The use of mantrailing dogs in police and judicial context, future directions, limits and possibilities - A law review

Leif Woidtke,Frank Crispino,Barbara Ferry,Udo Gansloßer,Nina Marie Hohlfeld,Tom Osterkamp
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2023.100439
2023-10-04
Abstract:The extraordinary capabilities of the canine nose are increasingly being used by law enforcement agencies in many countries to solve and reconstruct crimes. As a result, this type of forensic evidence can be and is still being challenged in the courts. So far, only a few publications have addressed the jurisprudence concerning mantrailing. We provide an overview of the jurisprudence in Germany and the USA, as well as insights from France. Relevant databases were searched, and 201 verdicts from Germany and 801 verdicts from the USA were analyzed. As a result, 16 published verdicts on the topic of mantrailing were found for Germany, and 44 verdicts since 2010 were found for the USA. The use of mantrailers and human scent discrimination dogs is employed in the investigative process in all three countries. The results derived from these methods are admissible as evidence in court, albeit not as sole evidence.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?