IDEOLOGY IN THE 2004 ELECTION

William G. Jacoby

Abstract:This paper examines the impact of liberal-conservative ideology on voting behavior in the 2004 presidential election. The analysis uses data from the CPS National Election Study for that year. The empirical results show that there was widespread recognition of the candidates’ and parties’ ideological positions within the 2004 electorate. However, liberalconservative identifications exert no direct impact on voting choices. Ideology does exert an indirect effect through its influence on the more proximate determinants of electoral decisions. These findings are not only consistent with earlier results obtained during the 2000 presidential election; they also conform very closely to the basic theoretical structure laid out in The American Voter. This paper examines the role of ideology as a determinant of behavior in the American electorate. The analysis uses data from the 2004 CPS National Election Study and the empirical results are a bit paradoxical. On the one hand, liberal-conservative orientations had no direct impact whatsoever on citizens’ voting choices. On the other hand, the mass public generally seemed fully capable and willing to make ideological distinctions among candidates, issues, and conditions within the external environment. Any interpretations of the 2004 presidential election must take this apparent bifurcation into account. People can use liberal-conservative abstractions to structure their political orientations; however, they choose not to apply them to their voting choices.