A nonradioactive DNA methyltransferase assay adaptable to high-throughput screening.

Y. Woo,P. Rajagopalan,S. Benkovic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AB.2005.01.059

IF: 2.9

2005-05-15

Analytical Biochemistry

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Effect of exercise on red blood cell in march hemoglobinuria.

H. Joshua,A. De vries

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/AJCP/46.3.341

1966-09-01

American Journal of Clinical Pathology

Abstract:
Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Versus Quadriceps Tendon–Bone Autografts in Anatomic Rectangular Tunnel Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Kazunori Shimomura,Akira Tsujii,Ayaka Tanaka,Masayuki Hamada,Yasukazu Yonetani

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241297104

IF: 2.6

2024-11-28

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 11, November 2024. Background:Anatomic rectangular tunnel anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ART-ACLR) can mimic the fiber arrangement of the native ACL and restore normal knee biomechanics, compared with the conventional round tunnel ACLR. ART-ACLR using a bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) graft can provide satisfactory clinical outcomes; however, some issues such as secondary ACL injury and donor-site morbidity, including postoperative anterior knee pain (AKP), remain to be solved. Due to these issues, quadriceps tendon–bone (QTB) grafts have recently become more popular.Purpose:To compare the 2-year clinical outcomes of ART-ACLR with BPTB and QTB autografts.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 134 patients underwent primary ART-ACLR with BPTB (n = 70) or QTB (n = 64). All patients had a minimum follow-up period of 2 years postoperatively. Outcome evaluations included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), side-to-side differences (SSDs) with the KT-1000 knee arthrometer, rate of secondary ACL injury, and incidence of AKP.Results:Regarding age, sex, height, weight,and concomitant procedures, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. All clinical scores significantly improved from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively and further increased throughout the 2-year postoperative period in both groups. The IKDC and all subscales of the KOOS, except Sport and Recreation, were equivalent between the BPTB and QTB groups at each postoperative time point. There were no significant differences in the SSD value of KT-1000 arthrometer between the 2 groups. The rates of secondary ACL injury were 10.0% on the ipsilateral side and 2.9% on the contralateral side in the BPTB group and 3.1% on the ipsilateral side and 4.7% on the contralateral side in the QTB group, with no significant difference between both groups. The incidence of AKP was 17.1% and 4.9% in the BPTB group and QTB group, respectively, with significance of P = .02).Conclusion:The clinical scores, SSD value of the KT-1000 arthrometer, and secondary ACL injury rates were equivalent between the BPTB and QTB groups. However, the incidence of AKP was significantly lower in the QTB group, suggesting that QTB could be a favorable graft for ACLR.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Wenli Dai,Xi Leng,Jian Wang,Jin Cheng,Xiaoqing Hu,Yingfang Ao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211030259

2022-01-01

Abstract:Background: The best type of autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains debatable. Hypothesis: Compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts, the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has comparable graft survival as well as clinical function and pain outcomes. Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting comparisons of QT versus BPTB or HT autografts for ACL reconstruction were included. All analyses were stratified according to study design: RCTs or observational studies. Results: A total of 24 studies were included: 7 RCTs and 17 observational studies. The 7 RCTs included 388 patients, and the 17 observational studies included 19,196 patients. No significant differences in graft failure (P = .36), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score (P = .39), or the side-to-side difference in stability (P = .60) were noted between QT and BPTB autografts. However, a significant reduction in donor site morbidity was noted in the QT group compared with the BPTB group (risk ratio [RR], 0.17 [95% CI, 0.09-0.33]; P < .001). No significant differences in graft failure (P = .57), the IKDC subjective score (P = .25), or the side-to-side stability difference (P = .98) were noted between QT and HT autografts. However, the QT autograft was associated with a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity than the HT autograft (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.93]; P = .02). A similar graft failure rate between the QT and control groups was observed after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. However, a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity was observed in the QT group compared with the control group after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. No difference in effect estimates was seen between RCTs and observational studies. Conclusion: The QT autograft had comparable graft survival, functional outcomes, and stability outcomes compared with BPTB and HT autografts. However, donor site morbidity was significantly worse with the QT autograft than with BPTB and HT autografts.
Functional Outcomes of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Quadrupled Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Mohammed Inayathulla Khan,Inas Ismail,Savith Shetty,Jithin A Jebbar,Afra Faiaz,Shameez Mohammed,Abhishek V Shetty,Imthiaz Ahammed,Mohammed Shahid

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.66945

2024-08-15

Cureus

Abstract:Introduction Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) with autografts has been available for decades; however, the choice of graft is still debated. Here, we compared the functional outcomes of the two most widely used autografts, bone-patella tendon-bone (BPTB) and quadruple-stranded semitendinosus/gracilis (ST/G) autografts, at six months following ACLR. Materials and methods This prospective study was performed in the Department of Orthopedics of Yenepoya Medical College and Hospital located in Mangalore, Karnataka, India, a tertiary care institute over a period of 18 months (November 2018 to April 2020). The study included 38 adult patients who underwent ACLR and were randomly divided into two groups: BPTB autograft (n=19) or ST/G autograft (N=19). The patients were followed up at one-, three-, and six months. Postoperatively, surgical morbidity, knee stability functional outcome on Lysholm score, and knee range of motion (ROM) were assessed. Results The groups were homogenous and comparable regarding age, sex, side of ACL affected, duration of tear to treatment, and muscle wasting (all p-values > 0.05). At six months, the majority of the patients had a tibial translation of 0-2 mm on the Lachman test and anterior drawer test, and the groups did not differ significantly (both p-values > 0.05). Additionally, at six months, both groups demonstrated a significant increase in mean Lysholm score and mean ROM (both p-values < 0.001). However, the groups did not differ in mean Lysholm score and mean ROM at baseline and any of the follow-up visits (all p-values > 0.05). Conclusion At six months, ACLR with BPTB and ST/G autografts produced significant and comparable knee stability, functional outcome, and ROM.
Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Wenli Dai,Xi Leng,Jian Wang,Jin Cheng,Xiaoqing Hu,Yingfang Ao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465211030259

2021-01-01

Abstract:The best type of autograft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction remains debatable.Compared with bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and hamstring tendon (HT) autografts, the quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has comparable graft survival as well as clinical function and pain outcomes.Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4.A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library to July 2020. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies reporting comparisons of QT versus BPTB or HT autografts for ACL reconstruction were included. All analyses were stratified according to study design: RCTs or observational studies.A total of 24 studies were included: 7 RCTs and 17 observational studies. The 7 RCTs included 388 patients, and the 17 observational studies included 19,196 patients. No significant differences in graft failure (P = .36), the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score (P = .39), or the side-to-side difference in stability (P = .60) were noted between QT and BPTB autografts. However, a significant reduction in donor site morbidity was noted in the QT group compared with the BPTB group (risk ratio [RR], 0.17 [95% CI, 0.09-0.33]; P < .001). No significant differences in graft failure (P = .57), the IKDC subjective score (P = .25), or the side-to-side stability difference (P = .98) were noted between QT and HT autografts. However, the QT autograft was associated with a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity than the HT autograft (RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.39-0.93]; P = .02). A similar graft failure rate between the QT and control groups was observed after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. However, a significantly lower rate of donor site morbidity was observed in the QT group compared with the control group after both early and late full weightbearing, after early and late full range of motion, and after using the QT autograft with a bone plug and all soft tissue QT grafts. No difference in effect estimates was seen between RCTs and observational studies.The QT autograft had comparable graft survival, functional outcomes, and stability outcomes compared with BPTB and HT autografts. However, donor site morbidity was significantly lower with the QT autograft than with BPTB and HT autografts.
A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Quadriceps Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Jay R. Ebert,Nicholas D. Calvert,Ross Radic

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231222279

IF: 4.8

2024-01-30

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:Numerous graft options are available when undertaking anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR), although a lack of high-quality evidence exists comparing quadriceps (QT) and hamstring (HT) autografts.Purpose:To investigate patient outcomes in patients undergoing HT versus QT ACLR.Study Design:Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:After recruitment and randomization, 112 patients (HT = 55; QT = 57) underwent ACLR. Patients were assessed pre- and postoperatively (6 weeks and 3, 6, 12, and 24 months), with a range of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), graft laxity (KT-1000 arthrometer; primary outcome variable), active knee flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), peak isokinetic knee extensor and flexor strength, and a 6-hop performance battery. Limb symmetry indices (LSIs) were calculated for strength and hop measures. Secondary procedures, ACL retears, and contralateral ACL tears were reported.Results:All PROMs and knee ROM measures significantly improved (P .05) were observed—apart from the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) score, which was significantly better in the HT group at 3 (P = .008), 6 (P = .010), and 12 (P = .014) months. No significant changes were observed in side-to-side laxity from 6 to 24 months (P = .105), and no group differences were observed (P = .487) at 6 (HT mean, 1.2; QT mean, 1.3), 12 (HT mean, 1.1; QT mean, 1.3), and 24 (HT mean, 1.1; QT mean, 1.2) months. While the HT group demonstrated significantly greater (P < .05) quadriceps strength LSIs at 6 and 12 months, the QT group showed significantly greater (P < .05) hamstring strength LSIs at 6, 12, and 24 months. The HT group showed significantly greater (P < .05) LSIs for the single horizontal (6 months), lateral (6 and 12 months), and medial (6 months) hop tests for distance. Up until 24 months, 1 patient (QT at 22 months) had a retear, with 2 contralateral ACL tears (QT at 19 months; HT at 23 months). Secondary procedures included 5 in the HT group (manipulation under anesthesia, notch debridement, meniscal repair, and knee arthroscopy for scar tissue) and 6 in the QT group (notch debridement, meniscal repair, knee arthroscopy for scar tissue, tibial tubercle transfer, and osteochondral autologous transplantation).Conclusion:Apart from the ACL-RSI, the 2 autograft groups compared well for PROMs, knee ROM, and laxity. However, greater hamstring strength LSIs were observed for the QT cohort, with greater quadriceps strength (and hop test) LSIs in the HT cohort. The longer-term review will continue to evaluate return to sports and later-stage reinjury between the 2 graft constructs.Registration:ACTRN12618001520224p (Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry).

orthopedics,sport sciences
Sex-Specific Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft in a Young Active Population

Camryn B Petit,Harris S Slone,Jed A Diekfuss,Kim D Barber Foss,Shayla M Warren,Alicia M Montalvo,Joseph D Lamplot,Gregory D Myer,John W Xerogeanes

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465241262018

Abstract:Background: The ideal graft for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) in young athletes has a high return-to-sport (RTS) rate and a low reinjury rate. Quadriceps tendon autografts are being used with increasing frequency for ACLR in this population, despite a paucity of evidence to support their use. Purpose: To report the RTS rate, ipsilateral reinjury rate, and contralateral ACL injury rate in a young athletic population undergoing primary ACLR using an all-soft tissue quadriceps tendon (ASTQT) autograft. Study design: Cases series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients aged 14 to 22 years who underwent primary ACLR using an ASTQT autograft by a single surgeon between January 1, 2005, and April 30, 2020, were identified via electronic medical records and contacted ≥24 months after ACLR to complete a survey regarding subsequent ipsilateral or contralateral ACL injuries and RTS. Patients who had undergone previous ACLR (ipsilateral or contralateral) were excluded. Results: A total of 656 patients (330 male, 326 female; mean age, 17.9 years) were identified, and 395 patients completed the survey (60.2%; 174 male, 221 female; mean age, 17.8 years) with a mean follow-up of 73 ± 29 months (range, 24-139 months). The RTS rate was high (male: 87.7%; female: 82.8%; P = .19). Male and female patients had similar rates of revision ACLR (male: 12.6%; female: 10.0%; P = .40) and contralateral ACL injuries (male: 13.8%; female: 11.3%; P = .46). Conclusion: A high RTS rate and similar rates of ipsilateral and contralateral ACL injuries were found for male and female patients in a young athletic population undergoing primary ACLR using an ASTQT autograft. These results help one to better understand the utility of ASTQT grafts to support successful ACLR in young athletic populations, for which ASTQT grafts appear to yield favorable outcomes.
Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft

Kang Sun,Shao-qi Tian,Ji-hua Zhang,Chang-suo Xia,Cai-long Zhang,Teng-bo Yu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arthro.2008.12.023

Abstract:Purpose: The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcome of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft. Methods: Between May 2000 and June 2004, 172 patients undergoing arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone ACL reconstruction were prospectively randomized into autograft (n = 86) or allograft (n = 86) groups. The senior surgeon performed all operations using the same surgical technique. Each fixation was performed by means of an interference screw. Patients were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively at follow-up. Of the patients, 156 (76 in the autograft group and 80 in the allograft group) were available for full evaluation. Evaluations included a detailed history, physical examination, functional knee ligament testing, KT-2000 arthrometer testing (MEDmetric, San Diego, CA), Harner's vertical jump and Daniel's 1-leg hop tests, Lysholm score, Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee standard evaluation form, Cincinnati knee score, and radiograph. Results: Demographic data were comparable between groups. The mean follow-up was 5.6 years for both groups. There were no statistically significant differences according to evaluations of outcome between the 2 groups except that patients in the allograft group had a shorter operation time and longer fever time postoperatively compared with the autograft group. The postoperative infection rates were 0% and 1.25% for the autograft group and allograft group, respectively. There was a significant difference (P < .05) in the development of osteoarthritis between the operated knee in comparison to the contralateral knee according to radiographs. However, no significant difference was found between the 2 groups at the final follow-up examination (P > .05). Conclusions: Both groups of patients achieved almost the same satisfactory outcomes after a mean of 5.6 years of follow-up. Allograft is a reasonable alternative to autograft for ACL reconstruction. Level of evidence: Level II, prospective comparative study.
Anterior knee pain in the short term following ACL reconstruction comparing hamstring autograft and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft with refilling of harvest sites. A retrospective matched-pair analysis

Georg Brandl,Marija Ana Domej,Gerald Loho,Thomas Hoffelner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967120S00328

IF: 2.6

2020-05-31

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:With current trends towards individualized anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery, especially in younger patients performing high pivoting sports and patients with hyperlaxity, the bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft and its advantages in primary ACL reconstruction, have been brought into focus. Still concern remains about donor site morbidity, especially kneeling pain, due to bone block harvesting at the distal patella and tibial tuberosity. There is ongoing scientific effort to reduce this weakness of BPTB-harvesting techniques, without satisfying results so far. This study compares anterior knee pain (AKP) in patients receiving hamstring tendon (HS) and those patients treated with BPTB autograft ACL reconstruction, respectively. In the latter group harvest sites were refilled with autologous bone material from an oscillating hollow saw used to create the tibial tunnel. The aim of this study was, to compare both techniques that there is no significant difference in postoperative knee pain and kneeling pain in the early follow up period. Forty-two patients with primary ACL reconstruction (21 BPTB, group A; 21 HS, group B) were retrospectively analyzed obtaining matched pairs based on age (±5 years), length of follow up (18 ± 6 months) and gender.Preoperative radiological analysis of patellofemoral cartilage defects were recorded using MRI scans and arthroscopic images (modified Outerbridge grading). Additionally clinical and patient-reported outcome measures were obtained, assessing range-of-motion, knee-laxity (Lachman, anterior-drawer test), activities of daily living and sports activity scale (KOS-ADL and SAS score) and graft or contralateral ACL tear occurring during follow up. At short term follow up clinical parameters were similar between patients treated either with hamstring or BPTB autograft. Scores showed higher values for daily living (KOS-ADLS) in the short term in group A (P<0,05), in contrary group B showed higher scores for the KOS-SAS (P<0,05). More patients avoid kneeling on the operated knee after BPTB-autograft reconstruction, without impairing activities of daily living or sports participation. No significant difference existed between clinical stability measures or range of motion at follow up. Our study showed that ACL reconstruction with HS or BPTB autograft has successful short term outcome, with high probability of returning to unimpaired activities of daily living. This study shows that refilling of harvest sites with autologous bone material taken from an hollow saw used for creation of the tibial tunnel leads to acceptable donor site morbidity, without restriction in daily activities and sports participation, respectively. It can therefore be assumed that BPTB autograft without leaving bony defects at the harvest sites is a safe procedure with low donor site morbidity, being relevant in individualized ACL reconstruction.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Primary Versus Revision ACL Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Autograft: A Matched-Control Cohort Study

Amit Meena,Luca Farinelli,Christian Hoser,Elisabeth Abermann,Caroline Hepperger,Mohit Kumar Patralekh,Mirco Herbort,Christian Fink

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671231224501

IF: 2.6

2024-02-03

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 2, February 2024. Background:The incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is increasing, and quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft is gaining popularity for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction.Purpose:To evaluate the differences in the patient-reported functional outcomes, concomitant injuries, and graft failure in primary versus revision ACL surgery using QT autograft.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A total of 376 patients with primary ACL reconstruction and 138 patients with revision ACL reconstruction were retrospectively retrieved from a prospectively collected ACL registry. A minimally invasive technique was used for QT autograft harvesting. The surgical procedure and rehabilitation protocol were identical in both groups. To maintain a homogeneous cohort for the study, the groups were matched by age, sex, and preinjury outcome scores (Lysholm knee score, Tegner activity level, and visual analog scale [VAS] for pain). Initial baseline assessments of outcome scores were compared with scores collected at the 2-year postoperative mark.Results:The mean age of the primary group and revision group was 32.9 ± 10.2 years (range, 18-55 years) and 32.3 ± 9.9 years (range, 19-55 years) respectively. Significant preinjury to postoperative improvements were noted in Lysholm (88.2 ± 16.4 vs 83.5 ± 15.0; P = .007) and VAS pain (0.9 ± 1.3 vs 1.5 ± 1.6; P = .001) scores after primary ACL reconstruction compared with revision reconstruction. However, no significant difference was found in Tegner activity level (6.7 ± 1.8 vs 5.9 ± 1.8; P > .430). Primary ACL injury was associated with significantly higher concomitant medial collateral ligament injuries (P = .019), while the revision group was associated with significantly higher concomitant cartilage (P = .001) and meniscal (P = .003) injuries. A significantly higher graft failure rate was noted in the revision group compared with the primary ACL reconstruction group (13.0% vs 5.6%; P = .005).Conclusion:Both primary and revision ACL reconstruction with QT autograft had acceptable functional outcomes. The primary group had better outcomes than the revision group, possibly due to the lower prevalence of meniscal and cartilage injuries in the primary group compared with the revision group. The revision group was associated with higher graft failure than the primary group. QT autograft is a viable graft choice for both primary and revision ACL reconstruction.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Hunting for genes in essential tremor

E. Tan,E. Tan,A. Schapira

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-1331.2008.02226.x

2008-09-01

European Journal of Neurology

Abstract:Essential tremor (ET) is a common movement disorder in adults and the condition has also been reported in children [1,2]. In the vast majority of patients, a positive family history can frequently be elicited. Current evidence suggests that the inheritance of ET can be autosomal dominant or follow a complex inheritance pattern. Efforts to identify ET susceptibility loci have proved challenging. Thus far, linkage analysis studies in Icelandic and North American families have identified three genetic loci in chromosome 3q13 (ETM1) [3], 2p22-p25 (ETM2) [4] and 6p23 [5], where the causative ET genes may be located. As many families do not show evidence for linkage to any of these loci, multiple yet undiscovered ET genes probably exist. Like in other complex disorders, there have been attempts to unravel common genetic risk factors that might contribute to the etiology of apparent sporadic forms of ET [6–12]. Higgins et al. [9] described a putative mutation (A265G) in the HS1-BP3 gene that was found to associate with familial ET. However, the excitement for this observation abated when the variant was subsequently found in normal controls and could not be consistently replicated in patients [10]. More recently, a Ser9Gly variant in the DRD3 gene located in the ETM1 locus was demonstrated to associate with risk and age at onset of ET [11]. The variant also appears to co-segregate with ET in some families [12]. The DRD3 is of interest as it encodes the dopamine D3 receptor, a member of the D2 family of dopamine receptors. D3 receptors may be involved in the regulation of locomotion as DRD3 protein is expressed in the Purkinje cells of the rat cerebellum, which has been implicated in the pathogenesis of ET [11]. In vitro, DRD3 has been shown to mediate ERK activation and the functional Gly9 variant elevates dopamine affinity and dopamine-mediated cyclic-AMP response and prolongs the mitogen-associated protein kinase signal. Replication of a genetic association in independent populations is the litmus test of its validity. Two studies in this issue of EJN attempted to address the replicability involving the DRD3 variant. Vitale et al. [13] in a case control study in the Italian population did not find such an association in their familial ET patients. The authors also genotyped the variant in 76 affected and 20 non-affected subjects from 16 ET families. Co-segregation of the Gly-9 allele was suggested in only three families. However, the strength of this co-segregation is not clear as details were not provided. Inashkina et al. [14] analyzed short tandem repeat markers located within the ETM 1 and ETM2 loci, but no association of these markers with ET was detected in the Latvian population. Furthermore, they found no significant difference in the frequency of the DRD3 Ser9Gly variant between cases and controls. A similar study also did not detect the association in the Asian population [6]. Blair et al. [15] analyzed the association with this variant using linkage analysis, association study and transmission disequilibrium test in a much larger group of ET patients and controls and arrived at a similar conclusion. The failure by various groups to replicate the DRD3 association with ET is disappointing and suggests that the Ser9Gly variant is unlikely to play a major role in ET susceptibility in the majority of patients. However, it is timely to remind ourselves that findings from both hypothesis-generating and replication studies in ET genetic association studies are frequently influenced by various confounding variables. For most published studies, the sample size remains relatively small, the study populations vary (including a mix of familial and sporadic cases), family history is frequently unreliable with no validation [16], and clinical diagnostic criteria are variably applied. To compound these problems, there is significant clinical and genetic heterogeneity among ET patients, and incomplete penetrance is an important confounding factor in linkage analysis. Misdiagnosis can occur as ET can also be an initial presentation of other genetic disorders [17,18]. Several environmental factors have been postulated in ET pathogenesis, and the magnitude of the gene–environmental interaction in the common garden variety of ET is unclear. Because of all these reasons, cautious interpretation of genetic association studies in ET is advised. To surmount these problems, multiple approaches are needed to unravel causative genes of ET. Perhaps, one should focus on selected groups of ET patients who are genetically enriched. In ET families with clear Mendelian inheritance, a mapping–cloning strategy including parametric linkage analysis and candidate gene screening remains the norm. However, long-term follow-up and re-evaluation of the initial analysis of non-affected subjects will be important. In sporadic patients, validation of a link through comparative analysis of linkage disequilibrium and disease-association patterns in the very young onset patients may be potentially fruitful. These can be reinforced by studies involving sibpairs, monozygotic twins, and nuclear families. An understanding of the aetiopathogenesis of a disease and the role that inheritance can play can be an
Autograft Versus Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Craig R. Bottoni,Eric L. Smith,James Shaha,Steven S. Shaha,Sarah G. Raybin,John M. Tokish,Douglas J. Rowles

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546515596406

IF: 4.8

2015-08-26

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Background: The use of allografts for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in young athletes is controversial. No long-term results have been published comparing tibialis posterior allografts to hamstring autografts. Purpose: To evaluate the long-term results of primary ACL reconstruction using either an allograft or autograft. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: From June 2002 to August 2003, patients with a symptomatic ACL-deficient knee were randomized to receive either a hamstring autograft or tibialis posterior allograft. All allografts were from a single tissue bank, aseptically processed, and fresh-frozen without terminal irradiation. Graft fixation was identical in all knees. All patients followed the same postoperative rehabilitation protocol, which was blinded to the therapists. Preoperative and postoperative assessments were performed via examination and/or telephone and Internet-based questionnaire to ascertain the functional and subjective status using established knee metrics. The primary outcome measures were graft integrity, subjective knee stability, and functional status. Results: There were 99 patients (100 knees); 86 were men, and 95% were active-duty military. Both groups were similar in demographics and preoperative activity level. The mean and median ages of both groups were identical at 29 and 26 years, respectively. Concomitant meniscal and chondral pathologic abnormalities, microfracture, and meniscal repair performed at the time of reconstruction were similar in both groups. At a minimum of 10 years (range, 120-132 months) from surgery, 96 patients (97 knees) were contacted (2 patients were deceased, and 1 was unable to be located). There were 4 (8.3%) autograft and 13 (26.5%) allograft failures that required revision reconstruction. In the remaining patients whose graft was intact, there was no difference in the mean Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Tegner, or International Knee Documentation Committee scores. Conclusion: At a minimum of 10 years after ACL reconstruction in a young athletic population, over 80% of all grafts were intact and had maintained stability. However, those patients who had an allograft failed at a rate over 3 times higher than those with an autograft.

orthopedics,sport sciences
[Tuberculosis in the province of Mahajanga].

A. Ralison,N. Ralinoro,E. Rasoely,D. Rakotondramarina,O. Ratsirahonana

Abstract:Comparative study of compulsory declarations registered at the provincial level and at the central level between January 1st 1993 and 31st December 1994 showed a high prevalence of tuberculosis in the province of Mahajanga and an under-declaration of cases at the provincial level was almost 25% with regard to data collected at the central level. Smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis patients were the most frequent (86%), which showed respect towards the National Control Programme instructions. Extrapulmonary tuberculosis were under-estimated (less than 10%) because of the weak diagnosis means. Smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis under treatment in the city of Mahajanga were cured globally at 80%. The difference between the centres diminished between 1992 and 1993, then it persisted requiring the improvement of tubercular management conditions within the province structures and most particularly within the city of Mahajanga structures which are at the present taking charge of more than 50% of the province tubercular.
Hearing Loss as the Initial Presentation of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

P. Krishna,C. Bauer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/014556130408300812

2004-08-01

Abstract:Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease is a rare type of spongiform encephalopathy. Affected patients present with constitutional symptoms, which progress to severe mental deterioration and movement disorders. Dizziness is the most common early otologic symptom. Few reports in the literature describe patients with Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease who present with sudden-onset hearing loss as their primary symptom for seeking treatment. This paper discusses one such patient and reviews the clinical presentation, treatment options, and relevant literature.
A Retrospective Study of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patella Tendon:Allograft Versus Autograft

Xu Zhihong,Chen Dongyang,Jiang Qing,Sun Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-6710.2008.03.003

2008-01-01

Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament(ACL)reconstruction by using allograft and autograft of patella tendon.Methods From August 2003 to December 2005,82 ACL reconstruction patients were studied retrospectively,including 59 cases using autograft of patellar bone-tendon-bone(BPTB)and 23 cases using BPTB allograft.Physical examination,scores of IKDC,Lysholm-Tegner and VAS as well as KT-2000 measurements were used for evaluation pre-and post-operation.Results 41 autograft and 17 allograft patients were finally followed up.One allograft patient suffered re-rupture of the reconstructed ligament.Positive ADT test were found in 5 autograft and 1 allograft patients and positive Lachman test were found in 3 autograft and 1 allograft patients.No statistically significant differences were revealed in ROM.IKDC,Lysholm-Tegner Score and KT-2000 measurements showed no significant differences between two groups,but VAS for autograft group were significantly higher than allograft group(P<0.05).Conclusion ACL reconstruction with allograft and autograft achieved similar clinical outcomes.Allograft could be a reasonable choice for ACL reconstruction.
Outcomes of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction in an all-female soccer player cohort with mean 4.8-year follow up

Zachary J Herman,Neilen A Benvegnu,Sahil Dadoo,Audrey Chang,Robert Scherer,Ehab M Nazzal,Emre Anil Özbek,Janina Kaarre,Jonathan D Hughes,Bryson P Lesniak,Dharmesh Vyas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2023.11.002

Abstract:Objective: The purpose is to compare functional outcomes, return to soccer rates, and revision rates in an all-female soccer player cohort undergoing quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft ACLR versus bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft ACLR. Methods: Female soccer players who sustained an ACL rupture and underwent primary anatomic, single-bundle ACLR with BPTB autograft or QT autograft were included. Demographic and surgical characteristics were collected. Outcomes of interest included Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Marx score, return to soccer rates, and failure rates. Results: Data on 23 patients undergoing BPTB autograft ACLR and 14 undergoing QT autograft ACLR was available. Average age was 18.7 years, and average follow up was 4.8 years. Overall, 76 % (28/37) returned to soccer and 5.4 % (2/37) underwent revision ACLR. No major significant differences were found in demographic or surgical characteristics. No differences were found in postoperative IKDC scores, preoperative, postoperative, or change from pre-to postoperative Marx activity scores, or pre-and postoperative Tegner scores between the groups. QT autograft ACLR patients had significantly less change in Tegner scores pre-to postoperatively compared to the BTPB autograft ACLR group (0.6 ± 1.2 versus 2.1 ± 1.8; p = 0.02). Both groups had similar rates of return to soccer [78 % (18/23) BPTB autograft ACLR versus 71 % (10/14) QT autograft ACLR; p = 0.64] and rates of revision (8.7 % (2/23) BPTB autograft ACLR; 0 % (0/14) QT autograft ACLR. Conclusion: Results of this study suggest that BPTB autograft ACLR and QT autograft ACLR produce comparable, successful functional and return to soccer outcomes in this all-female soccer player cohort study. Larger, prospective studies are needed to improve the strength of conclusions and provide more information on the optimal graft choice for female soccer players. Surgeons can use the results of this study to counsel female soccer players on expected outcomes after ACLR. Level of evidence: III.
Risk of Revision and Reoperation After Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACL Reconstruction Compared With Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Autografts in a US Cohort of 21,973 Patients

Justin S. Yang,Heather A. Prentice,Chelsea E. Reyes,Christopher R. Lehman,Gregory B. Maletis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465231222267

IF: 4.8

2024-01-30

The American Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:The American Journal of Sports Medicine, Ahead of Print. Background:The use of quadriceps tendon (QT) autografts has increased in the past 10 years. However, there remains a dearth of large studies examining the effects of graft selection on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) that includes QT grafts.Purpose:To evaluate the risk of subsequent surgical outcomes, including revision and reoperation, for a large cohort of patients with primary ACLR according to autograft selection.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2.Methods:Data from a US health care system ACLR registry were used to conduct a cohort study. Primary isolated autograft ACLRs were identified (2012-2021). The exposure of interest was autograft type: QT, bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB), and hamstring tendon (HT). Multivariable Cox regression models were used to evaluate the risk of aseptic revision (defined as a subsequent surgery where removal and replacement of the original graft for noninfectious reasons was required) and risk of aseptic reoperation (defined as any subsequent surgery for noninfectious reasons where the graft was left intact) according to autograft selection.Results:The study sample comprised 21,973 ACLRs performed by 290 surgeons at 53 hospitals. QT, BPTB, and HT autografts were used in 1103 (5.0%), 9519 (43.3%), and 11,351 (51.7%) ACLRs, respectively. In adjusted models, no significant differences were observed in revision risk (hazard ratio [HR], 1.06; 95% CI, 0.60-1.89; P = .837) or reoperation risk (HR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.70-1.43; P = .993) within 4 years of follow-up when comparing QT ACLR with BPTB ACLR. Additionally, no differences in 4-year revision (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.34-1.12; P = .111) or reoperation (HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 0.85-1.80; P = .262) risks were observed when comparing QT ACLR with HT ACLR. HT ACLRs were noted to have a higher risk of revision (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.25-1.84; P < .001) compared with BPTB ACLRs but a lower risk of reoperation (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.75-0.98; P = .024).Conclusion:In this large multicenter study using data from an ACLR registry, the authors found no difference in the risk of revision or reoperation when QT was compared with BPTB or HT autograft with the numbers available, but they did find a 1.5 times higher risk of revision when HT autograft was compared with BPTB autograft. Surgeons may use this information when choosing the appropriate graft for ACLR in their patients.

orthopedics,sport sciences
Strength symmetry after autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Janina Kaarre,Zachary J Herman,Nicholas P Drain,Raghav Ramraj,Clair N Smith,Ehab M Nazzal,Jonathan D Hughes,Bryson P Lesniak,James J Irrgang,Volker Musahl,Andrew L Sprague

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jisako.2023.09.010

Abstract:Objective: To compare postoperative isometric quadriceps strength indices (QI%) and hamstring strength limb symmetry indices (HI%) between partial thickness quadriceps tendon (pQT), full thickness quadriceps tendon (fQT), and bone-patellar-tendon bone (BPTB) autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Methods: Patients with primary ACLR with pQT, fQT, or BPTB autograft with the documentation of quantitative postoperative strength assessments between 2016 and 2021 were included. Isometric Biodex data, including QI% and HI% (calculated as the percentage of involved to uninvolved limb strength) were collected between 5 and 8 months and between 9 and 15 months postoperatively. Results: In total, 124 and 51 patients had 5-8- and 9-15-month follow-up strength data, respectively. No significant difference was detected between groups for sex. However, patients undergoing fQT were found to be older than those undergoing BPTB (24.6±7 vs 20.2±5; p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in the number of concomitant meniscus repairs between the groups (pQT vs. fQT vs. BPTB). No significant differences were detected in median (min-max) QI% between pQT, fQT, and BPTB 5-8 months [87 % (44%-130 %), 84 % (44%-110 %), 82 % (37%-110 %) or 9-15 months [89 % (50%-110 %), 89 % (67%-110 %), and 90 % (74%-140 %)] postoperatively. Similarly, no differences were detected in median HI% between the groups 5-8 months or 9-15 months postoperatively. Conclusion: The study was unable to detect differences in the recovery of quadriceps strength between patients undergoing ACLR with pQT, fQT, and BPTB autografts at 5-8 months and 9-15-months postoperatively. Level of evidence: III.
Outcomes Comparison in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Between Hamstring Tendon and Quadriceps Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Randy,Khandar Yosua,Aswin Guntara,Demy Faheem Dasril

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967124s00430

IF: 2.6

2024-10-25

Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 10_suppl3, October 2024. Introduction and Objectives:Anterior cruciate ligaments (ACL) accounted for the most frequent ligamentous injury. ACL reconstruction (ACLR) when indicated, has been the standard of care to treat instability and to restore functional stability.While hamstring tendon autografts (HT) are commonly used in ACLR, quadriceps tendon autografts (QT) have gained popularity in recent years Thus, this study performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the outcomes of QT to HT for ACLR.Materials and Methods:Comprehensive database searches were performed in two databases, 452 studies were found and 14 studies were included in the study. This study was conducted based on the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Guideline. Included studies will be extracted for characteristics such as author, study year, design, and outcomes.Results:Fourteen studies were included in the study after a comprehensive literature search was done. 2219 patients, 847 were treated with QT and 1372 were treated with HT, functional outcomes such as International Knee Documentation Committee score (IKDC), Cincinnati score, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, Tegner score, VAS score, active knee flexion, return to previous activity, and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale(POSAS) were measured, there were differences in KOOS pain score and Symptom score with mean difference of 2.40 (95%CI 0.75 to 4.06, I2=26%, p=0.004), and 4.40 (95%CI 0.81 to 7.89, I2= 60%, p=0.02) respectively. However, there were no significant differences in other functional outcomes and secondary outcomes.Conclusion:This study demonstrates comparable results between ACLR using QT and HT. QT appeared to have better functional outcomes in KOOS pain and KOOS symptoms than in HT

orthopedics,sport sciences
Hamstring autografts demonstrate either similar or inferior outcomes to quadriceps or bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of comparative studies

Prushoth Vivekanantha,Harjind Kahlon,Zackariyah Hassan,David Slawaska‐Eng,Hassaan Abdel‐Khalik,Jansen Johnson,Darren de SA

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ksa.12366

2024-07-19

Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy

Abstract:Purpose To evaluate the clinical outcomes in patients undergoing revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (r‐ACLR) using hamstring tendon (HT) autografts with those using either quadriceps tendon (QT) or bone–patellar tendon–bone (BPTB) autografts or allografts. Methods Three databases were searched on 8 August 2023. The authors adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses (PRISMA) and Revised Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (R‐AMSTAR) guidelines and the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Data on demographics, surgical details, patient‐reported outcome measures (PROMs), rates of instability, failure and return to sport (RTS) were extracted. Results Eleven studies comprising 859 patients were included in this review. Five studies compared HT and QT autografts. One study each reported greater IKDC scores (p = 0.04) and Tegner scores (p = 0.04) in the QT group, while one study each reported higher anterior translation (p = 0.04), rates of positive pivot shift (p = 0.03) and rates of failure (p = 0.03) in the HT group. Six studies compared HT and BPTB autografts with one study each reporting greater Lysholm scores (p = 0.02) and less side‐to‐side anterior laxity (p

surgery,orthopedics,sport sciences

A nonradioactive DNA methyltransferase assay adaptable to high-throughput screening.

Effect of exercise on red blood cell in march hemoglobinuria.

Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone Versus Quadriceps Tendon–Bone Autografts in Anatomic Rectangular Tunnel Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Functional Outcomes of Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Versus Quadrupled Semitendinosus and Gracilis Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Quadriceps Tendon Autograft Versus Bone–Patellar Tendon–Bone and Hamstring Tendon Autografts for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Quadriceps Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Sex-Specific Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using an All-Soft Tissue Quadriceps Tendon Autograft in a Young Active Population

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft

Anterior knee pain in the short term following ACL reconstruction comparing hamstring autograft and bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft with refilling of harvest sites. A retrospective matched-pair analysis

Primary Versus Revision ACL Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Autograft: A Matched-Control Cohort Study

Hunting for genes in essential tremor

Autograft Versus Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

[Tuberculosis in the province of Mahajanga].

Hearing Loss as the Initial Presentation of Creutzfeldt-Jakob Disease

A Retrospective Study of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patella Tendon:Allograft Versus Autograft

Outcomes of bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft and quadriceps tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction in an all-female soccer player cohort with mean 4.8-year follow up

Risk of Revision and Reoperation After Quadriceps Tendon Autograft ACL Reconstruction Compared With Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Autografts in a US Cohort of 21,973 Patients

Strength symmetry after autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Outcomes Comparison in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Between Hamstring Tendon and Quadriceps Tendon Autograft: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Hamstring autografts demonstrate either similar or inferior outcomes to quadriceps or bone–patellar tendon–bone autografts in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review of comparative studies