Abstract:Abstract Background/Introduction Several variables such as clinical, socioeconomic, functional or cognitive, among others can have an impact on the prognosis of heart failure (HF) patients despite the optimisation of follow-up strategies (e.g. telemedicine [TM] solutions). The clustering of HF patients may to identify different patient frailty phenotypes. Purpose The aim of this study was to perform a machine learning-based clustering analysis to identify different patient frailty phenotypes in a cohort of HF patients recruited in a randomized clinical trial (The Insuficiència Cardíaca Optimitzaciό Remota [iCOR] study). Methods We performed the clustering analysis on the basis of 8 frailty-related dimensions. To define the number of clusters, dissimilarity matrix was calculated with Gower's distance. Then, hierarchical divisive clustering was performed. Using then Elbow and Silhouette to analyse how the within sum of squares changes for the different number of clusters, the final number of clusters were chosen. The incidence proportion of the each of the study endpoints (non-fatal HF events as primary endpoint and all-cause hospitalization, all-cause death and the composite endpoint combining of all-cause death or non-fatal HF events as secondary endpoints) was calculated for cluster. Results 5 different frailty phenotypes were identified. Cluster 1 (29 patients, 16%) comprised patients with the best reported self-perceived health status (QoL), fair emotional-affective status, but low levels of self-care. Cluster 2 (41 patients, 23%) included the youngest patients with the highest level of education and a better level of cognition. Cluster 3 (68, 38%) encompassed the patients who had the best level of self-care behaviour (18.9±9.8), greater physical and instrumental functioning for activities of daily living (ADL) and a lower rate of comorbidities. Patients in the Cluster 4 (30 patients, 17%) tended to be elderly females with poor health-related QoL, and a higher level of functional dependence. Finally, Cluster 5 was the smallest group (10 patients, 6%), encompassing the oldest patients with low level of education, a worse affective-emotional state, a significant cognitive decline and a higher proportion of comorbidities compared to the other clusters. Cluster 4 had the highest incidence rate of the primary endpoint (57 per 100 patient-years at risk, 95% CI [37.4–74–5]) and a higher incidence of all-cause hospitalization and of the combined variable of all-cause of death or non-fatal HF events. Conclusion(s) Using the cluster analysis, we were able to stratify HF patients according to the stage of their impairment and vulnerability in each of the different frailty domains. This will allow clinicians to incorporate holistic multi-domain assessments in HF programmes to identify patients' needs and provide each patient with personalised and structured follow-up programme according to patient's needs (personalised and precision medicine). Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Radar chart to compare frailty clustersClinical endpoints according clusters

Cluster analysis of heart failure patients based on their psychological and physical symptoms and predictive analysis of cluster membership

Frailty phenotypes in patients with heart failure in the early post-discharge period: insights from the iCOR randomised controlled trial and a machine learning-based clustering analysis

Unbiased clustering and molecular characterisation of novel metabolic phenotypes in a heart failure cohort

Somatic symptom disorder symptoms in individuals at risk for heart failure: A cluster analysis with cross-sectional data from a population-based cohort study

Predictors of readmission and health related quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure: a comparison of different psychosocial aspects

Physical Heart Failure Symptom Clusters Predictive of Delay in Seeking Treatment

Network analysis of symptoms, physiological, psychological and environmental risk factors based on unpleasant symptom theory in patients with chronic heart failure

Cluster analysis: a useful technique to identify elderly cardiac patients at risk for poor quality of life

Identifying Phenogroups in Patients with Subclinical Diastolic Dysfunction Using Unsupervised Statistical Learning

Psychosomatic mechanisms of heart failure symptoms on quality of life in patients with chronic heart failure: A multi-centre cross-sectional study

Clinical phenotypes of heart failure patients with supranormal ejection fraction

The Effect of Heart Failure Symptom Clusters on Quality of Life: The Moderating Effect of Self‐Care Behaviours

Symptom Cluster Profiles among Community-residing Older Adults with Heart Failure: Findings from the U.S. Health and Retirement Study

Phenotype clustering of hospitalized high-risk patients with COVID-19 — a machine learning approach within the multicentre, multinational PCHF-COVICAV registry

The Utility of Predicting Hospitalizations Among Patients With Heart Failure Using mHealth: Observational Study

Symptoms of fatigue in chronic heart failure patients: Clinical and psychological predictors

Long-term outcomes of phenoclusters in preclinical heart failure with preserved and mildly reduced ejection fraction

Characterising symptom clusters in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing catheter ablation

Phenogrouping heart failure with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction using electronic health record data

Machine learning based on biomarker profiles identifies distinct subgroups of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

Clusters of multidimensional exercise response patterns and estimated heart failure risk in the Framingham Heart Study