THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PEPTIC ULCER AND CORONARY OCCLUSION°

F. Brooks,D. Sandweiss,J. Long
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00000441-196303000-00003
1963-03-01
Abstract:The increasing clinical and experimental evidence that dietary fat is related to coronary atherosclerosis and myocardial infarction has led to concern over the use of diets high in fat content in the treatment of peptic ulcer. One of us (D.J.S.) having experienced both diseases personally, began an extensive investigation of this subject before his untimely death in August 1962. Peptic ulcer and myocardial infarction are common diseases so that careful statistical studies are necessary to be certain whether or not their occurrence in the same individual is more frequent than would result from chance alone. A number of autopsy and clinical studies have been made in an attempt to answer this question. Table 1 shows the incidence of peptic ulcer (4-18%) and coronary occlusion (3-11%) in series of consecutive autopsies in the U.S.A. and Great Britain. These statistics indicate the importance of differentiating between acute and chronic ulcers and active ulcers and scars. The incidence of these two diseases in the same individual at autopsy is shown in Tables 2 and 3. The number of patients is much less than in the preceding table except for the British study. Seven to seventeen percent of patients with coronary occlusion also had peptic ulcer while 3-365c of patients with peptic ulcer had an associated coronary occlusion. In the latter group an attempt was made to consider the role of a diet high in saturated fats. Analysis of the ulcer diets used by one of us (D.J.S.) 9 has shown that from 49-78% of the total daily calories was derived from fat. Of the total daily calories, from 23-54% was derived from saturated fatty acids. Although the incidence of coronary occlusion was higher in those ulcer patients treated with a "Sippy" diet, lack of information concerning the duration of such treatment or the faithfulness with which patients adhered to such a diet weaken the significance of this difference. Furthermore the composition of the diet in those patients not treated with a "Sippy" diet is not known.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?