Nocturnal intermittent hemodialysis

J. Thumfart,D. Müller

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-014-2869-5

2015-05-01

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Self-configuring feedback loops for sensorimotor control

Sergio Verduzco-Flores,Erik De Schutter

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.07778

2022-10-21

Abstract:How dynamic interactions between nervous system regions in mammals performs online motor control remains an unsolved problem. In this paper we show that feedback control is a simple, yet powerful way to understand the neural dynamics of sensorimotor control. We make our case using a minimal model comprising spinal cord, sensory and motor cortex, coupled by long connections that are plastic. It succeeds in learning how to perform reaching movements of a planar arm with 6 muscles in several directions from scratch. The model satisfies biological plausibility constraints, like neural implementation, transmission delays, local synaptic learning and continuous online learning. Using differential Hebbian plasticity the model can go from motor babbling to reaching arbitrary targets in less than 10 minutes of in silico time. Moreover, independently of the learning mechanism, properly configured feedback control has many emergent properties: neural populations in motor cortex show directional tuning and oscillatory dynamics, the spinal cord creates convergent force fields that add linearly, and movements are ataxic (as in a motor system without a cerebellum).

Neurons and Cognition
Internal Dynamics Interact with Proprioceptive Feedback During Movement Execution in an RNN Model of Motor Cortex

Hongru Jiang,Xiangdong Bu,Zhiyan Zheng,Xiaochuan Pan,Yao Chen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.12.05.570033

2024-06-07

Abstract:Proprioceptive feedback provides the information about the state of the body, which is critical in motor control. However, the contribution of proprioceptive feedback to motor cortical activity during voluntary movement execution is unclear. Here, we built an recurrent neural network model of motor cortex that receives proprioceptive feedback, and optimized it to control a virtual arm to perform a delayed-reach task. Simulated neural activity is similar to real data, indicating that our model captures the motor cortical dynamics. We further disrupted recurrent connectivity and proprioceptive feedback to dissect their contribution, and found that internal dynamics dominate in neural population activity, while proprioceptive feedback controls movement termination. Moreover, proprioceptive feedback improves the network's robustness against noisy initial conditions. We further investigated the relative importance of the components in proprioceptive feedback and found that the feedback of hand velocity contributes most to the similarity between simulation and real data. Finally, we show that our motor cortex model can be implemented in the sensorimotor system, demonstrating our model's biological plausibility. In summary, motor command may arise from the intersection between recurrent dynamics in motor cortex and proprioceptive feedback.

Neuroscience
Internal Feedback in Biological Control: Locality and System Level Synthesis

Jing Shuang Li

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.11757

2022-04-06

Abstract:The presence of internal feedback pathways (IFPs) is a prevalent yet unexplained phenomenon in the brain. Motivated by experimental observations on 1) motor-related signals in visual areas, and 2) massively distributed processing in the brain, we approach this problem from a sensorimotor standpoint and make use of distributed optimal controllers to explain IFPs. We use the System Level Synthesis (SLS) controller to model neural phenomena such as signaling delay, local processing, and local reaction. Based on the SLS controller, we make qualitative predictions about IFPs that strongly align with existing experimental observations. We introduce a `mesocircuit' for optimal performance with distributed and local processing, and local disturbance rejection; this mesocircuit requires extreme amounts of IFPs and memory for proper function. This is the first theory that replicates the massive amounts of IFPs in the brain purely from a priori principles, providing a new theoretical basis upon which we can build to better understand the inner workings of the brain.

Systems and Control,Neurons and Cognition
Feedback control of recurrent dynamics constrains learning timescales during motor adaptation

Harsha Gurnani,Weixuan Liu,Bingni Wen Brunton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.24.595772

2024-06-26

Abstract:Latent dynamical models of the primary motor cortex (M1) have revealed fundamental neural computations underlying motor control; however, such models often overlook the impact of sensory feedback, which can continually update cortical dynamics and correct for external perturbations. This suggests a critical need to model the interaction between sensory feedback and intrinsic dynamics. Such models would also benefit the design of brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) that decode neural activity in real time, where both user learning and proficient control require feedback. Here we investigate the flexible feedback modulation of cortical dynamics and demonstrate its impact on BCI task performance and short-term learning. By training recurrent network models with real-time sensory feedback on a simple 2D reaching task, analogous to BCI cursor control, we show how previously reported M1 activity patterns can be reinterpreted as arising from feedback-driven dynamics. Next, by incorporating adaptive controllers upstream of M1, we make a testable prediction that short-term learning for a new BCI decoder is facilitated by plasticity of inputs to M1, including remapping of sensory feedback, beyond the plasticity of recurrent connections within M1. This input-driven dynamical structure also determines the speed of adaptation and learning outcomes, and explains a continuous form of learning variability. Thus, our work highlights the need to model input-dependent latent dynamics for motor control and clarifies how constraints on learning arise from both the statistical characteristics and the underlying dynamical structure of neural activity.

Neuroscience
Information And Control: Insights from within the brain

Birgitta Dresp-Langley

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2206.04400

IF: 3.7

2022-06-09

Robotics

Abstract:The neural networks of the brain are capable of learning statistical input regularities on the basis of synaptic learning, functional integration into increasingly larger, interconnected neural assemblies, and self organization. This self organizing ability has implications for biologically inspired control structures in robotics. On the basis of signal input from vision, sound, smell, touch and proprioception, multisensory representations for action are generated on the basis of physically specified input from the environment. The somatosensory cortex is a brain hub that delivers a choice example of integration for multifunctional representation and control. All sensory information is in a first instance topologically represented in the biological brain, and thereafter integrated in somatosensory neural networks for multimodal and multifunctional control of complex behaviors. Multisignal input triggers interactions between visual, auditory, tactile, olfactive, and proprioceptive mechanisms, which cooperate or compete during learning, and contribute to the formation of integrated representations for action, reflection, and communication between the agent and the outside world. Interaction fuels complex behavioral strategy deployment and further learning for increasingly coherent representation of intrinsically ambiguous physical environments.
Parallel feedback processing for voluntary control: knowledge of spinal feedback in motor cortex

Hui Guang,Joseph Y Nashed,J. Andrew Pruszynski,Hari Teja Kalidindi,Frederic Crevecoeur,Kevin P Cross,Gunnar Blohm,Stephen H Scott

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.05.12.593756

2024-05-14

Abstract:How hierarchical feedback pathways coordinate goal-directed motor corrections remains unknown. We show that systematic increases in spinal reflex responses to applied loads lead to a reciprocal reduction in the neural response in primary motor cortex. We use a neural network model to highlight how knowledge on lower-level feedback processing (i.e. spinal reflexes) can be embedded into a network to generate goal-directed corrections through parallel feedback pathways.

Neuroscience
Internal Feedback in Biological Control: Diversity, Delays, and Standard Theory

Josefin Stenberg,Jing Shuang Li,Anish A. Sarma,John C. Doyle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2109.11752

2022-04-06

Abstract:Neural architectures in organisms support efficient and robust control that is beyond the capability of engineered architectures. Unraveling the function of such architectures is challenging; their components are highly diverse and heterogeneous in their morphology, physiology, and biochemistry, and often obey severe speed-accuracy tradeoffs; they also contain many cryptic internal feedback pathways (IFPs). We claim that IFPs are crucial architectural features that strategically combine highly diverse components to give rise to optimal performance. We demonstrate this in a case study, and additionally describe how sensing and actuation delays in standard control (state feedback, full control, output feedback) give rise to independent and separable sources of IFPs. Our case study is an LQR problem with two types of sensors, one fast but sparse and one dense but slow. Controllers using only one type of sensor perform poorly, often failing even to stabilize; controllers using both types of sensors perform extremely well, demonstrating a strong diversity-enabled sweet spot (DESS). We demonstrate that IFPs are key in enabling this DESS, and additionally that with IFPs removed, controllers with delayed sensing perform poorly. The existence of strong DESS and IFP in this simple example suggest that these are fundamental architectural features in any complex system with diverse components, such as organisms and cyberphysical systems.

Systems and Control,Neurons and Cognition
Brain State Control by Closed-Loop Environmental Feedback

Christopher L. Buckley,Satohiro Tajima,Toru Yanagawa,Kana Takakura,Yasuo Nagasaka,Naotaka Fujii,Taro Toyoizumi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1602.08881

2016-02-29

Neurons and Cognition

Abstract:Brain state regulates sensory processing and motor control for adaptive behavior. Internal mechanisms of brain state control are well studied, but the role of external modulation from the environment is not well understood. Here, we examined the role of closed-loop environmental (CLE) feedback, in comparison to open-loop sensory input, on brain state and behavior in diverse vertebrate systems. In fictively swimming zebrafish, CLE feedback for optomotor stability controlled brain state by reducing coherent neuronal activity. The role of CLE feedback in brain state was also shown in a model of rodent active whisking, where brief interruptions in this feedback enhanced signal-to-noise ratio for detecting touch. Finally, in monkey visual fixation, artificial CLE feedback suppressed stimulus-specific neuronal activity and improved behavioral performance. Our findings show that the environment mediates continuous closed-loop feedback that controls neuronal gain, regulating brain state, and that brain function is an emergent property of brain-environment interactions.
Cortico-cortical feedback engages active dendrites in visual cortex

Mehmet Fişek,Dustin Herrmann,Alexander Egea-Weiss,Matilda Cloves,Lisa Bauer,Tai-Ying Lee,Lloyd E. Russell,Michael Häusser

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06007-6

IF: 64.8

2023-05-03

Nature

Abstract:Sensory processing in the neocortex requires both feedforward and feedback information flow between cortical areas1. In feedback processing, higher-level representations provide contextual information to lower levels, and facilitate perceptual functions such as contour integration and figure–ground segmentation2,3. However, we have limited understanding of the circuit and cellular mechanisms that mediate feedback influence. Here we use long-range all-optical connectivity mapping in mice to show that feedback influence from the lateromedial higher visual area (LM) to the primary visual cortex (V1) is spatially organized. When the source and target of feedback represent the same area of visual space, feedback is relatively suppressive. By contrast, when the source is offset from the target in visual space, feedback is relatively facilitating. Two-photon calcium imaging data show that this facilitating feedback is nonlinearly integrated in the apical tuft dendrites of V1 pyramidal neurons: retinotopically offset (surround) visual stimuli drive local dendritic calcium signals indicative of regenerative events, and two-photon optogenetic activation of LM neurons projecting to identified feedback-recipient spines in V1 can drive similar branch-specific local calcium signals. Our results show how neocortical feedback connectivity and nonlinear dendritic integration can together form a substrate to support both predictive and cooperative contextual interactions.

multidisciplinary sciences
World Statistics Drive Learning of Cerebellar Internal Models in Adaptive Feedback Control: A Case Study Using the Optokinetic Reflex

Sean R. Anderson,John Porrill,Paul Dean

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2020.00011

2020-03-25

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Abstract:The cerebellum is widely implicated in having an important role in adaptive motor control. Many of the computational studies on cerebellar motor control to date have focused on the associated architecture and learning algorithms in an effort to further understand cerebellar function. In this paper we switch focus to the signals driving cerebellar adaptation that arise through different motor behavior. To do this, we investigate computationally the contribution of the cerebellum to the optokinetic reflex (OKR), a visual feedback control scheme for image stabilization. We develop a computational model of the adaptation of the cerebellar response to the world velocity signals that excite the OKR (where world velocity signals are used to emulate head velocity signals when studying the OKR in head-fixed experimental laboratory conditions). The results show that the filter learnt by the cerebellar model is highly dependent on the power spectrum of the colored noise world velocity excitation signal. Thus, the key finding here is that the cerebellar filter is determined by the statistics of the OKR excitation signal.

neurosciences
Model-Free Robust Optimal Feedback Mechanisms of Biological Motor Control

Tao Bian,Daniel M. Wolpert,Zhong-Ping Jiang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/neco_a_01260

IF: 3.278

2020-03-01

Neural Computation

Abstract:Sensorimotor tasks that humans perform are often affected by different sources of uncertainty. Nevertheless, the central nervous system (CNS) can gracefully coordinate our movements. Most learning frameworks rely on the internal model principle, which requires a precise internal representation in the CNS to predict the outcomes of our motor commands. However, learning a perfect internal model in a complex environment over a short period of time is a nontrivial problem. Indeed, achieving proficient motor skills may require years of training for some difficult tasks. Internal models alone may not be adequate to explain the motor adaptation behavior during the early phase of learning. Recent studies investigating the active regulation of motor variability, the presence of suboptimal inference, and model-free learning have challenged some of the traditional viewpoints on the sensorimotor learning mechanism. As a result, it may be necessary to develop a computational framework that can account for these new phenomena. Here, we develop a novel theory of motor learning, based on model-free adaptive optimal control, which can bypass some of the difficulties in existing theories. This new theory is based on our recently developed adaptive dynamic programming (ADP) and robust ADP (RADP) methods and is especially useful for accounting for motor learning behavior when an internal model is inaccurate or unavailable. Our preliminary computational results are in line with experimental observations reported in the literature and can account for some phenomena that are inexplicable using existing models.

computer science, artificial intelligence,neurosciences
The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review

Hirokazu Tanaka,Takahiro Ishikawa,Jongho Lee,Shinji Kakei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2020.00019

2020-04-09

Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience

Abstract:This review surveys physiological, behavioral, and morphological evidence converging to the view of the cerebro-cerebellum as loci of internal forward models. The cerebro-cerebellum, the phylogenetically newest expansion in the cerebellum, receives convergent inputs from cortical, subcortical, and spinal sources, and is thought to perform the predictive computation for both motor control, motor learning, and cognitive functions. This predictive computation is known as an internal forward model. First, we elucidate the theoretical foundations of an internal forward model and its role in motor control and motor learning within the framework of the optimal feedback control model. Then, we discuss a neural mechanism that generates various patterns of outputs from the cerebro-cerebellum. Three lines of supporting evidence for the internal-forward-model hypothesis are presented in detail. First, we provide physiological evidence that the cerebellar outputs (activities of dentate nucleus cells) are predictive for the cerebellar inputs [activities of mossy fibers (MFs)]. Second, we provide behavioral evidence that a component of movement kinematics is predictive for target motion in control subjects but lags behind a target motion in patients with cerebellar ataxia. Third, we provide morphological evidence that the cerebellar cortex and the dentate nucleus receive separate MF projections, a prerequisite for optimal estimation. Finally, we speculate that the predictive computation in the cerebro-cerebellum could be deployed to not only motor control but also to non-motor, cognitive functions. This review concludes that the predictive computation of the internal forward model is the unifying algorithmic principle for understanding diverse functions played by the cerebro-cerebellum.

neurosciences
Regimen-related acute toxicities: pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical evaluation and preventive strategies.

Klingemann Hg,J. Shepherd,D. Reece,Barnett Mj,S. Nantel,H. Sutherland,J. Spinelli,G. Phillips

Bone Marrow Transplantation

Abstract:
The functional organization of cortical feedback inputs to primary visual cortex

Tiago Marques,Julia Nguyen,Gabriela Fioreze,Leopoldo Petreanu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41593-018-0135-z

IF: 25

2018-04-16

Nature Neuroscience

Abstract:Cortical feedback is thought to mediate cognitive processes like attention, prediction, and awareness. Understanding its function requires identifying the organizational logic of feedback axons relaying different signals. We measured retinotopic specificity in inputs from the lateromedial visual area in mouse primary visual cortex (V1) by mapping receptive fields in feedback boutons and relating them to those of neurons in their vicinity. Lateromedial visual area inputs in layer 1 targeted, on average, retinotopically matched locations in V1, but many of them relayed distal visual information. Orientation-selective axons overspread around the retinotopically matched location perpendicularly to their preferred orientation. Direction-selective axons were biased to visual areas shifted from the retinotopically matched position along the angle of their antipreferred direction. Our results show that feedback inputs show tuning-dependent retinotopic specificity. By targeting locations that would be activated by stimuli orthogonal to or opposite to a cell’s own tuning, feedback could potentially enhance visual representations in time and space.

neurosciences
Internal models in sensorimotor integration: perspectives from adaptive control theory

Chung Tin,Chi-Sang Poon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1741-2560/2/3/S01

Abstract:Internal models and adaptive controls are empirical and mathematical paradigms that have evolved separately to describe learning control processes in brain systems and engineering systems, respectively. This paper presents a comprehensive appraisal of the correlation between these paradigms with a view to forging a unified theoretical framework that may benefit both disciplines. It is suggested that the classic equilibrium-point theory of impedance control of arm movement is analogous to continuous gain-scheduling or high-gain adaptive control within or across movement trials, respectively, and that the recently proposed inverse internal model is akin to adaptive sliding control originally for robotic manipulator applications. Modular internal models' architecture for multiple motor tasks is a form of multi-model adaptive control. Stochastic methods, such as generalized predictive control, reinforcement learning, Bayesian learning and Hebbian feedback covariance learning, are reviewed and their possible relevance to motor control is discussed. Possible applicability of a Luenberger observer and an extended Kalman filter to state estimation problems-such as sensorimotor prediction or the resolution of vestibular sensory ambiguity-is also discussed. The important role played by vestibular system identification in postural control suggests an indirect adaptive control scheme whereby system states or parameters are explicitly estimated prior to the implementation of control. This interdisciplinary framework should facilitate the experimental elucidation of the mechanisms of internal models in sensorimotor systems and the reverse engineering of such neural mechanisms into novel brain-inspired adaptive control paradigms in future.
Neuromimetic Control -- A Linear Model Paradigm

John Baillieul,Zexin Sun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2104.12926

2021-10-09

Abstract:Stylized models of the neurodynamics that underpin sensory motor control in animals are proposed and studied. The voluntary motions of animals are typically initiated by high level intentions created in the primary cortex through a combination of perceptions of the current state of the environment along with memories of past reactions to similar states. Muscle movements are produced as a result of neural processes in which the parallel activity of large multiplicities of neurons generate signals that collectively lead to desired actions. Essential to coordinated muscle movement are intentionality, prediction, regions of the cortex dealing with misperceptions of sensory cues, and a significant level of resilience with respect to disruptions in the neural pathways through which signals must propagate. While linear models of feedback control systems have been well studied over decades, this paper proposes and analyzes a class of models whose aims are to capture some of the essential features of neural control of movement. Whereas most linear models of feedback systems entail a state component whose dimension is higher than the number of inputs or outputs, the work that follows will treat models in which the numbers of input and output channels greatly exceed the state dimension. While we begin by considering continuous time systems, the aim will be to treat systems whose evolution involves classes of inputs that emulate neural spike trains. Within the proposed class of models, the paper will study resilience to channel dropouts, the ways in which noise and uncertainty can be mitigated by an appropriate notion of consensus among noisy inputs, and finally, by a simple model in which binary activations of a multiplicity of input channels produce a dynamic response that closely approximates the dynamics of a prescribed linear system whose inputs are continuous functions of time.

Systems and Control
Learning within a sensory-motor circuit links action to expected outcome

WenXi Zhou,David M. Schneider

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.02.08.579532

2024-02-09

Abstract:The cortex integrates sound- and movement-related signals to predict the acoustic consequences of behavior and detect violations from expectations. Although expectation- and prediction-related activity has been observed in the auditory cortex of humans, monkeys, and mice during vocal and non-vocal acoustic behaviors, the specific cortical circuitry required for forming memories, recalling expectations, and making predictions remains unknown. By combining closed-loop behavior, electrophysiological recordings, longitudinal pharmacology, and targeted optogenetic circuit activation, we identify a cortical locus for the emergence of expectation and error signals. Movement-related expectation signals and sound-related error signals emerge in parallel in the auditory cortex and are concentrated in largely distinct neurons, consistent with a compartmentalization of different prediction-related computations. On a trial-by-trial basis, expectation and error signals are correlated in auditory cortex, consistent with a local circuit implementation of an internal model. Silencing the auditory cortex during motor-sensory learning prevents the emergence of expectation signals and error signals, revealing the auditory cortex as a necessary node for learning to make predictions. Prediction-like signals can be experimentally induced in the auditory cortex, even in the absence of behavioral experience, by pairing optogenetic motor cortical activation with sound playback, indicating that cortical circuits are sufficient for movement-like predictive processing. Finally, motor-sensory experience realigns the manifold dimensions in which auditory cortical populations encode movement and sound, consistent with predictive processing. These findings show that prediction-related signals reshape auditory cortex dynamics during behavior and reveal a cortical locus for the emergence of expectation and error.

Neuroscience
Reward-driven adaptation of movements requires strong recurrent basal ganglia-cortical loops

Arthur Leblois,Thomas Boraud,David Hansel

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.10.15.618421

2024-10-16

Abstract:The basal ganglia (BG), a set of subcortical nuclei involved in motor control, sensorimotor integration, and procedural learning, modulate movement through tonic inhibition of thalamo-cortical networks. While essential for sensorimotor integration and learning, the BG are not necessary for executing well-learned movements. During skill learning, they guide behavioral corrections via dopamine-dependent cortico-striatal plasticity, but these corrections become BG-independent as modifications occur in the motor cortex. Existing models of BG function often overlook the feedback dynamics of cortico-BG-thalamo-cortical loops, and do not address the relative role of cortex and the BG in the generation and adaptation of movement. In this work, we develop a theoretical model of this multiregional network, integrating anatomical, physiological, and behavioral evidence to explore how its dynamics shape movement execution and reward-based adaptation. We show that the BG-thalamo-cortical network influences motor output through three key factors: (i) the rich dynamics of its closed-loop architecture, (ii) attractor dynamics from recurrent cortical connections, and (iii) classical reinforcement learning via dopamine-dependent cortico-striatal plasticity. Our study highlights that efficient visuomotor adaptation requires strong feedback from the BG to the cortex. Finally, we propose a mechanism for initial movement learning through motor babbling. This model suggests the BG-cortical network shapes motor output through its intricate closed-loop dynamics and cortico-striatal dopamine-dependent plasticity.

Neuroscience
Modulation of sensory prediction error in Purkinje cells during visual feedback manipulations

Martha L. Streng,Laurentiu S. Popa,Timothy J. Ebner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03541-0

IF: 16.6

2018-03-15

Nature Communications

Abstract:It is hypothesized that the cerebellum implements a forward internal model that transforms motor commands into predictions about upcoming movements. The predictions are compared with sensory feedback to generate sensory prediction errors critical to controlling movements. The simple spike firing of cerebellar Purkinje cells both lead and lag movement consistent with representations of motor predictions and sensory feedback. This study tests whether this leading and lagging modulation provides the prediction and sensory feedback necessary to compute sensory prediction errors. Two manipulations of the visual feedback are used in rhesus monkeys performing pseudo-random tracking. Consistent with a forward model, delaying the visual feedback demonstrates that the leading simple spike modulation with position error is time-locked to the hand movement. Reducing the feedback shows that the lagged modulation is directly driven by visual inputs. Therefore, Purkinje cell discharge carries both the motor predictions and sensory feedback required of a forward internal model.

multidisciplinary sciences
Brief temporal perturbations in somatosensory reafference disrupt perceptual and neural attenuation and increase supplementary motor area–cerebellar connectivity

Konstantina Kilteni,Christian Houborg,H. Henrik Ehrsson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.1743-22.2023

2023-06-20

Abstract:Intrinsic delays in sensory feedback can be detrimental for motor control. As a compensation strategy, the brain predicts the sensory consequences of movement via a forward model on the basis of a copy of the motor command. Using these predictions, the brain attenuates somatosensory reafference to facilitate the processing of exafferent information. Theoretically, this predictive attenuation is disrupted by (even minimal) temporal errors between the predicted and actual reafference; however, direct evidence of such disruption is lacking since previous neuroimaging studies contrasted nondelayed reafferent input with exafferent input. Here, we combined psychophysics with functional magnetic resonance imaging to test whether subtle perturbations in the timing of somatosensory reafference disrupt its predictive processing. Twenty-eight participants (14 women) generated touches on their left index finger by tapping a sensor with their right index finger. The touches on the left index finger were delivered close to the time of the two fingers’ contact or with a temporal perturbation ( i.e. , 153 ms delay). We found that such a brief temporal perturbation disrupted the attenuation of the somatosensory reafference at both the perceptual and neural levels, leading to greater somatosensory and cerebellar responses and weaker somatosensory connectivity with the cerebellum, proportional to the perceptual changes. We interpret these effects as the failure of the forward model to predictively attenuate the perturbed somatosensory reafference. Moreover, we observed increased connectivity of the supplementary motor area with the cerebellum during the perturbations, which could indicate the return of the temporal prediction error to the motor centers. Significance statement Our brain receives somatosensory feedback from our movements with a delay. To counteract these delays, motor control theories postulate that the brain predicts the timing of somatosensory consequences of our movements and attenuates sensations received at that time. Thus, a self-generated touch feels weaker than an identical external touch. However, how subtle temporal errors between the predicted and actual somatosensory feedback perturb this predictive attenuation remains unknown. We show that such errors make the otherwise attenuated touch feel stronger, elicit stronger somatosensory responses, weaken cerebellar connectivity with somatosensory areas, and increase this connectivity with motor areas. These findings show that motor and cerebellar areas are fundamental in forming temporal predictions about the sensory consequences of our movements.

neurosciences

Nocturnal intermittent hemodialysis

Self-configuring feedback loops for sensorimotor control

Internal Dynamics Interact with Proprioceptive Feedback During Movement Execution in an RNN Model of Motor Cortex

Internal Feedback in Biological Control: Locality and System Level Synthesis

Feedback control of recurrent dynamics constrains learning timescales during motor adaptation

Information And Control: Insights from within the brain

Parallel feedback processing for voluntary control: knowledge of spinal feedback in motor cortex

Internal Feedback in Biological Control: Diversity, Delays, and Standard Theory

Brain State Control by Closed-Loop Environmental Feedback

Cortico-cortical feedback engages active dendrites in visual cortex

World Statistics Drive Learning of Cerebellar Internal Models in Adaptive Feedback Control: A Case Study Using the Optokinetic Reflex

Model-Free Robust Optimal Feedback Mechanisms of Biological Motor Control

The Cerebro-Cerebellum as a Locus of Forward Model: A Review

Regimen-related acute toxicities: pathophysiology, risk factors, clinical evaluation and preventive strategies.

The functional organization of cortical feedback inputs to primary visual cortex

Internal models in sensorimotor integration: perspectives from adaptive control theory

Neuromimetic Control -- A Linear Model Paradigm

Learning within a sensory-motor circuit links action to expected outcome

Reward-driven adaptation of movements requires strong recurrent basal ganglia-cortical loops

Modulation of sensory prediction error in Purkinje cells during visual feedback manipulations

Brief temporal perturbations in somatosensory reafference disrupt perceptual and neural attenuation and increase supplementary motor area–cerebellar connectivity