"Barriers and Advantages of Self-Sampling Tests, for HPV Diagnosis: A Qualitative Field Experience Before Implementation in a Rural Community in Ecuador"
Bernardo Vega-Crespo,Vivian Alejandra Neira,Ruth Maldonado - Rengel,Diana López,Dayanara Delgado-López,Gabriela Guerra Astudillo,Veronique Verhoeven
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.s455118
2024-05-29
International Journal of Women s Health
Abstract:Bernardo Vega-Crespo, 1 Vivian Alejandra Neira, 2, 3 Ruth Maldonado - Rengel, 4 Diana López, 3 Dayanara Delgado-López, 1 Gabriela Guerra Astudillo, 1 Veronique Verhoeven 5 1 Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador; 2 Departamento de Biociencias, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad de Cuenca, Cuenca, Ecuador; 3 Facultad de Medicina, Universidad del Azuay, Cuenca, Ecuador; 4 Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Loja, Ecuador; 5 Family Medicine and Population Health, Antwerp University, Antwerp, Belgium Correspondence: Bernardo Vega-Crespo, Facultad de Ciencias Médicas, Universidad de Cuenca, 12 of April Avenue and Loja Avenue, Cuenca, 010203, Ecuador, Tel +593998276441, Email Introduction: Cervical cancer screening has demonstrated high efficacy in reducing cervical cancer mortality worldwide. However, clinician sampling is often perceived as an uncomfortable procedure that could reduce screening uptake. Self-sampling methods for HPV diagnosis have shown high sensitivity, which could increase acceptance and screening rates among women. Purpose: This study aims to identify the perceived barriers and advantages of self-sampling methods versus clinician sampling for cervical cancer screening in a rural setting in Ecuador. Patients and Methods: A qualitative study was conducted. Seven focus group discussions took place in the rural Parish of El Valle in Azuay Province, Cuenca, Ecuador. Women native to this rural area were included in the study. FGDs were recorded and transcribed, and content analysis was performed to categorize and analyze the data. Results: A total of 45 women participated in the study. Clinician sampling was perceived as a painful and intrusive method. However, participants believed that it is more reliable compared to self-sampling methods, attributing this to the direct visualization of the cervix, which facilitates the detection of cervical pathologies. The perceived advantages of self-sampling included increased comfort, pain reduction, time savings, the ability to perform the test at home, and the potential for widespread availability through pharmacies or local traditional healers. Nevertheless, doubts about the test's reliability as well as the user's proficiency in self-testing posed barriers to the adoption of this technique. Conclusion: Self-sampling methods offer several advantages over clinician sampling, such as enhanced privacy, comfort, and accessibility to cancer screening. Barriers primarily revolved around users' proficiency in performing the test and the reliability of the results. Providing training for using self-sampling tests could address these barriers. Keywords: cervical cancer, self-sampling, acceptance, barriers and facilitators Since 1970, mortality from cervical cancer has witnessed a 70% reduction in developed countries. This remarkable decline can be attributed to the widespread adoption of large-scale population screenings, vaccination against the human papillomavirus (HPV), and the precise monitoring and treatment of premalignant lesions. 1 Around 80% of cervical cancer deaths occur in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs); 2 the disparities in cervical cancer prevention policies and the low coverage of screening could explain the higher rates observed in those countries. 3,4 In Ecuador, cervical cancer (CC) ranks as the second most common form of cancer in women. In 2020 alone, 1534 new cases were identified, leading to the unfortunate loss of 813 women to CC. 5 Regrettably, the number of deaths and new cases in the country has not exhibited a discernible reduction over the past decade. 6,7 Ecuador has a national strategy to prevent CC, primarily centered on cervical screening and vaccination against HPV (human papillomavirus). 8–10 The public health system in Ecuador provides free access to screening, primarily utilizing cytology, for individuals aged 21 to 65 years, with screening intervals of 3 years. Additionally, the system offers vaccination for girls aged 9 to 14 years, as part of the strategy to combat cervical cancer. 11 Despite these governmental efforts, 41.6% of women in Ecuador have never been screened. 12 Several barriers to CC screening, described in the international literature, are prevalent in Ecuador. The most common obstacles include extended waiting times, lack of privacy, feelings of embarrassment, and individual factors such as anxiety, discomfort, etc. 13,14 Additionally, the lack of risk perception and knowledge about CC could pose obstac -Abstract Truncated-
obstetrics & gynecology