Abstract:Whereas medical practice stems from Hippocrates, cardiovascular science originates with Aristotle. The Hippocratic philosophy was championed by Galen (129-216 CE), whose advocacy of a tripartite soul found favor in the early Christian Church. In contrast, Aristotle's works were banned as heresy by ecclesiastical authority, only to survive and prosper in the Islamic Golden Age (775-1258 CE). Galen theorized that the circulation consisted of separate venous and arterial systems. Blood was produced in the liver and traveled centrifugally through veins. When arriving in the right ventricle, venous blood passed through tiny pores in the ventricular septum into the left ventricle, where it became aerated by air passing from the lungs through the pulmonary veins to the left side of the heart. Following arrival at distal sites, arterial blood disappeared, being consumed by the tissues, requiring that the liver needed to continually synthesize new blood. The heart was viewed as a sucking organ, and the peripheral pulse was deemed to result from changes in arterial tone, rather than cardiac systole. Galen's framework remained undisputed and dominated medical thought for 1,300 years, but the reintroduction of Aristotelian principles from the Islamic world into Europe (through the efforts of the Toledo School of Translators) were nurtured by the academic freedom and iconoclastic environment uniquely cultivated at the University of Padua, made possible by Venetian rebellion against papal authority. At Padua, the work of Andreas Vesalius, Realdo Colombo, Hieronymus Fabricius ab Acquapendente, and William Harvey (1543-1628) methodically destroyed Galen's model, leading to the modern concept of a closed-ended circulation. Yet, due to political forces, Harvey was ridiculed, as was James Lind, who performed the first prospective controlled trial, involving citrus fruits for scurvy (1747); it took nearly 50 years for his work to be accepted. Even the work of William Withering (1785), the father of cardiovascular pharmacology, was tarnished by professional jealously and the marketing campaign of a pharmaceutical company. Today's cardiovascular investigators should understand that major advances are routinely derided by the medical establishment for political or personal reasons; and it may take decades or centuries for important work to be accepted.

Lessons from the life of William Harvey

Harvey's Heart: The Discovery of Blood Circulation

Lessons for Cardiovascular Clinical Investigators: The Tumultuous 2,500-Year Journey of Physicians Who Ignited Our Fire

Renaissance-Europe-17th Century

Thomas Willis, a pioneer in translational research in anatomy (on the 350th anniversary of Cerebri anatome)

Art and anatomy in the renaissance: are the lessons still relevant today

Historical continuity in the methodology of modern medical science: Leonardo leads the way

Leonardo da Vinci and Fluid Mechanics

To Sir, With Love

Sir Roy Calne—A Tribute to the Legendary Transplant Surgeon

[Andreas Vesalius: his rich imagination and colorful detail account in his book: 'Research of the anatomical observations of Gabriel Falloppius']

Perspectives on the History of Coronary Physiology: Discovery of Major Principles and Their Clinical Correlates

Blood, perceptions, resource and ownership: When transfusion illustrates the complexity

Learning medicine by the book: reading and writing surgical manuals in early modern London

The Legacy of Sir Ronald Ross: From Malaria Research to Multifaceted Achievements

Life Blood by David Marks: a review

Truncated ambition: Thomas King Chambers, MD (1817–1889)

Samuel Holden Parsons Lee (1772-1863): American physician, entrepreneur and selfless fighter of the 1798 Yellow Fever epidemic of New London, Connecticut

George Howard Darwin and the "public" interpretation of The Tides

The History of Vascular Neurosurgery: A Journey of Evolution and Revolution

Treatise on Hydraulics