Abstract:Abstract Introduction Radical prostatectomy remains one of the gold standard treatments for localized prostate cancer, the most prevalent solid organ cancer in men. Surgical management of prostate cancer has been theorized to increase the risk of developing Peyronie’s Disease (PD). In 2010, Drs. Tal and Mulhall’s team characterized the incidence of PD in a cohort of 1011 men after radical prostatectomy to be 13.7% at 2 years and 15.9% at 3 years of follow-up. These numbers, significantly higher than estimates in the general population, which range from 0.5 to 7.1% (Sharma et al., Sex Med Rev 2020;8:314–23), suggest radical prostatectomy is a risk factor for developing PD. Objective Our aim was to evaluate the incidence of PD among post-prostatectomy patients who undergo a formal multi-modal penile rehabilitation program that includes mechanical and pharmacologic interventions to promote penile smooth muscle activation after surgery. Methods In this retrospective, descriptive study we reviewed the charts of 581 patients who were diagnosed with prostate cancer, treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP), and were engaged in a penile rehabilitation program from January 2016 through January 2019. At our institution, patients scheduled for prostatectomy are referred preoperatively to an academic Men’s Health clinic to start a multi-modal program and follow up regularly for evaluation of sexual health. The program includes daily tadalafil, L-citrulline, and VED use (Table 1). Patients refractory to these therapies had the option to increase tadalafil dosing or undergo further treatment with intracavernosal injections at ~3 months post-op. We excluded patients who had PD pre-operatively or who did not have post-operative follow-up with the providers at this institution. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of PD among this cohort. Secondary outcome included time to development or diagnosis of PD. Results 581 patients with prostate cancer treated with RALP engaged in penile rehabilitation and were included in this analysis. The median age of men was 62.6 y with additional demographics listed in Table 2. The incidence of PD in this cohort was 2.9% (17 patients) with a median follow-up of 21.4 mo (IQR 2.8 – 55.8 mo). The diagnosis of PD was made at a median of 28.7 mo (IQR 20 – 36 mo) after prostatectomy. The 17 patients with PD had a median follow-up of 38.9 mo (IQR 23.2 – 55.8 mo). Conclusions In this cohort of prostate cancer patients treated with RALP and undergoing a consistent, multi-modal penile rehabilitation program, the incidence of PD was 2.9%, and median time to diagnosis was 28.7 months. This is the first study to assess PD incidence in men who engage in mechanical and pharmacologic penile rehabilitation at time of RALP. Furthermore, diagnosis of PD was made more than two years after surgery; this warrants further evaluation on whether penile rehabilitation prevents PD. This retrospective analysis is a hypothesis-generating study that should inspire further research on the role of regular mechanical stimulation or daily PDE-5 inhibitors in delaying or preventing PD after pelvic surgery. Disclosure Any of the authors act as a consultant, employee or shareholder of an industry for: Endo Scientific.

[Erectile disfunction after treatment for prostate cancer]

Predicting erectile dysfunction after treatment for localized prostate cancer

Amnesia for Object Attributes

Cavernous Nerve Injury Resulted Erectile Dysfunction and Regeneration

Surgical and non-surgical predictors of long term erectile function after robot assisted radical prostatectomy

Sexual Rehabilitation After Treatment for Prostate Cancer-Part 1: Recommendations From the Fourth International Consultation for Sexual Medicine (ICSM 2015)

(153) Penile Rehabilitation After Nerve-Sparing Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Preliminary Data Of A Prospective Feasibility Study

Efficacy of a preprostatectomy multi-modal penile rehabilitation regimen on recovery of postoperative erectile function

(421) Systematic Review Of Prostatic And Pelvic Imaging Parameters To Predict Post Radical Prostatectomy Erectile Dysfunction

Restoring Quality of Life: A Comprehensive Review of Penile Rehabilitation Techniques Following Prostate Surgery

Screening of Associated Factors for Erectile Dysfunction after Radical Prostatectomy and Construction of a Clinical Risk Assessment Model: A Retrospective Study

(333) Sexual Function Recovery Following Open And Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Results Of An Academic Penile Rehabilitation Program

(014) Expectations of Patients and Their Partners After Penile Rehabilitation Programs After Nerve-Sparing Prostatectomy: Are There Relevant Differences?

An update on the current status and future prospects of erectile dysfunction following radical prostatectomy

(015) The Association Between Prostate Volume and Erectile Function Recovery Following Radical Prostatectomy

The role of lipidic balance on erectile dysfunction in prostate cancer patients undergoing robotic surgery

(012) Incidence of Peyronie’s Disease After Radical Prostatectomy Among Patients Undergoing Penile Rehabilitation Regimen

[Attitudes of Prostate Cancer Patients Towards Postoperative Penile Rehabilitation and Their Influencing Factors].

Patient-reported functional outcome measures and treatment choice for prostate cancer

Life after prostate cancer treatment: a mixed methods study of the experiences of men with sexual dysfunction and their partners

Improving Quality of Life and Psychosocial Health for Penile Cancer Survivors: A Narrative Review