Abstract:BACKGROUND:Many randomized controlled trials have been performed with the goal of improving outcomes related to hemodialysis vascular access. If the reported outcomes are relevant and measured consistently to allow comparison of interventions across trials, such trials can inform decision making. This study aimed to assess the scope and consistency of vascular access outcomes reported in contemporary hemodialysis trials.STUDY DESIGN:Systematic review.SETTING & POPULATION:Adults requiring maintenance hemodialysis.SELECTION CRITERIA:All randomized controlled trials and trial protocols reporting vascular access outcomes identified from ClinicalTrials.gov, Embase, MEDLINE, and the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialized Register from January 2011 to June 2016.INTERVENTIONS:Any hemodialysis-related intervention.OUTCOMES:The frequency and characteristics of vascular access outcome measures were analyzed and classified.RESULTS:From 168 relevant trials, 1,426 access-related outcome measures were extracted and classified into 23 different outcomes. The 3 most common outcomes were function (136 [81%] trials), infection (63 [38%]), and maturation (31 [18%]). Function was measured in 489 different ways, but most frequently reported as "mean access blood flow (mL/min)" (37 [27%] trials) and "number of thromboses" (30 [22%]). Infection was assessed in 136 different ways, with "number of access-related infections" being the most common measure. Maturation was assessed in 44 different ways at 15 different time points and most commonly characterized by vein diameter and blood flow. Patient-reported outcomes, including pain (19 [11%]) and quality of life (5 [3%]), were reported infrequently. Only a minority of trials used previously standardized outcome definitions.LIMITATIONS:Restricted sampling frame for feasibility and focus on contemporary trials.CONCLUSIONS:The reporting of access outcomes in hemodialysis trials is very heterogeneous, with limited patient-reported outcomes and infrequent use of standardized outcome measures. Efforts to standardize outcome reporting for vascular access are critical to optimizing the comparability, reliability, and value of trial evidence to improve outcomes for patients requiring hemodialysis.

Compliance with good practice guidelines for the prevention of vascular access infections: the multi-centre PHYDEL survey in French haemodialysis units

Best practice in the use of peripheral venous catheters: A consensus from French experts

Vascular access-related infections: definitions, incidence rates, and risk factors

Dialysis nurses' knowledge, attitude, practices, and self-efficacy regarding vascular access care: A multicenter cross-sectional survey in Singapore

Vascular access for hemodialysis in Italy: What a national survey reveals

Expert consensus-based clinical practice guidelines management of intravascular catheters in the intensive care unit

Identifying critically important vascular access outcomes for trials in haemodialysis: an international survey with patients, caregivers and health professionals

Risk of infections related to endovascular catheters and cardiac implantable devices in hemodialysis patients

Barriers and facilitators to vascular access point‐of‐care ultrasound in haemodialysis: An international survey of haemodialysis clinicians

Impact of a training strategy on improving compliance of hand hygiene and gloving during the placement of a short peripheral venous catheter: the multicentre study CleanHand4

Targeted surveillance of vascular access infection in hemodialysis outpatients

Impact of a prevention strategy targeted at vascular-access care on incidence of infections acquired in intensive care

The knowledge, attitudes, and practices of arteriovenous access assessment among hemodialysis nurses: A multicenter cross‐sectional survey

Safe patient care when using vascular access devices

Vascular Access Outcomes Reported in Maintenance Hemodialysis Trials: A Systematic Review

Arteriovenous fistula cannulation in hemodialysis: A vascular access clinical practice guidelines narrative review

Assessments and observations of infection prevention and control practices in US outpatient hemodialysis facilities, 2015–2018: important opportunities for improvement

Anti-infective prescribing practices in critically ill children on continuous renal replacement therapy: a multicenter survey of French-speaking countries

Systematic review of interventions to increase the use of arteriovenous fistulae and grafts in incident haemodialysis patients

Effect of a multimodal prevention strategy on dialysis-associated infection events in outpatients receiving haemodialysis: The DIPS stepped wedge, cluster-randomized trial

[Permanent central venous catheters for dialysis. The situation in Piedmont-Aosta Valley]