R&D Tax Incentives, Intellectual Property Protection and Enterprise Patents Output
Hu Kai,Wu Qing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16538/j.cnki.jfe.2018.04.008
2018-01-01
Abstract:Sporadic data disclosed show that in recent years the scale of China's R&D tax incentives is considerable. As a special form of fiscal expenditure,in terms of the publicity,scarcity and effectiveness of public funds,an important question arises,that is whether lots of R&D tax incentives have an expected innov-ative output effect. In this regard,we propose two hypotheses to be tested. Firstly,R&D tax incentives can (cannot) significantly increase firms' patents output,which is used to directly estimate the patent effect of R&D tax incentives. Secondly,R&D expenditures induced by R&D tax incentives cannot directly increase in-novation output. However,under the protection of intellectual property rights (IPR),R&D expenditures can indirectly increase innovation output. Intellectual property protection (IPP) mitigates the risk of policy failure of R&D tax incentives. The latter hypothesis is used to analyze the mechanism by which R&D tax incentives affect patents output. Next,taking the micro-data of China's manufacturing listed companies from 2009 to 2013 as a sample,it uses appropriate econometric methods to conduct empirical tests. Direct estimates using propensity score matching (PSM) indicate that no matter the total amount of patents or different types of pat-ents,R&D tax incentives do not have a significant effect. Using two-step method,it finds that R&D tax incent-ives can induce enterprises to increase R&D expenditures,but the induced R&D expenditures have no signific-ant impact on the total number of patents. The R&D tax incentives in Chinese context are confronted with the similar dilemma of "Europe Paradox". The reason lies in that the market-oriented industrial R&D policy can-not compel enterprises to engage in projects with high social returns,and the lack of novelty requirement for technological innovation achievements has hindered the enterprises' innovation efforts. But the induced R&D expenditures can effectively increase patents under the adjustment of IPP,meaning that to some extent IPP al-leviates the risk of policy failure that the R&D tax incentives lack the direct patent effect. In the case of inven-tion,the induced R&D expenditures cannot also directly promote patents output,but also indirectly increase the patents output under the adjustment of IPP. For utility model and exterior design,R&D expenditures have no direct or indirect (under the adjustment of IPP) significant impacts. The foregoing conclusions passed the robustness test. In order to improve the innovation effect of R&D tax incentives and get out of the dilemma of"European Paradox",China needs to optimize the policy design of R&D tax incentives,that is invention with the highest degree of novelty in technology,domestic or international new product development or the propor-tion of new product sales are taken as mandatory requirements for enjoying preferential tax policies;and it also should strengthen the IPP's guidance and incentive effects on the formation of technical output by R&D ex-penditures. Compared with the existing research,this paper has certain marginal contributions in three aspects. Firstly,it uses more reasonable indicator to measure R&D tax incentives,namely the intensity of tax incent-ives,which is equal to 1 minus the ratio of the average effective tax rate to the statutory tax rate,is expressed as the ratio of tax preference to pre-tax accounting income. This method can objectively and macroscopically measure the R&D tax incentives enjoyed by Chinese enterprises. Secondly,it adopts more reasonable econo-metric methods. The patent effect of R&D tax incentives is directly estimated by PSM which can overcome the sample self-selectivity. The mechanism of R&D tax incentives' patent effect is estimated by two-step method. First,PSM is used to estimate the additional R&D expenditure effect of R&D tax incentives,and then panel data model is used to estimate the patent output effect of additional R&D expenditures. Thirdly,apart from technical aspect,it also highlights the impact of institutional aspect on the topic. Empirical studies also show that IPP plays a regulatory role in the innovative output effect of the induced R&D expenditures.