Abstract:In addition domestic R&D investment,China has been relying on international R&D spillovers from the developed country to grow its economy.International spillovers consist of international trade,foreign direct investment(FDI),and direct(intangible) spillovers.Intangible spillovers include reverse engineering,students returning from foreign countries,dialog between academic researchers,information exchange through electronic means,academic journals,and international conferences,and so on.Researchers begin paying attention to direct R&D spillovers in addition to trade and FDI. Based on Coe and Helpman's(1995) proposed model,we evaluate the contribution of domestic and direct foreign R&D stocks to the total factor productivity(TFP) of different provinces in China.First evaluation result shows that the elasticity of TFP to the domestic R&D stock is between 0.34 and 0.47.This finding implies that domestic R&D investment is the major source of technological improvement in China.Second evaluation result shows that the elasticity of TFP to the direct foreign R&D stock is 0.06.This finding implies that direct foreign R&D spillovers have significant impact on TFP.However,its impact on TFP is weaker than that of domestic R&D investment.Third evaluation result shows that the domestic and direct foreign R&D stocks are complementary for TFP growth. The previous research primarily analyzes the effect of technology spillovers on OLS method.These studies have the major limitation that the impact of independent variables(IVs) on conditional dependent variable(DV) at different locations is assumed to be constant.According to the assumption,the mean estimate of OLS cannot reflect the differential impact of IVs on the conditional DV at difference locations. Is the impact of direct foreign R&D spillovers on the TFP in thirty provinces constant even though so much provinces heterogeneity exists? The quantile regression helps to answer this question.The results show that when TTP's quantile increases,the elasticity of TFP to direct foreign R&D stocks decreases dramatically from 0.14 and 0.02.This indicates that the contribution of direct foreign R&D spillovers to the TFP decreases while the TFP rises.There are two possible reasons for this negative correlation.First,imitative innovation is more difficult in provinces with higher TFP than in those with lower TFP. Second,direct international R&D spillovers have some limitations.Different from technology imports and patents purchases,direct technology spillovers is not effective for developing countries,such as China,to acquire critical technologies.This finding indicates that non-critical and general technological knowledge obtained through direct technology spillovers has higher effect on the growth of TFP in provinces with lower TFP than that in provinces with higher TFP.

Technical standardization and total factor productivity in innovation-driven development: Evidence from China

The Performance of Industrial Productivity Across Regions of China: Structural Differences, Institutional Shocks and Dynamic Characteristics

Industrial Productivity Performance in Chinese Regions (1987–2002): a Decomposition Approach

Digital economy: An innovation driver for total factor productivity

Internal Drivers and the Specialization Status of Under-Developed Countries: Evidence from China'S High-Tech Industry

On the Technical Efficiency of New Product in Chinese Provincial Industry

R&D Efforts, Total Factor Productivity, and the Energy Intensity in China

Industrial Innovation Investments and the Quality of Urban Economic Growth in China

Non-Linear Nexus of Technological Innovation and Carbon Total Factor Productivity in China

Direct International R&D Spillover and Total Factor Productivity in China: Empirical Research Based on Quantile Regression

Digital transformation, total factor productivity, and firm innovation investment

Identifying the drivers of new product development performance change in China's high-tech industry: A two-stage production-theoretical decomposition analysis

Industrial Policy Intensity, Technological Change, and Productivity Growth: Evidence from China

Towards sustainable development: How does technological innovation drive the increase in green total factor productivity?

China's Regional Differences in Technical Efficiency and the Decomposition of Total Factor Productivity Growth(1978—2003)

Toward Sustainable Development: Unleashing the Mechanism Among International Technology Spillover, Institutional Quality, and Green Innovation Capability

Can Digital Innovation Improve Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from Digital Patents of China

TFP,Technological Choice and the Economic Growth of the Yangtze Delta

Financial Development and Total Factor Productivity Growth: Evidence from China

Analysis over factors of innovation in China’s fast economic growth since its beginning of reform and opening up

How does digital technology affect total factor productivity in manufacturing industries? Empirical evidence from China