No-donors: an emerging class of compounds in medicinal chemistry.

A. Gasco,R. Fruttero,G. Sorba

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/CHIN.199717283

1996-10-01

Il Farmaco

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Kelan Yuan,Haiping Zhu,Yujie Mou,Yaying Wu,Jingliang He,Xiaodan Huang,Xiuming Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cts.12933

2021-01-01

Clinical and Translational Science

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the influence of smartphone reading on the ocular surface and to compare the various effects of different screens and light conditions on the ocular surface. One hundred nineteen volunteers were randomly divided into: light + organic light‐emitting diode (OLED), light + electronic ink (eINK), dark + OLED, and dark + eINK. Ocular surface examinations, including noninvasive break‐up time (NIBUT), noninvasive keratograph tear meniscus height (NIKTMH), ocular redness, fluorescein break‐up time (FBUT), corneal fluorescein staining, meibomian gland assessment, Schirmer I Test, and blinking frequency, were performed before and after a reading task. Symptoms were evaluated using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) and Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS‐Q). NIBUT and FBUT were decreased statistically significantly after participants read on an OLED screen for 2 hours compared with the baseline in light and dark environments, whereas no statistically significant decrease was observed on an eINK screen. NIKTMH was statistically significantly decreased after reading on an OLED screen in light and dark settings, and the eINK screen had a lesser effect on NIKTMH. An obvious increase in the ocular redness, OSDI and CVS‐Q scores was observed after reading on an OLED screen, whereas the eINK screen had a lesser effect on these indicators. Blink rate increased gradually in OLED subgroups during the reading task, whereas no statistically significant difference was observed in the eINK subgroups. Our research suggested that reading on an OLED screen can cause ocular surface disorder and obvious subjective discomfort, whereas reading on an eINK screen can minimize ocular surface disorder in both dark and light environments.
Closing Eyes with Artificial Tears: A Simple and Effective Strategy to Combat Screen-Related Asthenopia and Dry Eye Symptoms

Ning Wang,Jinjin Min,Xiaojing Fan,Xiuming Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aopr.2024.07.001

2024-01-01

Advances in Ophthalmology Practice and Research

Abstract:Background The widespread use of various video display terminals (VDTs) always had a detrimental impact on ocular health. Prolonged use of smartphones has been one of the leading causes of dry eye (DE) and asthenopia. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to find a simple and effective strategy to combat screen-related DE and asthenopia. Methods A group of healthy participants aged 18 and above were randomly assigned to three groups and tasked with a 2-hour smartphone reading task. After 1 hour of usage, each group adopted different methods of rest: no rest (Group A), a 10-minute eye-closed rest (Group B), or a 10-minute eye-closed joint artificial tears rest (Group C). Ophthalmological examinations and questionnaires were administered to all participants before and after the 2-hour reading task. Results 90 qualified volunteers, including 29 males and 61 females, were randomly assigned to three groups. Group A demonstrated a significant increase in the severity of DE and asthenopia as evidenced by all the evaluated indices. On the other hand, Group C did not exhibit any notable change in DE and asthenopia symptoms, with an improvement in corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) results (p > 0.05) when compared to the pre-reading values. Group B showed a significant increase in ocular surface disease index (OSDI) (p ≤ 0.05) and a decrease in critical flicker frequency (CFF) (p ≤ 0.05). Conclusions Close-eye rest with artificial tears may be a convenient and effective prevention strategy for screen-related DE and asthenopia.
High-Intensity Use of Smartphone Can Significantly Increase the Diagnostic Rate and Severity of Dry Eye

Chunyang Wang,Kelan Yuan,Yujie Mou,Yaying Wu,Xin Wang,Renjian Hu,Jinjin Min,Xiaodan Huang,Xiuming Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2022.829271

IF: 3.9

2022-01-01

Frontiers in Medicine

Abstract:Purpose To investigate the effects of high-intensity use of smartphones on ocular surface homeostasis and to explore whether high-intensity use of handheld digital devices can cause false increase of dry eye diagnostic rate. Methods In this prospective self-control study, 60 subjects (120 eyes) were recruited and asked to read on smartphones provided by the same manufacturer for two consecutive hours. This study was conducted during 8:00 – 10:00 AM to eliminate the influence of digital equipment used the previous day. Ophthalmological examinations [non-invasive tear breakup time (NIBUT), fluorescein breakup time (FBUT), Schirmer I test, corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), bulbar conjunctival redness and meibomian gland (MG) assessment] and a questionnaire survey were conducted before and after the reading test. Based on the collected data, the changes in ocular surface damage and subjective symptoms of the subjects were evaluated, and the differences in the diagnostic rate of dry eye before and after high-intensity use of smartphones were compared. Results The diagnostic rate of dry eye was sharply increased (61.7% vs. 74.2%). The severity of dry eye also changed significantly, and the moderate and severe degree increased after reading (10% vs. 15%; 5% vs. 10.8%). The aggravated severity subjects had lower MG expressibility and more evident bulbar conjunctival redness compared to the non-aggravated severity subjects. After 2 h of continuous reading, NIBUT-First, NIBUT-Average and FBUT-Average were significantly decreased, while the proportion of BUT ≤ 5 s increased significantly. Non-invasive keratograph tear meniscus height(NIKTMH) decreased significantly compared to the baseline level, while the proportion of NIKTMH<0.20 mm increased significantly. No significant difference was observed in the Schirmer I test and CFS score between the two groups. Compared to the baseline, evident aggravation was observed in bulbar conjunctival redness. The Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) was significantly higher than the baseline after the reading test. Conclusion Diagnostic indicators related to dry eye are rapidly deteriorating after high-intensity smartphone use, especially those with lower MG expressibility and ocular redness. High-intensity smartphone use can increase the false positive rate of dry eye diagnosis by disturbing ocular surface homeostasis.
Tear film change and ocular symptoms after reading printed book and electronic book: a crossover study

Pinnita Prabhasawat,Warinyupa Pinitpuwadol,Dawisa Angsriprasert,Pratuangsri Chonpimai,Manutsawin Saiman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10384-018-00648-1

2019-01-02

Japanese Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:PurposeTo evaluate and compare tear film changes and ocular symptoms after reading an electronic book (e-book) and a printed book.Study designClinical and experimental.MethodsCrossover study was conducted in 30 healthy volunteers, some of whom read an e-book and others a printed book for 20 minutes and then switched the following week. Tear meniscus height (TMH), non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), fluorescein break up time (FBUT), corneal and conjunctival staining score, and questionnaires about seven ocular symptoms were evaluated before and after reading by both reading methods.ResultsAfter reading an e-book, FBUT and NIBUT were significantly decreased (p<0.001for both). Similar to printed book readers (p=0.006, p=0.04, respectively). TMH and corneal and conjunctival staining score showed no significant differences in either group. Comparing the two groups, the e-book group showed more decrease in TMH, FBUT, and NIBUT (p>0.05). Ocular symptoms were significantly increased in both groups. The e-book group showed more increase in all symptoms, but only tearing (p=0.03) and burning sensation (p=0.02) were significantly different.ConclusionsReading an e-book affected tear film instability and significantly increased burning sensation and tearing to a larger extend than reading a printed book.

ophthalmology
Proper Rest During the Long-Time Reading on Smartphones May Be a Convenient and Effective Pevention Strategy for DED and Asthenopia

Ning Wang,Jinjin Min,Xiaojing Fan,Kelan Yuan,Yi Wu,Xin Wang,Yujie Mou,Chunyang Wang,Xiuming Jin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-1880818/v1

2022-01-01

Abstract:Purpose The study aims to evaluate the effect of proper rest during the long-time smartphone reading on DED and asthenopia. Methods Healthy participants over the age of 18 were randomly allocated to three groups and each individual accepted 2h smartphone reading task. After 1h each group took different rest methods: no rest (group A), eye-closed rest for 10mins (group B), eye-closed joint eye drops rest for 10mins (group C). Before and after the reading task, DED and asthenopia were evaluated by the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), critical flicker frequency (CFF), non-invasive break-up time (NIBUT), fluorescein break-up time (FBUT), corneal fluorescein staining (CFS), and the Schirmer I test (SIT). Results 90 qualified volunteers were recruited, including 29 males and 61 females, aged 22–30 years. After the reading task, all indexes in group A showed the degree of DED and asthenopia were worse than that before reading. Most indexes of DED and asthenopia had no obvious change in group B and group C, especially the CFS results improved (P > 0.05) in group C. Conclusions Our results suggested that taking proper rest during the long-time reading on smartphones may be a convenient and effective prevention strategy for DED and asthenopia.
Determining the Best Management Strategy for Preventing Short-Term Effects of Digital Display Use on Dry Eyes

Cristian Talens-Estarelles,José Vicente García-Marqués,Alejandro Cerviño,Santiago García-Lázaro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000921

2022-10-01

Abstract:Objectives: To assess and compare the effectiveness of four main management strategies for preventing short-term effects of digital display use on dry eye signs and symptoms. Methods: The ocular surface, tear film, and visual fatigue of 47 healthy individuals were assessed before and after reading on a laptop computer for 20 min under five different experimental conditions: control, instillation of artificial tears, taking a brief break, using a blue light screen filter, and blink control. Measurements included the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) Questionnaire, 5-item Dry Eye Questionnaire (DEQ-5), tear meniscus height (TMH), noninvasive keratograph break-up time (NIKBUT), bulbar conjunctival redness, and pupil size. Results: Worse results were obtained after the control and blue light filter conditions in all variables (P≤0.037). A higher post-task DEQ-5 score (P=0.013) and TMH (P<0.0005) were obtained when taking a brief break compared with pretask, although the increase in symptoms was significantly smaller than that observed in the nonmanagement control condition (P≤0.036). Similarly, a smaller increase in OSDI and DEQ-5 was obtained with the use of artificial tears and blink control in comparison with the control condition (P≤0.008), whereas a greater increase in DEQ-5 and decrease in NIKBUT was obtained for the blue light filter condition in comparison with the instillation of artificial tears (P=0.017) or blink control (P=0.008), respectively. Finally, a significantly lower post-task pupil size was obtained for all the conditions (P≤0.027). Conclusions: The instillation of artificial tears and blink control were the best management strategies for preventing short-term effects of digital display use on dry eyes. Conversely, using a blue light filter did not offer any benefits.
Visual consequences of electronic reader use: a pilot study

Marlon M Maducdoc,Asghar Haider,Angèle Nalbandian,Julie H Youm,Payam V Morgan,Robert W Crow

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10792-016-0281-9

Abstract:Background: With the increasing prevalence of electronic readers (e-readers) for vocational and professional uses, it is important to discover if there are visual consequences in the use of these products. There are no studies in the literature quantifying the incidence or severity of eyestrain, nor are there clinical characteristics that may predispose to these symptoms with e-reader use. Purpose: The primary objective of this pilot study was to assess the degree of eyestrain associated with e-reader use compared to traditional paper format. The secondary outcomes of this study were to assess the rate of eyestrain associated with e-reader use and identify any clinical characteristics that may be associated with the development of eyestrain. Methods: Forty-four students were randomly assigned to study (e-reader iPAD) and control (print) groups. Participant posture, luminosity of the room, and reading distance from reading device were measured during a 1-h session for both groups. At the end of the session, questionnaires were administered to determine symptoms. Results: Significantly higher rates of eyestrain (p = 0.008) and irritation (p = 0.011) were found among the iPAD study group as compared to the print 'control' group. The study group was also 4.9 times more likely to report severe eyestrain (95 % CI [1.4, 16.9]). No clinical characteristics predisposing to eyestrain could be identified. Conclusions: These findings conclude that reading on e-readers may induce increased levels of irritation and eyestrain. Predisposing factors, etiology, and potential remedial interventions remain to be determined.
Proteolytic generation and aggregation of peptides from transmembrane regions: lung surfactant protein C and amyloid β-peptide

J. Johansson,T. Weaver,L. Tjernberg

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00018-003-3274-6

2004-02-01

Abstract:
Ocular surface changes following computer use in post‐LASIK patients

Cristian Talens‐Estarelles,Clara Talens‐Estarelles,Santiago García‐Lázaro

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/opo.13297

2024-02-23

Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics

Abstract:Purpose To assess the impact of computer use on the ocular surface of individuals after laser in situ keratomileusis (LASIK). Methods The dry eye symptoms and ocular surface of 18 post‐LASIK young individuals and 18 controls were evaluated before and after performing a 30‐min task on a computer without (Visit 1) and with (Visit 2) initial instillation of artificial tears. Symptoms were assessed using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), Symptom Assessment in Dry Eye questionnaire version two (SANDE II) and Computer Vision Syndrome Questionnaire (CVS‐Q). The ocular surface was assessed by measuring corneal higher order aberrations, tear meniscus height (TMH), conjunctival redness, blink rate and incomplete blinking, lipid layer thickness (LLT) and non‐invasive keratograph break‐up time (NIKBUT). Results SANDE II scores were >0 after the computer task in both groups (p ≤ 0.01). SANDE II and CVS‐Q scores did not differ between LASIK and controls (p ≥ 0.43). Greater bulbar–temporal conjunctival redness, TMH and LLT and shorter NIKBUT were found after computer use in the LASIK group (p ≤ 0.04), whereas no changes were observed in the controls (p ≥ 0.20). Lower SANDE II and CVS‐Q scores were reported at Visit 2 compared with Visit 1 in both groups (p ≤ 0.01). Likewise, no worsening of dry eye signs was observed at Visit 2 (p ≥ 0.11). Conclusions Ocular symptoms reported during computer use were comparable between the groups. However, a worsening of dry eye signs was mostly observed in post‐LASIK individuals. The instillation of artificial tears was effective in preventing the effects of computer use on the ocular surface in post‐LASIK patients.

ophthalmology
[The clinical value of using a distant-image screen for reading and learning]

Y Zhen,W Zhang,J Shen,D W Cheng,W R Shen,N L Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20220106-00004

2022-12-11

Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effect and comfort of using a distant-image screen for reading and learning. Methods: It was a prospective cross-over study. Thirty-nine volunteers, including 13 males and 26 females, aged (26.4±4.5) years (20 to 37 years), were recruited from Beijing Tongren Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University in July 2021. The volunteers read the digital correction table printed on paper and displayed on a distant-image screen in a random order and rest in an interval of 2 hours. Reading speed, efficiency and accuracy of using the two devices were recorded, and the changes of logMAR vision, diopter, flicker fusion frequency and visual fatigue score after reading were calculated. Comparison of the quantitative data was performed using the paired t-test. Results: The speed, accuracy and efficiency were (41.2±11.6) digit groups/min, 80.7%±13.3% and (32.4±7.4) digit groups/min in reading on paper, (41.7±11.1) digit groups/min, 76.4%±12.6% and (31.1±6.4) digit groups/min in reading from screen, respectively. There was no significant difference in reading speed (t=-0.462, P=0.648) and reading efficiency (t=1.954, P=0.058), but there was significant difference in reading accuracy (t= 2.226, P=0.032). The logMAR visual acuity of right eye and left eye decreased by 0.014±0.032 and 0.013±0.050 after reading on paper, but increased by 0.007±0.033 and 0.007±0.036 after reading from screen, respectively. The difference was significant (right eye, t=2.592, P=0.013; left eye, t =2.154, P=0.038). The myopia degree of right eye and left eye increased by (0.07±0.29) D and (0.06±0.24) D after reading on paper, and increased by (0.01±0.29) D and (0.02±0.28) D after reading from screen, respectively. The flicker fusion frequency decreased by (0.1±1.0) Hz after reading on paper, but increased by (0.3±1.2) Hz after reading from screen. There was no significant difference (P>0.05). The subjective scale score of visual fatigue increased in both groups, with no statistically significant difference (t=1.165, P=0.251). Conclusion: The use of a distant-image screen for reading and learning does not affect the reading efficiency or increase the visual fatigue, and can avoid the decline of visual acuity caused by near viewing compared with using the printed matter.
Visual Fatigue Induced by Viewing a Tablet Computer with a High-resolution Display

Dong Ju Kim,Chi-Yeon Lim,Namyi Gu,Choul Yong Park

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/kjo.2016.0095

2017-01-01

Korean Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:PURPOSE: In the present study, the visual discomfort induced by smart mobile devices was assessed in normal and healthy adults.METHODS: Fifty-nine volunteers (age, 38.16 ± 10.23 years; male : female = 19 : 40) were exposed to tablet computer screen stimuli (iPad Air, Apple Inc.) for 1 hour. Participants watched a movie or played a computer game on the tablet computer. Visual fatigue and discomfort were assessed using an asthenopia questionnaire, tear film break-up time, and total ocular wavefront aberration before and after viewing smart mobile devices.RESULTS: Based on the questionnaire, viewing smart mobile devices for 1 hour significantly increased mean total asthenopia score from 19.59 ± 8.58 to 22.68 ± 9.39 (p < 0.001). Specifically, the scores for five items (tired eyes, sore/aching eyes, irritated eyes, watery eyes, and hot/burning eye) were significantly increased by viewing smart mobile devices. Tear film break-up time significantly decreased from 5.09 ± 1.52 seconds to 4.63 ± 1.34 seconds (p = 0.003). However, total ocular wavefront aberration was unchanged.CONCLUSIONS: Visual fatigue and discomfort were significantly induced by viewing smart mobile devices, even though the devices were equipped with state-of-the-art display technology.
TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of the digital environment on the ocular surface

James S Wolffsohn,Gareth Lingham,Laura E Downie,Byki Huntjens,Takenori Inomata,Saleel Jivraj,Emmanuel Kobia-Acquah,Alex Muntz,Karim Mohamed-Noriega,Sotiris Plainis,Michael Read,Rony R Sayegh,Sumeer Singh,Tor P Utheim,Jennifer P Craig

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtos.2023.04.004

Abstract:Eye strain when performing tasks reliant on a digital environment can cause discomfort, affecting productivity and quality of life. Digital eye strain (the preferred terminology) was defined as "the development or exacerbation of recurrent ocular symptoms and/or signs related specifically to digital device screen viewing". Digital eye strain prevalence of up to 97% has been reported, due to no previously agreed definition/diagnostic criteria and limitations of current questionnaires which fail to differentiate such symptoms from those arising from non-digital tasks. Objective signs such as blink rate or critical flicker frequency changes are not 'diagnostic' of digital eye strain nor validated as sensitive. The mechanisms attributed to ocular surface disease exacerbation are mainly reduced blink rate and completeness, partial/uncorrected refractive error and/or underlying binocular vision anomalies, together with the cognitive demand of the task and differences in position, size, brightness and glare compared to an equivalent non-digital task. In general, interventions are not well established; patients experiencing digital eye strain should be provided with a full refractive correction for the appropriate working distances. Improving blinking, optimizing the work environment and encouraging regular breaks may help. Based on current, best evidence, blue-light blocking interventions do not appear to be an effective management strategy. More and larger clinical trials are needed to assess artificial tear effectiveness for relieving digital eye strain, particularly comparing different constituents; a systematic review within the report identified use of secretagogues and warm compress/humidity goggles/ambient humidifiers as promising strategies, along with nutritional supplementation (such as omega-3 fatty acid supplementation and berry extracts).
Impact of computer use on children's vision

N Kozeis

Hippokratia

Abstract:Today, millions of children use computers on a daily basis. Extensive viewing of the computer screen can lead to eye discomfort, fatigue, blurred vision and headaches, dry eyes and other symptoms of eyestrain. These symptoms may be caused by poor lighting, glare, an improper work station set-up, vision problems of which the person was not previously aware, or a combination of these factors. Children can experience many of the same symptoms related to computer use as adults. However, some unique aspects of how children use computers may make them more susceptible than adults to the development of these problems. In this study, the most common eye symptoms related to computer use in childhood, the possible causes and ways to avoid them are reviewed.
Lighting-Induced Changes in Central and Peripheral Retinal Thickness and Shape after Short-Term Reading Tasks in Electronic Devices

Elvira Orduna-Hospital,Francisco J. Ávila,Guisela Fernández-Espinosa,Ana Sanchez-Cano

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/photonics9120990

IF: 2.536

2022-12-17

Photonics

Abstract:Background: To assess retinal and optical changes associated with near vision reading for different lighting conditions in electronic screens. Methods: Twenty-four young healthy subjects participated in the study; an iPad and an Ebook were chosen as stimuli for 5 min of reading task with different lighting conditions. Central and peripheral retinal thicknesses in the macular ETDRS areas by optical coherence tomography were analyzed. Results: Significant differences were found between basal retinal thickness and retinal thickness after reading with iPad and high illumination, in the N6 (p = 0.021) and I6 (p = 0.049) areas, and low illumination (S3: p = 0.008, N3: p = 0.018, I3: p = 0.021, N6: p = 0.018 and I6: p = 0.020), being thinner after reading. The same trend was observed after reading with an Ebook and high lighting in the N3 (p = 0.037) and N6 (p = 0.028). For low lighting conditions, only retinal thinning was observed. After reading, retinal shape analysis revealed significant changes from computed basal eccentricity for high lighting conditions only. At the periphery, those differences in eccentricity values were statistically significant for both lighting conditions. Conclusions: Young people can recover visual quality after 5 min of reading tasks at different lighting levels on electronic devices, while peripheral retinal expansion remains altered, especially at low lighting levels.

optics
The influences of smartphone use on the status of the tear film and ocular surface

Jung Han Choi,Ying Li,Seon Ho Kim,Rujun Jin,Yung Hui Kim,Won Choi,In Cheon You,Kyung Chul Yoon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206541

IF: 3.7

2018-10-31

PLoS ONE

Abstract:PURPOSE: To investigate the influences of smartphone use on ocular symptoms, status of the tear film, and oxidative stress indices in the tears and at the ocular surface.METHODS: Eighty healthy volunteers were enrolled in the study. Subjective symptoms and asthenopia were evaluated using the ocular surface disease index (OSDI), visual analogue scale (VAS), and computer vision syndrome (CVS) score before and after smartphone or computer display (control) use. The status of the tear film was evaluated using fluorescein film break-up time (FBUT), non-invasive keratograph break up time (NIKBUT), Schirmer score, keratoepitheliopathy (KEP), and tear meniscus height (TMH). Oxidative stress markers in the tear film including hexanoyl lysine (HEL), 4-hydroxy-2-nonenal (4-HNE), malondialdehyde (MDA), and 8-oxo-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) in the tear film were measured using ELISA. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) at the ocular surface were measured through 2',7'-dichloro-dihydrofluorescein diacetate. All measurements were conducted at baseline, and after use for 1 and 4 h.RESULTS: All parameters showed no significant group-wise differences at baseline. Scores of OSDI, VAS, fatigue, burning sensation, and dryness showed significant increases after 1 and 4 h of smartphone use compared with those at baseline (all P < 0.05). The smartphone group showed higher OSDI, fatigue, burning, and dryness scores than the control group at 4 h. Smartphone use showed significantly decreased FBUT and NIBUT at 4 h than those at baseline (P < 0.01). In the smartphone group, the concentration of HEL significantly increased at 4 h compared with that at baseline and 1 h (P < 0.01). Both groups showed increased ROS with higher value in the smartphone group versus the control group at 4 h (P < 0.01).CONCLUSIONS: Smartphone use could not only aggravate subjective symptom indices such as the OSDI, VAS, and CVS but also induce tear film instability and oxidative stress indices in the tears and at the ocular surface.

multidisciplinary sciences
Tear Film Dynamics in Visual Display Terminal Users: A Review of Impact on Goblet Cells, Lacrimal and Meibomian Gland Function

Moumi Maity,Anat Galor,Sayan Basu,Swati Singh

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08820538.2024.2332355

2024-04-19

Seminars in Ophthalmology

Abstract:Purpose The prevalence of dry eye disease (DED) is rising among visual display terminal (VDT) users, a trend that correlates with the growing use of digital devices. The prevalence of VDT-associated DED is reported based on dry eye questionnaires; however, VDT's impact on tear film parameters is less understood.

ophthalmology
Digital Screen Use and Dry Eye: A Review

Divy Mehra,Anat Galor

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/apo.0000000000000328

2020-11-01

Abstract:Prolonged and continuous daily use of digital screens, or visual display terminals (VDTs), has become the norm in occupational, educational, and recreational settings. An increased global dependence on VDTs has led to a rise in associated visual complaints, including eye strain, ocular dryness, burning, blurred vision, and irritation, to name a few. The principal causes for VDT-associated visual discomfort are abnormalities with oculomotor/vergence systems and dry eye (DE). This review focuses on the latter, as advances in research have identified symptomology and ocular surface parameters that are shared between prolonged VDT users and DE, particularly the evaporative subtype. Several mechanisms have been implicated in VDT-associated DE, including blink anomalies, damaging light emission from modern devices, and inflammatory changes. The presence of preexisting DE has also been explored as an inciting and exacerbating factor. We review the associations between digital screens and DE, mechanisms of damage, and therapeutic options, hoping to raise awareness of this entity with the goal of reducing the global morbidity and economic impact of screen-associated visual disability.

ophthalmology
Dry eye in primary care: the relationship between digital display device usage and dry eye syndrome (DES) in medical students

Elif Sedanur Utlu,Mustafa Bayraktar,Bahadır Utlu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmac155

2024-06-12

Abstract:Objective: As digital display devices become more and more indispensable, associated health problems have started to increase. We aimed to investigate the frequency and relationship of digital display device usage behaviours and dry eye syndrome (DES) in medical students. Methods: An observational, cross-sectional study was conducted on medical school students who voluntarily participated in our study online, about the duration and variety of their digital screen use, usage patterns, and protective measures, together with the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire. Where necessary, the Schirmer-I, tear break-up time, and fluorescein staining tests were carried out. Results: Of the 255 participants, 75.3% (n = 192) were female, 63.1% (n = 161) had no refractive vision defects, and 45.9% used smartphones for more than 5 h a day. According to the OSDI scores for DES screening, only 36.1% of the participants were normal, 17.3% had mild DES, 20.4% had moderate DES, and 26.3% had severe DES. A positive correlation was found between digital display usage time in hours per day and a high OSDI score. As the distance between the eye and the screen decreased, the DES score increased, which is significant for computer, e-book, and tablet use (P < 0.005). The DES rate of the 25 participants who underwent further evaluation was 40% for the tear break-up time test and 52% for the fluorescein staining test. Conclusion: The high prevalence of DES due to digital screen use among medical school students highlights the importance of DES screening as a preventive measure in family medicine.
Influence of Lifestyle Factors on Ocular Surface Parameters in Relation to Age

Jacobo Garcia-Queiruga,Hugo Pena-Verdeal,Belen Sabucedo-Villamarin,Veronica Noya-Padin,Maria J. Giraldez,Eva Yebra-Pimentel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/life14111460

2024-11-13

Life

Abstract:Purpose: To evaluate how Video Display Terminal (VDT) use, Contact Lens (CL) wear, and eyedrop use affect ocular surface parameters in participants with ocular discomfort and how these factors may vary across different age groups. Methods: The current cross-sectional study initially involved a total of 252 participants who completed a self-administered survey to collect information about ocular discomfort and lifestyle factors. This online survey was composed of an Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire and three extra questions regarding lifestyle factors (VDT use, CL wear, and eyedrop use). Only 185 symptomatic participants, those with OSDI values > 12, were scheduled to undergo a comprehensive ocular examination that included tear film osmolarity, Fluorescein Break-Up Time (FBUT), Maximum Blink Interval (MBI), and corneal staining. Results: Differences in ocular parameters and lifestyle factors across age groups ( 60 years) were analyzed, along with their correlations and regression. Significant age group differences were found in OSDI, osmolarity, FBUT, and MBI (One-way ANOVA, all p ≤ 0.029). Correlations were observed between CL wear and osmolarity and MBI (Pearson's correlation, both p ≤ 0.049). Multiple regression confirmed age associations with OSDI, osmolarity, FBUT, and MBI (Multiple linear regression, all p ≤ 0.040) and found links between VDT use and osmolarity and MBI (Multiple linear regression, both p ≤ 0.038) and between eyedrop use and OSDI (Multiple linear regression, p = 0.040). Conclusion: Aging is a primary factor affecting ocular homeostasis, with older adults showing lower FBUT and MBI values and higher osmolarity. Prolonged use of VDTs exacerbates this effect, further contributing to ocular discomfort and destabilized tear film. No associations between CL wear and any of the ocular parameters were found. Eyedrop use shows varied effects on ocular comfort across age groups, emphasizing the need for age-specific ocular care. Overall, these findings confirm that aging and extended VDT use play a significant role in ocular surface discomfort.

biology
Assessment of tear film parameters post-treatment with commercial eyelid cleaning wipes: a pilot study

Amal Aldarwesh,Ali Almustanyir,Raied Fagehi,Khalaf Alruways,Abdulaziz Bin Turki,Mansour Alghamdi,Muteb Khalaf Alanazi,Balsam Alabdulkader,Wafa Alotaibi,Mosaad Alhassan,,,,,,,,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.18240/ijo.2024.04.08

IF: 1.645

2024-04-18

International Journal of Ophthalmology

Abstract:AIM: To investigate the short-term effects of commercially available eyelid-cleaning wipes on film parameters. METHODS: This study enrolled 48 healthy participants aged 20-35y (both males and females). Clinical assessment included the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) questionnaire, non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT), tear meniscus height (TMH), and lipid layer pattern (LLP). Based on these initial results, participants were categorized as either non-dry eye or dry eye. Participants in each group were randomly allocated to either Blephaclean® or Systane® treatments. Changes in NITBUT, TMH, and LLP levels before and after lid wipe treatment were assessed. RESULTS: The dry eye group exhibited significantly higher OSDI scores and lower NITBUT and TMH levels than in the non-dry eye group (P 0.05). Similarly, the LLP levels were significantly improved with Systane® (P<0.001) post-treatment compared to individuals in the non-dry eye group. However, the dry eye subjects showed higher post-treatment LLP levels than the untreated group (P<0.02). CONCLUSION: The short-term effects of Systane® eyelid wipes on tear film parameters suggest their effectiveness in dry eye disease. Nonetheless, further exploration of their long-term impact is essential to justify their cost effectiveness and efficacy in treating both aqueous deficiency and evaporative dryness.

ophthalmology

No-donors: an emerging class of compounds in medicinal chemistry.

Effects on the Ocular Surface from Reading on Different Smartphone Screens: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study.

Closing Eyes with Artificial Tears: A Simple and Effective Strategy to Combat Screen-Related Asthenopia and Dry Eye Symptoms

High-Intensity Use of Smartphone Can Significantly Increase the Diagnostic Rate and Severity of Dry Eye

Tear film change and ocular symptoms after reading printed book and electronic book: a crossover study

Proper Rest During the Long-Time Reading on Smartphones May Be a Convenient and Effective Pevention Strategy for DED and Asthenopia

Determining the Best Management Strategy for Preventing Short-Term Effects of Digital Display Use on Dry Eyes

Visual consequences of electronic reader use: a pilot study

Proteolytic generation and aggregation of peptides from transmembrane regions: lung surfactant protein C and amyloid β-peptide

Ocular surface changes following computer use in post‐LASIK patients

[The clinical value of using a distant-image screen for reading and learning]

Visual Fatigue Induced by Viewing a Tablet Computer with a High-resolution Display

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of the digital environment on the ocular surface

Impact of computer use on children's vision

Lighting-Induced Changes in Central and Peripheral Retinal Thickness and Shape after Short-Term Reading Tasks in Electronic Devices

The influences of smartphone use on the status of the tear film and ocular surface

Tear Film Dynamics in Visual Display Terminal Users: A Review of Impact on Goblet Cells, Lacrimal and Meibomian Gland Function

Digital Screen Use and Dry Eye: A Review

Dry eye in primary care: the relationship between digital display device usage and dry eye syndrome (DES) in medical students

Influence of Lifestyle Factors on Ocular Surface Parameters in Relation to Age

Assessment of tear film parameters post-treatment with commercial eyelid cleaning wipes: a pilot study