The Role of Arginine 310 in Catalysis and Substrate Specificity in Xanthine Dehydrogenase from Rhodobacter capsulatus*

J. Pauff,C. Hemann,Nora Jünemann,S. Leimkühler,R. Hille
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M700364200
IF: 5.485
2007-04-27
Journal of Biological Chemistry
Abstract:The rapid reaction kinetics of wild-type xanthine dehydrogenase from Rhodobacter capsulatus and variants at Arg-310 in the active site have been characterized for a variety of purine substrates. With xanthine as substrate, kred (the limiting rate of enzyme reduction by substrate at high [S]) decreased ∼20-fold in an R310K variant and 2 × 104-fold in an R310M variant. Although Arg-310 lies on the opposite end of the substrate from the C-8 position that becomes hydroxylated, its interaction with substrate still contributed ∼4.5 kcal/mol toward transition state stabilization. The other purines examined fell into two distinct groups: members of the first were effectively hydroxylated by the wild-type enzyme but were strongly affected by the exchange of Arg-310 to methionine (with a reduction in kred greater than 103), whereas members of the second were much less effectively hydroxylated by wild-type enzyme but also much less significantly affected by the amino acid exchanges (with a reduction in kred less than 50-fold). The effect was such that the 4000-fold range in kred seen with wild-type enzyme was reduced to a mere 4-fold in the R310M variant. The data are consistent with a model in which “good” substrates are bound “correctly” in the active site in an orientation that allows Arg-310 to stabilize the transition state for the first step of the overall reaction via an electrostatic interaction at the C-6 position, thereby accelerating the reaction rate. On the other hand, “poor” substrates bound upside down relative to this “correct” orientation. In so doing, they are unable to avail themselves of the additional catalytic power provided by Arg-310 in wild-type enzyme but, for this reason, are significantly less affected by mutations at this position. The kinetic data thus provide a picture of the specific manner in which the physiological substrate xanthine is oriented in the active site relative to Arg-310 and how this residue is used catalytically to accelerate the reaction rate (rather than simply bind substrate) despite being remote from the position that is hydroxylated.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?