Adipocytes as a critical component of the tumor microenvironment.

L. Vona-Davis,L. Gibson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leukres.2013.01.007

2013-05-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Clinical Outcomes after Bilateral Implantation of a Wavefront-Shaping Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOL with Mini-Monovision

Yeo Kyoung Won,Sung Ho Choi,Tae-Young Chung,Dong Hui Lim

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113225

IF: 3.9

2024-05-30

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Abstract:Background: To compare the visual outcomes and optical quality of patients who underwent bilateral implantation of EDOF (AcrySof® IQ Vivity IOL, DFT015) for mini-monovision, trifocal (AcrySof® IQ PanOptix, TNFT00), or monofocal (AcrySof® IQ IOL, SN60WF) IOL. Methods: The monocular-corrected and uncorrected distance visual acuities (CDVA and UDVA, respectively) were evaluated postoperatively at 1 and 3 months. The binocular visual acuity by distance, the binocular defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and patient satisfaction were examined 3 months postoperatively. All patients were asked to complete questionnaires regarding their satisfaction, visual symptoms, and spectacle dependency. Results: This study included 178 eyes from 89 patients. The postoperative binocular UDVA did not differ significantly among the three groups. In the defocus curve, the Vivity group showed better visual acuity over a range of far and intermediate (60 cm) than the other two IOLs groups. In near-vision, the PanOptix group showed the best near-vision, and the Vivity group showed significantly better vision than the IQ group. The Vivity group showed contrast sensitivity and optical quality comparable to the IQ group. Conclusions: The bilateral implantation of AcrySof® IQ Vivity IOL with the mini-monovision approach provided excellent distance and intermediate visual acuity with good near-vision, resulting in high satisfaction.

medicine, general & internal
Clinical Outcomes of a New Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Targeted for Mini-Monovision

Nikola Tomagova,Sina Elahi,Kristof Vandekerckhove

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S405267

2023-03-25

Abstract:Purpose: To assess visual acuity, binocular defocus curve, spectacle independence, and photic phenomena after bilateral same-day cataract surgery with implantation of an extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (IOL) with mini-monovision. Methods: Single-center retrospective study including 124 eyes from 62 patients who underwent bilateral implantation of an isofocal EDOF lens [Isopure® (BVI)] with mini-monovision (-0.50 D). Refraction, visual acuity at different distances, binocular defocus curves, spectacle independence, and subjective ratings of picture-referenced photic phenomena were assessed one to two months postoperatively. Results: The mean postoperative refractive spherical equivalent was -0.15±0.41D in the dominant eyes and -0.46±0.35D in the mini-monovision eyes (p<0.01). Overall, 98.4% and 87.7% of the eyes were within ±1.00D and ±0.50D of the target refraction, respectively. Postoperative monocular corrected distance visual acuity was -0.04±0.07 logMAR. Binocular uncorrected visual acuity was -0.02±0.07, 0.13±0.11and 0.40±0.20 logMAR for far, intermediate and near, respectively. At the visual acuity threshold of 0.20 logMAR (or better) the defocus curve ranged from -1.6D to +0.9D. Reported spectacle-independence was 96% for far distance, 95% for intermediate, and 34% for near. Five percent of patients reported halos, 16% starburst, and 16% glare. Only 7% of all patients considered them bothersome. Conclusion: In patients undergoing same-day bilateral cataract surgery, an isofocal EDOF lens provided an extended range of functional vision, up to 63 cm, resulting in useful uncorrected near vision, good uncorrected intermediate vision, and excellent uncorrected distance vision. Subjective patient satisfaction in terms of spectacle independence and photic phenomena was high.
Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses

Laureano A Rementería-Capelo,Jorge L García-Pérez,Juan Gros-Otero,Virginia Carrillo,Juan Pérez-Lanzac,Inés Contreras

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-020-01563-6

Abstract:Purpose: To report visual outcomes and patient-perceived satisfaction after trifocal or extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a real-world scenario. Methods: Three months after bilateral cataract surgery, corrected and uncorrected visual acuity for far, intermediate and near distances and binocular defocus curves and contrast sensitivity were measured. The patients also completed the Catquest SF-9 questionnaire and reported on dysphotopsia and spectacle use. Results: There were 23 patients in the Symfony, 32 patients in the Finevision and 36 patients in the Panoptix group. The percentage of eyes receiving a toric IOL was 41.2%. There were no differences in uncorrected binocular visual acuities, save for near vision, which was lower in the Symfony group. Binocular defocus curves for the trifocal IOLS were almost identical, while vision achieved with the Symfony IOL was significantly lower starting at - 1.5 D defocus. Contrast sensitivity, as well as the perception of halos and glare and the difficulty for night-driving was similar for all groups, except for contrast sensitivity at 6 cycles per degree, which was lower in the Symfony group compared to both Finevision and Panoptix. For near vision, only 47.6% of the Symfony patients reported being completely spectacle-free, compared to 93.3% and 94.4% for the Finevision and Panoptix groups. Conclusions: Clinically relevant differences were only detected for near vision, with lower values for EDOF IOLs. In order to achieve patient satisfaction, it is imperative to explain the results expected with each IOL; for EDOF IOLs, patients should be advised that they may require near-spectacle correction.
Clinical and aberrometric evaluation of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration

Roberto Bellucci,Miriam Cargnoni,Carlo Bellucci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrs.2019.02.023

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the refractive, visual, and aberrometric results with a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF IOL) based on alternating positive and negative spherical aberration in the central 3.0 mm optical zone and an aspheric monofocal IOL of the same platform. Setting: Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Verona, Italy. Design: Prospective case series. Methods: Cataract patients free from other ocular disease had bilateral implantation of the EDOF Mini Well IOL or the monofocal Mini IOL. Four to 6 weeks after second-eye surgery, the refraction, visual acuity, defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and photic symptoms were assessed. Wavefront analysis was performed. The primary endpoint of was the amplitude of the dioptric interval for 0.1 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity. The secondary endpoint was an aberration comparison between the two IOLs. Results: The study comprised two groups of 25 patients each. The corrected distance visual acuity was better with the monofocal IOL by 0.02 logMAR (P = .03). The 0.1 logMAR dioptric interval was 2.0 diopters (D) for the EDOF IOL and 1.0 D for the monofocal IOL (P < .001). The mean CDVA at -2.0 defocus was 0.15 logMAR ± 0.08 (SD) and 0.52 ± 0.14 logMAR, respectively (P < .001). There was no difference in contrast sensitivity or photic symptoms. The optical aberrations at 4.0 mm and 6.0 mm aperture diameters were similar in the two groups. Conclusion: The EDOF IOL based on spherical aberration provided greater depth of focus than the aspheric monofocal IOL without increasing optical aberrations and with few photic symptoms.
Visual and clinical outcomes after bilateral implantation of a novel extended depth of focus lens post cataract surgery

Muskaan Bansal,Anchal Thakur,Mohammed Jeshan,Kulbhushan Sachdeva,Chintan Malhotra,Amit Gupta,Arun Jain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/IJO.IJO_416_24

2024-09-01

Abstract:Purpose: To assess the visual and clinical outcomes after bilateral implantation of the novel extended depth of focus (EDOF) (AcrySof IQ Vivity) intraocular lens (IOL) using a micromonovision strategy. Methods: This was a prospective interventional study at a tertiary care center. Twenty patients (40 eyes) underwent bilateral implantation of AcrySof IQ Vivity IOL. Twelve weeks postoperatively, both uncorrected vision and corrected vision were assessed. Uniocular and binocular defocus curves with and without correction were noted subjectively as well as objectively on I-trace. Contrast sensitivity was assessed with a FACT (Functional Acuity Contrast Testing) machine, and objective parameters like modulation transfer function and Strehl ratio were also measured on I-Trace. Subjective quality of vision using a subjective questionnaire was also evaluated. Results: The mean binocular postoperative uncorrected distance visual acuity in LogMAR was -0.03 ± 0.09, the uncorrected intermediate visual acuity was 0.03 ± 0.09, and the uncorrected near visual acuity was 0.28 ± 0.18. All defocus curves were smooth and broad with the uncorrected defocus curve (with the micromonovision strategy) better than the corrected defocus curve. The subjective depth of focus (DOF = 3.73) was more than objective DOF (1.93) (P < 0.05). Photopic contrast was better than mesopic at all frequencies. All aberrations increased at 5 mm pupil size compared to 3 mm pupil size and were statistically significant, except for the total eye spherical aberration, which shows no significant difference at 3 mm and 5 mm pupil size (P = 0.27). Spectacle independence for distance, intermediate, and near was achieved in 100%, 94.7%, and 94.7% cases in this study, respectively. Conclusions: Using the micromonovision strategy, the visual performance of this novel EDOF IOL was outstanding both subjectively and objectively.
Clinical Outcomes of Enhanced Monofocal (Mono-EDOF) Intraocular Lenses with the Mini-Monovision Technique versus Trifocal Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Study

İzzet Can,Hasan Ali Bayhan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.4274/tjo.galenos.2024.27805

2024-08-28

Abstract:Objectives: It was aimed to compare the clinical results of the mini-monovision technique (MMV) with enhanced monofocal intraocular lens (IOL) and trifocal IOL applications and to evaluate the intereye differences in the MMV group. Materials and methods: This retrospective observational study evaluated the results of cataract surgeries performed on 48 eyes of 24 patients. Surgeries in Group I were performed for MMV using the RayOne EMV IOL targeting emmetropia in dominant eyes (Group IA) and -0.70 diopter (D) myopia in non-dominant eyes (Group IB), while those in Group II were performed with the AcrySof® IQ PanOptixTM TNFT00 IOL targeting emmetropia. After the surgeries, uncorrected and corrected distance, intermediate, and near distance visual acuities, contrast sensitivity measurements, and defocus curves were determined. Subjective evaluation was made with the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire (NEI VFQ-25). The groups were compared statistically. Results: Postoperative refraction mean spherical equivalent was -0.25±0.22 D, -0.67±0.33 D, and -0.16±0.31 D in the three groups, respectively. A statistical difference was identified in favor of Group IA for uncorrected distance vision and in favor of Group IB for near vision (p<0.05). There was no difference in bilateral uncorrected visions in Groups I and II (p>0.05). While contrast sensitivity was better in Group I at all spatial frequencies (p<0.05), better vision was achieved in the defocus curve at distance in Group IA and at near in Group IB. In the binocular evaluation, it was seen that Groups I and II had similar results. In the subjective evaluation, NEI-VFQ-25 scores were 94.1±4.2/100 in Group I and 91.5±3.0/100 in Group II at 6 months (p>0.05). Photic complaints were significantly more common in Group II. Conclusion: With the MMV technique, it was observed that enhanced monofocal lenses provided better visual acuity at all distances and less dysphotopsia than trifocal lenses, whereas trifocal lenses were better at providing independence from glasses.
Demonstration of direct involvement of cytokines in graft-versus-host reactions using an in vitro human skin explant model.

Anne M. Dickinson,L. Sviland,J. Dunn,P. Carey,S. Proctor

1991-03-01

Bone Marrow Transplantation

Abstract:A human skin explant model was used to investigate the role of cytokines in graft-versus-host reactions (GVHR). Responder cells from HLA mismatched mixed lymphocyte cultures (MLC) produced GVHR (Grades I-III) in skin explant assays. Cell-free supernatants from these experiments also induced similar histopathological changes in the skin. The greatest degree of correlation between the GVHR observed with responder cells and the supernatant was shown with CD4 enriched MLC (p less than 0.001). Supernatants were assayed for tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF alpha) and interferon-gamma (IFN gamma) and CD4 enriched MLC populations produced high levels of these cytokines. These results correlated with the grade of GVHR observed in skin explant assays. The GVHR produced by the supernatant alone could be inhibited by both anti-IFN gamma and anti-TNF alpha polyclonal antibodies. The results suggest that TNF alpha and IFN gamma are directly involved in tissue damage during graft-versus-host disease in allogeneic transplant in man.
Visual Function after Implantation of Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Hiroko Bissen-Miyajima,Yuka Ota,Yoko Taira,Ryo Takemura,Keiichiro Minami

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00801-1

Abstract:Introduction: The aim of this prospective study was to compare the visual functions of extended depth-of-focus intraocular lenses (EDOF IOLs) and monofocal IOLs in eyes with mild to moderate primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). Methods: Cataractous eyes with POAG controlled using medical treatments, no central visual field defects, and mean deviation (MD) values of -10 dB or better on the 30-2 test grid of the Swedish Interactive Threshold Algorithm standard program were included. Twenty-two eyes of 22 patients received EDOF IOLs (ZXR00V and ZXV150-375; J&J), whereas 24 eyes of 24 patients received monofocal IOLs (ZCB00V and ZCV150-375; J&J). MD values, corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), and photopic contrast sensitivity were measured at 3 months after surgery. Noninferiority of CDVA and contrast sensitivity in eyes with EDOF IOLs to eyes with monofocal IOLs were examined. Results: The postoperative mean MDs of eyes with EDOF and monofocal IOLs were -2.76 dB and -4.21 dB with no significant difference. The CDVA of eyes with EDOF IOLs was noninferior to that of eyes with monofocal IOLs (P = 0.02). There were no inferiority in contrast sensitivity at any spatial frequency (P < 0.001). Conclusions: The visual function of EDOF IOLs in eyes with mild-to-moderate POAG was not inferior to that of monofocal IOLs. Trial registration: Registered in the Japan Registry for Clinical Research (identifier: jRCTs032200218).
Fellow-Eye Comparison Of Monocular Visual Outcomes Following Monofocal EDOF And Trifocal EDOF IOL Implantation

Victor Danzinger,Daniel Schartmüller,Marcus Lisy,Markus Schranz,Luca Schwarzenbacher,Claudette Abela-Formanek,Rupert Menapace,Christina Leydolt

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajo.2024.05.029

IF: 5.488

2024-06-07

American Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:Purpose To compare intraindividual monocular visual performance of a monofocal EDOF and a trifocal EDOF IOL following bilateral cataract surgery. Design Single-center, prospective, fellow-eye comparison clinical trial. Methods All patients received uneventful bilateral cataract surgery with implantation of the monofocal EDOF Isopure IOL in the dominant eye and the trifocal EDOF FineVision Triumf IOL in the non-dominant eye. Intraindividual monocular comparison included visual acuity at various distances, defocus curves, internal total higher-order aberration (HOA), spherical aberration (SA) Z(4.0), IOL decentration and tilt. Additionally, subjective outcomes were evaluated using Halo and Glare simulation and the VF-7 questionnaire. Results In total, 25 patients (50 eyes) were included. Intraindividual monocular BCDVA, DCIVA, and BCNVA were comparable (p> .05). However, monocular contrast acuity (p= .019), DCNVA (p< .001) and defocus curves at defocus levels of 0.0D (p= .005) and between -1.5 and -4.0D (p< .001) differed significantly. At 5mm, internal HOA and SA Z(4.0) were significantly different (p .05). Conclusion In this combined fellow-eye comparison, near vision was significantly better with the trifocal EDOF IOL. The monofocal EDOF IOL demonstrated similar distance and intermediate visual performance as the trifocal EDOF IOL. Overall, low values of photic phenomena and visual impairment was observed.

ophthalmology
NIH sets up national stem-cell bank in Wisconsin.

J. Brainard

2005-10-14

Abstract:
Visual outcome and optical quality after implantation of zonal refractive multifocal and extended-range-of-vision IOLs: a prospective comparison

Xiaohui Song,Xin Liu,Wei Wang,Yanan Zhu,Zhenwei Qin,Danni Lyu,Xingchao Shentu,Wen Xv,Peiqing Chen,Yao Ke

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000000088

2020-01-01

Abstract:Purpose: To compare the visual outcomes and optical quality of 2 presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses (IOLs) with those of a monofocal IOL. Settings: Eye Center, the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University, School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. Design: Prospective cohort study. Methods: The study included patients who had cataract surgery and were implanted with a Tecnis Symfony Extended Range of Vision (EROV) IOL (ZXR00), a zonal refractive multifocal IOL (Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15), or a monofocal IOL (Lentis L-313). Postoperative examinations took place at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months and included visual acuity at far, intermediate, and near distances, defocus curves, contrast sensitivity, wavefront aberrations, and modulation transfer function (MTF). Patients completed the Visual Function Index questionnaire (VF-14), the Quality of Vision questionnaire (QoV), and a visual quality self-evaluation. Results: One hundred thirteen patients were enrolled. The EROV and multifocal IOLs achieved a significantly better range of intermediate vergences (P < .05), better distance-corrected intermediate visual acuity (P <= .001), higher VF-14 (P < .05) and visual quality self-evaluation scores (P < .05) than the monofocal IOL, but there were no significant differences between the 2 presbyopia-correcting IOLs. The EROV provided lower total wavefront aberrations and better MTF than the multifocal and the monofocal IOLs (P < .05) but demonstrated a worse QoV score (P < .05), especially for severity of halo (P < .01) and starburst (P < .05) symptoms. Conclusions: Both the Tecnis Symfony ZXR00 and the Lentis Comfort LS-313 MF15 offered excellent visual restoration and stable distance and intermediate visual acuity, good subjective visual function, and good contrast sensitivity. The EROV IOL provided better objective optical quality and more prominent dysphotopsia symptoms than the multifocal IOL. Copyright (C) 2020 Published by Wolters Kluwer on behalf of ASCRS and ESCRS
A simple device for driving the Grass oscilloscope recording camera by electrical signals

J. Cerf,J. V. Dale,É. Cerf,F. Symons

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02478198

Medical & Biological Engineering

Abstract:
Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens

Giacomo Savini,Nicole Balducci,Claudio Carbonara,Scipione Rossi,Manuel Altieri,Nicola Frugis,Emilia Zappulla,Roberto Bellucci,Giovanni Alessio

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41433-018-0221-1

Abstract:Background/objective: This study aimed to investigate the visual performance of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens (EDOF-IOL). Subjects/methods: In this multicenter, prospective, observational study, we enrolled 97 patients who underwent cataract surgery or refractive lens exchange with implantation of the Mini Well EDOF-IOL (SIFI, Italy). Patients underwent postoperatively the following examinations between 4 and 8 weeks after surgery: corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), reading speed with Radner's chart, distance-corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, and haloes quantitative assessment. Results: In the whole sample, the mean monocular CDVA and DCNVA were, respectively, 0.02 ± 0.07 logMAR and 0.38 ± 0.15 logRAD (logarithm of the reading acuity determination). In the 67 bilaterally implanted patients, binocular CDVA and DCNVA were better (0.00 ± 0.05 logMAR and 0.26 ± 0.13 logRAD) than the corresponding monocular values (p = 0.02 and p = 0.0002, respectively). Ninety-two percent of patients bilaterally implanted reached a binocular reading speed >80 words per minute at a 0.5 logRAD print size (corresponding to the common book print size). The defocus curves showed that the EDOF-IOL provided increased depth of focus through 2.0 D of defocus, with the best performance at 1.0 and 1.5 D. Contrast sensitivity was within normal limits at all spatial frequencies. The mean visual disturbance index was 0.08 ± 0.12, suggesting low night visual disturbances. Conclusions: The new EDOF-IOL provided good visual acuity for distance, intermediate, and near vision, with no loss of contrast sensitivity and low risk of night visual disturbances.
Visual Performance of Eyes with Residual Refractive Errors after Implantation of an Extended Vision Intraocular Lens

Laureano A. Rementería-Capelo,Inés Contreras,Aida Morán,Pilar Lorente-Hevia,Laura Mariñas,Javier Ruiz-Alcocer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1155/2023/7701390

2023-05-05

Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:Background. To analyze the tolerance on distance vision of different combined residual astigmatic situations in patients implanted with a novel wavefront shaping extended depth of focus (EDoF) intraocular lens (IOL). Methods. The study included patients implanted with the Acrysof® IQ Vivity® IOL. Uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) were measured three months after surgery, considering CDVA as the reference situation of the study. Distance VA was also measured in different refractive situations: (A) with 0.50 diopters (D) of positive (myopization) and negative (hyperopization) defocus and (B) with a residual mixed astigmatic refraction induced by adding a combination of −0.25 D spherical and 0.50 D cylindrical lenses placed in vertical (against the rule-ATR), oblique, and horizontal (with the rule-WTR) positions. Results. The study included 30 eyes of 30 patients. UDVA and CDVA were −0.04 ± 0.05 and −0.05 ± 0.05 logMAR, respectively. VA values with +0.50 D and −0.50 D of defocus were 0.01 ± 0.06 and 0.00 ± 0.04 logMAR, respectively. VA was better with distance correction ( p < 0.001 ) and no differences were found between the myopic and the hyperopic situations ( p = 0.09 ). Distance VA for the ATR, oblique, and WTR astigmatic situations was 0.01 ± 0.05, 0.01 ± 0.06, and 0.01 ± 0.04 logMAR, respectively. VA was better for the reference situation ( p < 0.001 ) and no differences were found among the three astigmatic situations ( p = 0.21 ). Conclusions. Low residual defocus and mixed astigmatic errors, regardless of its orientation, seem to be tolerated by patients implanted with the studied EDoF IOL. This trial is registered with NCT05392998. Registered 26 May 2022-Retrospectively registered.

ophthalmology
Prospective Evaluation of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Contralateral Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) and Hybrid EDOF-Multifocal IOL

George O Waring 4th,Arthur B van den Berg,Roberta M van den Berg,Karolinne M Rocha

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3928/1081597X-20240805-02

Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate clinical outcomes following contralateral implantation of a diffractive extended depth of focus (EDOF) and a hybrid EDOF-multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) with a violet filter in a U.S.-based population. Methods: In this prospective, non-comparative study, 60 eyes of 30 patients aged 40 years and older underwent bilateral cataract surgery and implantation of a DXR00V IOL (Tecnis Symfony OptiBlue) in the dominant eye and a DFR00V (Tecnis Synergy) IOL in the non-dominant eye. Outcome measures included uncorrected (UDVA) and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuity, distance-corrected intermediate (DCIVA, 66 cm), near and very near visual acuity (DCNVA, 40 and 33 cm), and patient-reported outcomes. Results: At 6 months postoperatively, binocular mean UDVA and CDVA were -0.10 ± 0.07 and -0.11 ± 0.05 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR), respectively. The mean DCIVA was 0.26 ± 0.08 logMAR in the DXR00V eyes and 0.23 ± 0.06 logMAR in the DFR00V eyes. The mean DCNVA at 40 and 33 cm were 0.28 ± 0.12 and 0.30 ± 0.15 logMAR, respectively, in the DXR00V eyes and 0.07 ± 0.08 and 0.07 ± 0.10 logMAR, respectively, in the DFR00V eyes. The mean binocular DCIVA and DCNVA at 33 and 40 cm were 0.18 ± 0.05, 0.06 ± 0.08, and 0.06 ± 0.07 logMAR, respectively. The percentages of patients achieving spectacle independence at far, intermediate, and near distances were 100%, 100%, and 81%, respectively. Conclusions: Contralateral implantation of the diffractive EDOF and a hybrid EDOF-multifocal IOL yielded excellent binocular visual acuity at all distances, as well as high patient satisfaction and functional performance on visual tasks. [J Refract Surg. 2024;40(10):e699-e705.].
The small intestinal disaccharidase activity in ulcerative colitis.

E. Gudmand-Höyer,V. Binder,J. Söltoft

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.1975.12096951

Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology

Abstract:In 12 patients suffering from ulcerative colitis the small-intestinal disaccharidase activity has been determined during an acute exacerbation of the disease as well as after remission. The lactase activity was significantly lower during the acute stage. No case of transitoric lactose malabsorption was found.
Clinical performance after implantation of the Symfony extended depth of focus intraocular lens in the dominant eye and the Synergy presbyopia correcting intraocular lens in the non-dominant eye

William L Soscia,Joaquin O DeRojas,Priya M Mathews,Amy Brutsky,Kerry D Solomon,Richard Potvin,Helga P Sandoval,William L. Soscia,Priya M. Mathews,Kerry D. Solomon,Helga P. Sandoval

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001412

2024-02-01

Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate subjective and objective outcomes after combined implantation of an extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) and a combined technology multifocal lens (CT-IOL). Setting: Two clinical practices in the USA Design: Prospective, unmasked, multi-center, non-randomized bilateral eye study Methods: Patients interested in reducing their dependence on spectacles were implanted with an EDOF IOL in the dominant eye and a CT-IOL in the non-dominant eye. Refractive and visual acuity data at various distances (4 m, 66 cm, 40 cm, 33 cm) were collected 3 months post-surgery, along with the distance-corrected binocular defocus curve and responses to questionnaires related to spectacle independence, visual disturbances, and overall visual function. Results: Data from 37 subjects were analyzed. The distance corrected binocular defocus curve showed a mean VA better than 0.1 logMAR (20/25) at all vergences from +1.00 D to -2.50 D. Thirty-six subjects (97%) had an uncorrected binocular VA of 0.3 logMAR or better, at all test distances. Seventy percent of subjects (26/37) reported never wearing glasses at any distance and 84% (31/37) were “completely” or “mostly” satisfied with their overall vision after surgery. Halos were the disturbance reported most frequently, and reported as most bothersome, with difficulty driving at night the most common visual function issue. Difficulty reading was the next most reported issue. Overall eyesight was rated as “excellent” or “good” by 92% (34/37) of subjects. Conclusions: This combined EDOF/CT-IOL approach was well tolerated by subjects and provided some potential benefits relative to bilateral implantation of either lens.

ophthalmology,surgery
Clinical outcomes and optical performance of a new segmental refractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens

David Rua Amaro,Eckart Bertelmann,Christoph von Sonnleithner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12886-024-03586-4

2024-08-01

Abstract:Background: The visual performance and the optical quality of a segmental refractive extended depth-of-focus (EDoF) intraocular lens (IOL) were evaluated in a prospective, single-arm, single-center study. Methods: A total of 20 patients (40 eyes) after bilateral implantation of the refractive segmental EDoF Acunex Vario AN6V were included. Assessment procedure: refraction outcome, monocular and binocular uncorrected (UCVA) and distance-corrected visual acuity (DCVA), defocus curve, contrast sensitivity (CS), higher-order aberrations (HOAs) and patient satisfaction were evaluated 1 and 3 months after surgery. Results: At 3-month follow-up, mean spherical equivalent was - 0.23 ± 0.32 D. Binocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (VA) at distance, intermediate and near was - 0.08 ± 0.06 logMAR at 4 m, -0.03 ± 0.06 logMAR at 66 cm and 0.16 ± 0.06 logMAR at 40 cm, respectively. The binocular defocus curve showed a VA better than 0.20 logMAR over a range from + 1.50 to - 2.45 D. Contrast sensitivity aligned with monofocal lenses, highlighting the lens's clinical value. Aberrometry showed minimal changes in corneal aberrations. NEI-RQL-42-Questionnaire showed a high patient satisfaction for daily activities and revealed reduced dependence on glasses, particularly for near and intermediate vision. The Acunex Vario AN6V demonstrated minimal dysphotopsias, making it a promising option for those seeking spectacle independence. Conclusion: This segmental refractive EDoF IOL provides a high degree of spectacle independence for far and intermediate distances with functional near VA. Although inducing residual coma aberrations, it showed subjectively good results with little dysphotopsias. Trial registration: This study protocol was reviewed and approved by ethics committee of Charité University, Berlin, Germany, with approval number EA4/126/20.
Visual outcomes following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended depth of focus toric intraocular lens using a mini-monovision approach

Mun Wai Lee

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-024-03247-x

2024-07-24

Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate the clinical outcomes following bilateral implantation of the AcrySof™ IQ Vivity™ toric extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL). Design: Prospective interventional case series. Methods: Patients with bilateral significant cataracts and pre-existing corneal astigmatism underwent cataract surgery and implantation with the AcrySof™ IQ Vivity™ toric IOL. Dominant eyes were targeted at emmetropia and non-dominant eyes at -0.50D. Primary endpoints were binocular uncorrected distance (UDVA), intermediate (UIVA at 66 cm) and near (UNVA at 40 cm) acuities at 3 months. Secondary outcomes were corrected distance (CDVA), distance corrected intermediate (DCIVA) and distance corrected near (DCNVA), refractive predictability, rotational stability, binocular defocus curve, contrast sensitivity, Questionnaire for Visual Disturbances (QUVID) and Visual Function Index (VF-14) questionnaire scores. All visual acuities were converted to logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) for analysis. Results: 30 patients underwent uneventful phacoemulsification. The mean binocular UDVA, UIVA and UNVA were 0.06 ± 0.12, 0.11 ± 0.10 and 0.26 ± 0.10 respectively. The mean refractive spherical equivalent (MRSE) for dominant and non-dominant eyes were - 0.07D ± 0.27 and - 0.12D ± 0.54 respectively. 92.4% of dominant eyes and 84.6% of non-dominant eyes within 0.50D of target. The mean IOL rotation was 3.85° ± 5.09 with 86.7% of eyes with less than 5° of rotation. 26.7%, 20% and 36.7% of patients reported starbursts, haloes and glare respectively. The mean VF-14 score was 91.77. Conclusion: Bilateral implantation of the AcrySof™ IQ Vivity™ Toric IOL resulted in very good unaided visual acuities for far and intermediate distance with functional near vision. Dysphotopsias were reported but despite this, a high level of visual function was achieved.
A Comparative Evaluation of Diffractive Trifocal and New Refractive/Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses for Refractive Lens Exchange

Kemal Ozulken,Hasan Kiziltoprak,Erdem Yuksel,Tarkan Mumcuoğlu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02713683.2020.1833347

Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate and compare the visual performance and quality of life (QOL) associated with refractive/extended depth of focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) and diffractive trifocal IOLs in refractive lens exchange patients. Materials and methods: This was a comparative interventional study of patients undergoing implantation of Lucidis (Swiss Advanced Vision, SAV‑IOL SA, Neuchâtel, Switzerland) or AT LISA tri 839MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Germany) IOLs. Near, intermediate, and distance best corrected and uncorrected visual acuities were collected at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. The vision-related QOL was evaluated 1 and 3 months after surgery, using the National Eye Institute Visual Function Questionnaire-14 (VF-14 QOL questionnaire). Results: A total of 74 patients underwent refractive lens exchange and IOL implantation, with 38 patients in the EDOF group and 36 in the trifocal group. Among all visual acuities, uncorrected near visual acuity was statistically significantly better with the Lucidis IOL at the first month (p = .02) and diminished at the third-month visit (p = .16). When we compared the VF-14 QOL questionnaire scores, reading small print, reading a newspaper or book, and driving at night were statistically significantly better in the Lucidis group at the first month (p = .00, for each). That difference persisted only in driving at night at the third-month visit (p = .04). Reading small print, driving at night, and doing fine handwork were the most difficult tasks in the AT LISA group at the first month, and only driving at night remained so at the third-month visit. Conclusions: The refractive results and visual outcomes at all distances of EDOF and trifocal IOLs were highly satisfactory. However, the EDOF design in the Lucidis IOL achieves lower rates of glare in the early period after refractive lens exchange.

Adipocytes as a critical component of the tumor microenvironment.

Clinical Outcomes after Bilateral Implantation of a Wavefront-Shaping Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) IOL with Mini-Monovision

Clinical Outcomes of a New Non-Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lens Targeted for Mini-Monovision

Real-world evaluation of visual results and patient satisfaction for extended range of focus intraocular lenses compared to trifocal lenses

Clinical and aberrometric evaluation of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens based on spherical aberration

Visual and clinical outcomes after bilateral implantation of a novel extended depth of focus lens post cataract surgery

Clinical Outcomes of Enhanced Monofocal (Mono-EDOF) Intraocular Lenses with the Mini-Monovision Technique versus Trifocal Intraocular Lenses: A Comparative Study

Demonstration of direct involvement of cytokines in graft-versus-host reactions using an in vitro human skin explant model.

Visual Function after Implantation of Diffractive Extended Depth-of-Focus Intraocular Lenses in Eyes with Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma

Fellow-Eye Comparison Of Monocular Visual Outcomes Following Monofocal EDOF And Trifocal EDOF IOL Implantation

NIH sets up national stem-cell bank in Wisconsin.

Visual outcome and optical quality after implantation of zonal refractive multifocal and extended-range-of-vision IOLs: a prospective comparison

A simple device for driving the Grass oscilloscope recording camera by electrical signals

Functional assessment of a new extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens

Visual Performance of Eyes with Residual Refractive Errors after Implantation of an Extended Vision Intraocular Lens

Prospective Evaluation of Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Contralateral Implantation of an Extended Depth of Focus (EDOF) and Hybrid EDOF-Multifocal IOL

The small intestinal disaccharidase activity in ulcerative colitis.

Clinical performance after implantation of the Symfony extended depth of focus intraocular lens in the dominant eye and the Synergy presbyopia correcting intraocular lens in the non-dominant eye

Clinical outcomes and optical performance of a new segmental refractive extended depth-of-focus intraocular lens

Visual outcomes following bilateral implantation of a non-diffractive extended depth of focus toric intraocular lens using a mini-monovision approach

A Comparative Evaluation of Diffractive Trifocal and New Refractive/Extended Depth of Focus Intraocular Lenses for Refractive Lens Exchange