Thematicity in Applied Linguistics Textbooks: A Comparative Study of Foreword, Introduction and Preface
A. Jalilifar,Ebtesam Abbasi Montazeri
2017-07-01
Abstract:A R T I C L E H I S T O R Y Content list available at www.urmia.ac.ir/ijltr Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 10.30466/ijltr.2017.20328 16 A. Jalilifar & E. Abbasi Montazeri/Thematicity in ... Introduction Over the last few decades, genre analysis has been used extensively, by ESP researchers, to investigate academic discourse (see Sorayyaei Azar, 2012). According to Swales (1990), genre refers to “a class of communicative events, the members of which share some set of communicative purposes” (p.58). One of the most widely researched genres, in the last thirty years, is what has become known as academic introductions. Just like the notion of genre, Bhatia (1997, 2004) considers introduction as a very versatile concept, the different manifestations of which could be placed at various levels of generalization. This being so, it is possible to assign a super genre status to introductions, which allows them to form a colony of closely related introductory genres. What helps identify these closely related genres is the shared communicative function (Swales, 1990) of “introducing an academic work”, e.g., introducing “an academic discipline, a book, a research article, a student essay or a lecture” (Bhatia, 1997, p.182). Bhatia (1997; 2004) argues that textbook introductions can be considered as a specific realization of academic introductions which perform the primary function of introducing academic textbooks. In the introductory pages of academic textbooks, there typically appear a number of introductory sections under different labels of introduction, preface, and foreword. It has been argued that while these introductory sections serve the common communicative purpose of introducing the book, some of them may occasionally fulfill some other minor purposes like promoting an academic event (Bhatia, 1997). More specifically, in the present-day practice, publishers tend to exploit introductory sections of books in order to promote their products. Therefore, it can be argued that book introductions fulfill an informative as well as a promotional function (Bhatia, 1997). According to functional theories of language, contextual differences “such as the communicative purpose of a given genre” manifest themselves in the linguistic choices exploited by language producers (Lavid, Arús & Moratón, 2012, p.5). Therefore, it is expected that the communicative purposes, performed by academic introductions, of either introducing or promoting an academic work could be partly achieved through the utilization of various linguistic resources, of which the theme-rheme construct is just one example (Lotfipour-Saedi, 2015). In systemic functional linguistics, theme is considered as one of the major systems in textual meta-function (Matthiessen & Halliday, 1997) and is defined by Halliday and Matthiessen (2004, p.64) as “the element which serves as the point of departure of the message; it is that which locates and orients the clause within its context”. They further argue that “the remainder of the message, the part in which the theme is developed is called in Prague school terminology the Rheme” (2004, p.64). Despite the fact that over the last few decades many studies have been devoted to exploring thematicity in different genres (e.g., Ebrahimi & Chan, 2013; Ghadessy, 1999; Jalilifar, 2009; Lorés, 2004; Martínez, 2003; North, 2003; Wang, 2007; Whittaker, 1995), very few studies have addressed this issue in the genre of academic textbooks. This paucity of research is most tangible in relation to the introductory genres of academic textbooks. Considering book prefaces for instance, Abdollahzadeh and Salarvand (2013) believe that there still exist many questions about their “generic structure, linguistic conventions, cross-disciplinary and cross-cultural differences and similarities” that need to be addressed (p.1619). Even in the domain of genre analytic studies of research papers, a review of the studies that have focused on identifying the move structure of academic papers reveals that in most of these studies move analysis is not combined with the investigation of their linguistic realizations (Doró, 2013). However, as argued by Pho (2008), move identification, which is conducted on the basis of content or function, could be supported by analyzing linguistic realizations as well. This implies that in order to lend support to the findings of studies that focus on investigating different genres in terms of their macro-structures, more studies need to be conducted on various linguistic features that realize those macrostructures. To contribute to the existing body of research in the area of themaicity and genre analysis, the present study aimed to fill the aforesaid hiatus in the literature by analyzing thematic Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research 5(2), (July, 2017) 15-35 17 organization in three main genre variations (foreword, introduction, and preface) of academic textbook introductions published in the field of applied linguistics. To this aim, the current research aims to address the following questions: 1. What thematic structures characterize the introductory sections (foreword, introduction, and preface) of applied linguistics textbooks? 2. What patterns of thematic progression characterize these sections? 3. Assuming that the overall generic structure of the introductory genres is similar, can this similarity also be attributed to their internal structure in terms of thematicity?