Carpal Trauma—A Diagnostic Problem

C. Sollerman
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/028418518802900119
1988-01-01
Acta Radiologica
Abstract:'In every case of closed injury to the wrist with no obvious deformity, one must assume the presence of a scaphoid fracture until radiological proof of the contrary' (10). This statement still governs the treatment of carpal trauma, but unfortunately the 'radiologic proof is often difficult to obtain. Radiographs of acutely fractured scaphoid bones are sometimes negative or inconclusive and repeated examinations are often needed to establish the diagnosis. Thus, plaster immobilization of injured wrist joints with tenderness of the scaphoid region is often recommended regardless of the radiographic examination. This principle, however, results in overtreatment of patients with minor wrist sprains leading to economic consequences for the community and discomfort to the patients. Plaster treatment of patients with negative findings at radiography has, however, been debated. LESLIE & DICKSON (7) claimed that fractures that cannot be visualized on the first radiograph will heal under almost any circumstances. On the contrary, LINDSTROM (8) found in a series of 75 pseudarthrosis that 50 per cent of the cases had never been immobilized. This finding might indicate that plaster treatment promotes fracture healing-and LINDSTROM concluded that delayed or failed immobilization of scaphoid fractures increases the incidence of pseudarthrosis. In spite of this overtreatment program there are still cases where a scaphoid fracture is missed. The legal aspect is evident, as (at least in Sweden) a patient with an overlooked scaphoid fracture is compensated by the Patient's Insurance Company and the radiologist responsible for the missed diagnosis might under certain circumstances be sued. Thus, our diagnostic methods in carpal trauma are far from ideal producing both false negative and false positive results and there is every reason to develop the diagnostic efforts. Two articles in this issue describe improved diagnostic methods in carpal trauma. LANGER ANDERSEN et coil. (6) focus on the hematoma produced by a scaphoid fracture which is shown by displacement of 'the fat stripe'. This effect enables the radiologist to establish a fracture diagnosis with higher accuracy than if a fracture must be detected on the radiographs. Detecting hemarthrosis is an important part of a fracture diagnosis and could be made by other methods, such as sonography (9) or by aspiration of blood. In this context, one might speculate on the effects produced by the hematoma. WINGSTRAND et colI. (II) showed that hemarthrosis in undisplaced fractures of the collum femoris may cause femoral head ischemia. Does a similar mechanism exist in scaphoid fractures and could tamponade be a factor promoting pseudarthrosis') Further studies with new techniques might answer these questions. BRISMAR'S study (I) utilizing scintimetry in carpal trauma is of interest as many fractures are diagnosed before radiographic evidence is apparent. Scintimetry is the method of choice when a fracture is suspected, but the radiograph is inconclusive. The most surprising result in BRISMAR'S study, however, is the high percentage of injuries to other carpal bones than the scaphoid. These findings may reflect that a wrist trauma in many cases results in carpal injuries (ligamentous or skeletal) which are not diagnosed with the standard methods. Most injuries are harmless and heal uneventfully, but some patients with ligamentous ruptures may present with chronic carpal instability many years after the trauma (2). The treatment of chronic carpal instability is a matter of debate, but some authors advocate early repair of ligamentous injuries (5), which naturally implies an early diagnosis. Carpal trauma is a common injury and the number of patients with chronic pain problems from the wrist joint seem to increase (3). The future is encouraging regarding the possibilities to improve the diagnostic methods and many new techiques such as ultrasound, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging are already tested (4, 9), More liberate use of these techniques will without any doubts completely change our treatment program of carpal injuries.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?