:CADR has satisfied long-term efficacy in treating CSR. The maintenance of segmental mobility was better in patients with disc herniation than in patients with disc herniation and osteophyte.
Comparison of the Mid-Term Follow-Up Results Between Bryan Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

TIAN Wei,YAN Kai,HAN Xiao,YU Jie,JIN Pei-hao,HAN Xiao-guang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2013.02.001

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the mid-term tollow-up results of cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) for cervical degenerative disc disease,and to explore whether it can reduce the occurrence of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).Methods A prospective comparative study of 93 patients who underwent CADR or anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disc disease were conducted.All patients were followed up for more than 6 years.The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score,neck disability index (NDI),Odom's scale,X-rays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to evaluate the clinical and radiologic results.Results Twenty eight patients who underwent CADR and 35 patients who underwent ACDF had complete follow-up data.At final follow-up,the JOA score and NDI improved significantly in both groups.Between the two groups,there was no significant difference in terms of JOA score,NDI and Odom's scale.The sagittal alignment was well maintained in both groups.The total cervical spine range of motion (ROM) had no significant change for the CADR group,whereas,it significantly decreased for the ACDF group.The ROM at the replacement level of CADR patients decreased from 9.5° ± 3.7° before operation to 7.0° ± 3.0° 3 months after operation,and it was maintained to 6.6° ± 4.1° at final follow-up without significant decrease.Lateral radiographs and T2-weighted MRI showed the incidence of ASD in CADR group was significantly lower than that in ACDF group.Conclusion The six-year follow-up results of CADR are basically satisfactory.Compared with ACDF,it could better preserve physiological motion and biomechanics of cervical spine,and reduce the incidence of ASD.
Med-and long-term clinical results of cervical artificial disc replacement with different image diagnosis and symptom diagnosis

Xiao HAN,Wei TIAN,Bo LIU,Da HE,Yanwei LV,Kai YAN,Han WANG,Mingxing FAN

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.2095-9958.2015.01-004

2015-01-01

Abstract:Background:Cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR) is designed to preserve of normal motion and biomechanics in cer-vical spine, and has been widely used to treat cervical degenerative disease for more than ten years, but there still are some debates about whether degenerative cervical canal stenosis (DCCS) patients and cervical myelopathy patients are suitable for CADR. Objective:The purpose of the study is to explore clinical results of CADR with different image diagnosis (DCCS and cervi-cal disc herniation [CDH]) and symptom diagnosis (myelopathy and radiculopathy). Methods:A total of 74 discs were implanted into 65 patients between March 2004 and April 2007. There were 44 males and 21 females with an average age of (44.9±8.0) years (range, 25-70 years). The average period of follow-up was (78.8±12.1) months (range, 56.8-108.0 months). According to preoperative CT and MRI, 36 patients were diagnosed as DCCS and 29 patients with CDH. According to patient's symptoms and physical examination, 49 patients were diagnosed as cervical my-elopathy, 14 were cervical radiculopathy and 2 were sympathetic cervical spondylosis. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score and neck disability index (NDI) were used to assess clinical outcomes. Range of motion (ROM) of affected cer-vical segments was compared before surgery and at the last follow-up. Results:The ROM was 9.3° ± 4.0° and 10.7° ± 4.0° in DCCS and CDH patients at the last follow-up, respectively, and there was no significant difference in ROM between the patients. The improvement rate of JOA score was 88.9%and 73.9%in CDH and DCCS patients, respectively (P<0.05). However, There was no significant difference in the improvement rate of JOA score between the myelopathy and radiculopathy type patients. Conclusions:Clinical outcomes and segmental ROM can be well preserved in DCCS patients diagnosed by imaging or clini-cal symptoms during long-term follow-up. CDH is the best indication for CADR. DCCS and cervical myelopathy are also indicated for CADR.
Medium and long term result of the single level cervical disc arthroplasty for cervical spondylosis meylopathy

ZHANG Xuesong,ZHANG Yonggang,XIAO Songhua

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1004-406X.2012.10.05

2012-01-01

Abstract:Objectives: To investigate the medium and long term clinical outcome of the single level cervical disc arthroplasty(CDA) vs anterior cervical decompression and fusion(ACDF) in a randomized controlled study.Methods: The medium and long term clinical outcome of the single level Bryan prosthesis CDA(experimental group) and conventional ACDF(controlled group) was reviewed retrospectively.All the patients participated in a randomized controlled prospective study from 2003 to 2005,the inclusive criteria for cervical disc arthroplasty was used in 80 cases,and 32 patients was in CDA group and 35 patients in ACDF group finished the clinical and imaging follow-up(range,7-9 years).The range of movement(ROM) in operation segement was determined by dynamic X-ray.The heterotopic ossification around the prosthesis was determined according to McAfee classification,the adjacent segment degeneration was verified according to Miyazaki classification on MRI T2 weighted images,and the symptom improvement was determined by NDI and VAS score.Results: The postoperative follow-up averaged 8.8 years,ranging from 7.2 to 9.6 years.No prosthesis displacement occurred in CDA group.Range of motion in CDA group averaged 6.35°±1.45°,ranging from 1.20° to 8.20°.The heterotopic ossification around the prosthesis was noted in 8 of 32(25%) segments,which induced loss of motion in 2 cases.3 patients underwent the revision surgery due to 1 cranial adjacent segment degeneration and canal stenosis caused by ossification next to adjacent segment in 2 cases.The adjacent disc degeneration was noted as deterioration of 1 grade in 22 and 2 grade in 8 of the rest 63 segments,but remained asymptomatic.3 patients underwent revision surgery in ACDF group,with cranial disc degeneration and neurological deficit in 2 and spinal cord compression due to caudal disc degeneration in 1.The adjacent disc degeneration was noted as deterioration of 1 grade in 34 and 2 grade in 15 of the rest 67 segments,but remained asymptomatic.The NDI,VAS score for neck and upper limb at final follow-up in CDA group was 16.83±3.12,1.17±0.41 and 1.96±0.51 respectively;while in ACDF group,it was 17.21±3.53,1.23±0.35 and 1.86±0.62 respectively.There was significant improvement compared with pre-operation,but no statistical difference between 2 groups(P>0.05).Conclusions: No significant difference of medium and long term outcome exists between cervical disc arthroplasty and ACDF,while the former can maintain the ROM of involved segment as well as preventing ASD,which is optional for single level cervical spondylosis meylopathy.
A 10-Year Follow-Up Study of Indications for Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement

X Han,Q L Wang,F,B Liu,D He,W Tian

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112137-20201022-02908

2021-01-01

Abstract:Objective:To investigate the influence of the preoperative factors on the segmental range of motion (ROM) during long-term follow-up after artificial cervical disc replacement (ACDR), so as to further improve the selection of surgical indications for ACDR.Methods:Retrospective analysis was performed on 71 patients with cervical degenerative diseases who underwent single-segment Bryan ACDR in Beijing Jishuitan Hosptial from December 2003 to December 2008, and a 10-year clinical follow-up was conducted. Among the patients, 44 were males and 27 were females, with a mean age of (45±8) years at operation. The mean follow-up time was (129±14) months. Preoperative and follow-up imaging evaluation including measurement of the segmental range of motion (ROM) by cervical X-ray, and preoperative height of intervertebral space was measured by cervical lateral X-ray. According to CT and coronal reconstruction, the grade of paravertebral ossification (PO) was assessed. Clinical symptoms assessment including the Japanese Orthopaedic Association scoring (JOA), the Neck Disability Index (NDI) evaluation was performed preoperatively. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the influencing factors of the range of motion of the surgical segment during follow-up. The best cut-off value was calculated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.Results:The preoperative and follow-up ROM at the operated segment was 9.7°±4.5° and 8.7°±5.4°, respectively ( P>0.05). Univariate analysis revealed that the postoperative segmental ROM was not significantly correlated with the factors including the surgical level, gender, age, and preoperative clinical diagnosis (1: Radiculopathy; 2: Myelopathy; 3: Mixed type), preoperative segmental ROM, preoperative JOA score and preoperative NDI score (all P>0.05), and was significantly correlated with imaging diagnosis (1: cervical disc herniation; 2: degenerative cervical stenosis), preoperative PO grade (both P<0.05). The multi-factor analysis showed that preoperative segmental ROM ( OR=1.228, 95% CI:1.012-1.489, P<0.05) and PO grade ( OR=0.190, 95% CI: 0.085-0.424, P<0.05) had significance in the overall test, but imaging diagnosis had no significance in the overall test ( P>0.05). The optimal cutoff value of preoperative segmental ROM and PO grade was 9.185° and grade 2.5 assessed by ROC curve, and the area under the ROC curve was 0.86 and 0.72, respectively. Conclusions:ACDR surgery can achieve satisfactory long-term effects for patients with nerve root type, spinal cord type and mixed type cervical degenerative diseases, and effectively retain the overall ROM of the cervical spine and the ROM of replacement segments. Patients with good preoperative segmental ROM and lower PO levels have a greater chance of obtaining good segmental ROM in the long-term postoperatively.
Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Noncontiguous Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: Results of Mid‐ to Long‐Term Follow‐up

Ting‐kui Wu,Jun‐bo He,Kang‐kang Huang,Xin Rong,Chen Ding,Bei‐yu Wang,Hao Liu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/os.13900

2023-09-23

Orthopaedic Surgery

Abstract:Noncontiguous cervical disc degenerative disease (CDDD) is a unique form of multilevel CDDD, characterized by segments with significant degeneration at both ends (C3/4, C5/6, C6/7) and an intermediate segment (C4/5) showing no apparent degeneration. The utilization of cervical disc arthroplasty with or without fusion is a potential effective approach for its treatment. Objective The long‐term results of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) for noncontiguous cervical degenerative disc disease (CDDD) are still uncertain. Moreover, it is unclear whether CDA delays or avoids the degeneration of the intermediate segment (IS), leading to controversy in the field. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the mid‐ to long‐term clinical and radiographic outcomes of CDA in treating noncontiguous CDDD and to explore whether the IS degenerated faster after CDA than other non‐surgically treated adjacent segments. Methods We retrospectively analyzed patients with noncontiguous CDDD who underwent CDA in our department between January 2008 and July 2018. The patients were divided into the CDA and hybrid surgery (HS) groups, and clinical and radiographic outcomes were evaluated at routine postoperative intervals. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA), neck disability index (NDI), and visual analogue scale (VAS), while radiographic outcomes included cervical lordosis (CL), C2‐C7 range of motion (ROM), segmental ROM, and disc angle (DA) at the arthroplasty level. Complications were also evaluated.Pre‐ and postoperative values were compared using paired t‐tests or Wilcoxon rank‐sum tests. Independent Student t‐tests or Mann–Whitney U tests analyzed continuous data between CDA and HS groups, while chi‐square or Fisher exact tests assessed categorical data. Results Sixty‐four patients with noncontiguous CDDD, with 31 in the CDA group and 33 in the HS group, were evaluated. The mean follow‐up time was over 70 months. The most frequently involved levels were C4/5 and C5/6. Both groups showed significant improvements in JOA, NDI, and VAS values after surgery. Although CL was maintained, the CL in the CDA group was consistently lower than that in the HS group (p

orthopedics
Cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Hua Jiang,Zezhang Zhu,Yong Qiu,Bangping Qian,Xusheng Qiu,Mingliang Ji

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1401-7

IF: 2.928

2012-01-01

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Abstract:To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease.We identified eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in PubMed (April 2011), EMBASE (April 2011) and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (April 2011). Data were collected and extracted by two reviewers independently. The methodological quality and clinical relevance of the included studies were assessed. Data analysis was conducted with RevMan 5.0.Six RCTs involving 1,745 patients were included. The pooled analysis showed a higher prevalence of neurological and overall success [(P = 0.004, RR = 1.06, 95% CI = 1.02-1.10), (P = 0.0005, RR = 1.14, 95% CI = 1.06-1.22)], and a lower incidence of dysphagia and reoperation related to adjacent-segment degeneration [(P = 0.04, RR = 0.30, 95% CI = 0.09-0.97), (P = 0.03, RR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.23-0.91)] with CDA compared to ACDF. However, there was no statistical difference in neck disability index (P = 0.92, SMD = 0.01, 95% CI = -0.25 to 0.27), neck and arm pain scores[(P = 0.33, SMD = -0.12, 95% CI = -0.37 to 0.13), (P = 0.54, SMD = 0.17, 95% CI = -0.36 to 0.70)], incidence of complications related to the implant or surgical procedure and reoperation related to primary surgery [(P = 0.32, RR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.45-1.30), (P = 0.09, RR = 0.48, 95% CI = 0.20-1.12)].Compared with ACDF, CDA carry a lower incidence of dysphagia complications and reoperation related to adjacent-segment degeneration, and a higher prevalence of neurological and overall success at 2 years postoperatively. As the poor quality of the included studies, it is still uncertain whether CDR is more effective and safer than ACDF treating single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease. Future large-scale RCTs with long-term follow-up are needed to provide clear evidence.
"Griseofulvin" in clinical cases of ringworm in calves.

O. Gautam,I. S. Chandna,S. Datt

Abstract:
Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial disc replacement for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis

Chao-Jui Chang,Yuan-Fu Liu,Yu-Meng Hsiao,Yi-Hung Huang,Keng-Chang Liu,Ruey-Mo Lin,Cheng-Li Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3171/2022.2.SPINE211500

2022-04-22

Abstract:Objective: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has long been regarded as a gold standard in the treatment of cervical myelopathy. Subsequently, cervical artificial disc replacement (c-ADR) was developed and provides the advantage of motion preservation at the level of the intervertebral disc surgical site, which may also reduce stress at adjacent levels. The goal of this study was to compare clinical and functional outcomes in patients undergoing ACDF with those in patients undergoing c-ADR for cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM). Methods: A systematic literature review and meta-analysis were performed using the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases from database inception to November 21, 2021. The authors compared Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-36, and Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores; complication rates; and reoperation rates for these two surgical procedures in CSM patients. The Mantel-Haenszel method and variance-weighted means were used to analyze outcomes after identifying articles that met study inclusion criteria. Results: More surgical time was consumed in the c-ADR surgery (p = 0.04). Shorter hospital stays were noted in patients who had undergone c-ADR (p = 0.04). Patients who had undergone c-ADR tended to have better NDI scores (p = 0.02) and SF-36 scores (p = 0.001). Comparable outcomes in terms of JOA scores (p = 0.24) and neurological success rate (p = 0.12) were noted after the surgery. There was no significant between-group difference in the overall complication rates (c-ADR: 18% vs ACDF: 25%, p = 0.17). However, patients in the ACDF group had a higher reoperation rate than patients in the c-ADR group (4.6% vs 1.5%, p = 0.02). Conclusions: At the midterm follow-up after treatment of CSM, better functional outcomes as reflected by NDI and SF-36 scores were noted in the c-ADR group than those in the ACDF group. c-ADR had the advantage of retaining range of motion at the level of the intervertebral disc surgical site without causing more complications. A large sample size with long-term follow-up studies may be required to confirm these findings in the future.
Long-term Outcomes of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement for Patients with Degenerative Cervical Canal Stenosis

Han Xiao,Tian Wei,Liu Bo,He Da,Song Qingpeng,Zhang Ning,Wang Jinchao,Feng Xiao,Li Zuchang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2352.2019.04.006

2019-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the long-term efficacy of cervical artificial disc replacement for patients with degenerative cervical canal stenosis.Methods All of 43 patienta underwent single level Bryan cervical artificial disc replacement for degenerative cervical canal stenosis were retrospectively analyzed with a minimum 10 years follow-up in our hospital between December 2003 and December 2007.There were 28 males and 15 females with an average age of 56.7 ± 8.0 years which ranged from 37 to 76 including 1 case of C3.4 level,11 xases of ~ level,26 cases of C~ level and 5 cases of C6,7 level.According to the symptoms and location of compression on radiograph,the patients were divided into 3 groups:15 patients in radiculopathy group,10 patients in myelopathy group and 18 patients in myeloradiculo p~hy group.Radidogical evaluation indexes include global range of motion (ROM),segmental ROM,segmental Cobb angle.Clinical evaluation indexes including Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score,neck disability index (NDI) and Odom's criteria.The variable data were analyzed by one-way ANOVA,the grading data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis H test.The preoperative and postoperative data were analyzed by paired t test.Results At the last follow-up,the Cobb angle of the operative segment was 1.29°±1.34°in myelopathy group(t=4.606,P=0.001),0.71°±2.20°in radiculopathy group (t=2.355,P=0.034),and 0.69°±2.12° in myeloradiculopathy group (t=3.312,P=0.004),which was significantly lower than that before operation.At the last follow-up,ROM of the operative segment in myelopathy group was 6.41 o ±4.87°,which was significantly lower than that before operation (11.46° ±5.19°,t=3.589,P＜ 0.05),and there was no significant difference in the other two groups.There was no significant difference in other imaging parameters among the three groups.JOA scores at the last follow-up were 16.33±0.75 in radiculopathy group (t=5.857,P＜ 0.001),16.00±1.05 in myelopathy group(t=8.337,P＜ 0.001) and 14.78±1.69 in radiculopathy group (t=4.045,P＜ 0.001);NDI were 13.07％±5.90％ in radiculopathy group (t=7.097,P＜ 0.001),12.60％±4.22％ in myelopathy group (t=7.319,P＜ 0.001) and 23.11％±14.18％ in radiculopathy group (t=4.229,P＜ 0.001),which were all significantly improved than those before operation.The excellent and good rate of Odom's criteria (H=2.719,2.411,P＜ 0.05),JOA (LAD-t=3.770,4.080,P＜0,05) and NDI(LAD-t=2.850,2.643,P＜ 0.05) at the last follow-up of the patients in radiculopathy group and myelopathy group were better than those of patients in myeloradiculopathy group (P＜ 0.05).Conclusion Cervical artificial disc replacement has a satisfied long-term clinical efficacy with degenerative cervical canal stenosis.The efficacy of myelopathy and radiculopathy were better than myeloradiculopathy.
[Long-Term Efficacy of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement for Cervical Degenerative Diseases].

Q P Song,W Tian,D He,X Han,N Zhang,J C Wang,Z C Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.issn.0376-2491.2018.17.015

2018-01-01

Abstract:Objective: To evaluate the long-term efficacy of cervical artificial disc replacement for patients with cervical disc herniation and degenerative cervical canal stenosis. Methods: Total of sixty-eight patients underwent single-level Bryan artificial disc replacement in Beijing Jishuitan Hospital from December 2003 to December 2007 with a minimum 10-year follow-up were retrospectively analyzed. There were 43 males and 25 females with a mean age of (46±8) years. According to preoperative CT and MRI, the patients were divided into two groups: 27 patients in cervical disc herniation group and 41 patients in degenerative cervical canal stenosis group. The evaluation indexes before surgery and at last follow-up were compared between two groups. The clinical indexes included Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI) and Odom's grade; and the radiological indexes included the global and segmental range of motion (ROM), Cobb's angle at operated level. The continuous variable data were analyzed by independent sample t test. Results: In cervical disc herniation group, the improvement rate of JOA score was 83%±22%, NDI% decreased by 14%±9%, and Odom's grade was excellent in 17 patients, good in 10 patients. In degenerative cervical canal stenosis group, the improvement rate of JOA was 68%±34%, NDI% decreased by 11%±7%, and Odom's grade was excellent in 19 patients, good in 18 patients, fair in 4 patients. The segmental ROM was 10°±4° and 7°±6° in cervical disc herniation and degenerative cervical canal stenosis group at last follow-up (t=2.284, P=0.026). The global ROM was 50°±9° and 44°±14° in cervical disc herniation and degenerative cervical canal stenosis group at last follow-up (t=2.112, P=0.038). Conclusions: Cervical artificial disc replacement has a favorable long-term efficacy in treating cervical degenerative diseases. The postoperative global and segmental ROM in patients with cervical disc herniation are better than those in patients with degenerative cervical canal stenosis.

Collision-Free Communication in Sensor Networks

Cervical Total Disc Replacement is Superior to Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized Controlled Trials

Multilevel Cervical Disc Arthroplasty: Long-Term Outcomes at 3 and 4 Levels

Clinical and Radiologic Features of 3 Reconstructive Procedures for the Surgical Management of Patients with Bilevel Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease at a Minimum Follow-Up Period of 5 Years: A Comparative Study

Motion Analysis of Single‐Level Cervical Total Disc Arthroplasty: A Meta‐Analysis

Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results Between Cervical Artificial Disk Replacement and Anterior Cervical Fusion A 6-Year Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Study

Anterior cervical decompression and fusion surgery for cervicogenic headache: A multicenter prospective cohort study

Antagonistic effects of ultra-low-molecular-weight heparin on Aβ25–35-induced apoptosis in cultured rat cortical neurons

One-Level Versus 2-Level Treatment With Cervical Disc Arthroplasty or Fusion: Outcomes Up to 7 Years

Outcomes following two-level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty Relative to two-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy

[Long-Term Clinical Efficacy of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement for Cervical Spondylotic Radiculopathy].

Comparison of the Mid-Term Follow-Up Results Between Bryan Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement and Anterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion for Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease

Med-and long-term clinical results of cervical artificial disc replacement with different image diagnosis and symptom diagnosis

Medium and long term result of the single level cervical disc arthroplasty for cervical spondylosis meylopathy

A 10-Year Follow-Up Study of Indications for Artificial Cervical Disc Replacement

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for the Treatment of Noncontiguous Cervical Degenerative Disc Disease: Results of Mid‐ to Long‐Term Follow‐up

Cervical disc arthroplasty versus fusion for single-level symptomatic cervical disc disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

"Griseofulvin" in clinical cases of ringworm in calves.

Comparison of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus artificial disc replacement for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a meta-analysis

Long-term Outcomes of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement for Patients with Degenerative Cervical Canal Stenosis

[Long-Term Efficacy of Cervical Artificial Disc Replacement for Cervical Degenerative Diseases].