Abstract:Objective: To approach the evaluative effect of respiratory variation of superior vena cava peak flow velocity measured using transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) on fluid responsiveness in patients with mechanical ventilation. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted. All mechanical ventilated critically ill patients whose fluid therapy was planned due to hypovolemia in Department of Critical Care Medicine of Beijing Tongren Hospital of Capital Medical University from April 2011 to April 2013 were enrolled. Volume expansion was performed with 500 mL Linger solution within 30 minutes. Patients were classified as responders if pulse pressure variation (PPV) increased ≥ 13% before volume expansion. The respiratory variation in superior vena cava peak velocity was calculated as the difference between maximum and minimum values of velocity in peak A, peak S and peak D over a single respiratory circle, and their variations (ΔA, ΔS, ΔD) were also calculated. The receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC curve) was plotted to assess the evaluative effect of respiratory variation of superior vena cava peak velocity on fluid responsiveness. Results: Twenty-seven patients were enrolled in this study. Volume expansion increased PPV ≥ 13% happened in 14 patients (responders). The velocity of superior vena cava in peak A, peak S, peak D was significantly increased after volume expansion compared with that before volume expansion in responders [peak A (cm/s): 34.6 ± 2.2 vs. 31.3 ± 2.1, t=-2.493, P=0.027; peak S (cm/s): 39.1 ± 1.3 vs. 35.3 ± 2.1, t=-2.564, P=0.024; peak D (cm/s): 28.1 ± 1.2 vs. 23.3 ± 1.4, t=-4.995, P=0.000], but there was no significant difference in ΔA, ΔS and ΔD between before and after volume expansion. The ΔA, ΔS and ΔD were positively correlated with PPV (r=0.040, P=0.854; r=0.350, P=0.074; r=0.749, P=0.000). The area under ROC curve (AUC) of peak S was 0.36 [95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.11-0.52], but the AUC of ΔS was 0.68 (95%CI 0.47-0.89), the AUC of peak D was 0.41 (95%CI 0.19-0.63), but the AUC of ΔD was 0.95 (95%CI 0.86-1.00), so the aberration rate of superior vena cava in respiration was better than the flow rate in superior vena cava. When the cut-off value of ΔS was 20.7% for predicting fluid responsiveness, the sensitivity was 78.6% and the specificity was 61.5%. When the cut-off value of ΔD was 12.7% for predicting fluid responsiveness, the sensitivity was 92.0% and the specificity was 92.3%. Conclusions: Respiratory variations in superior vena cava peak velocity measured by TTE could assess fluid responsiveness in patients with mechanical ventilation.

Stroke volume variation and dynamic arterial elastance predict fluid responsiveness even in thoracoscopic esophagectomy: a prospective observational study

The Predictive Ability Of Carotid Artery Corrected Flow Time And Respirophasic Variation In Blood Flow Peak Velocity Measured By Ultrasonography For Fluid Responsiveness In Parturients For Cesarean Delivery

Can Ultrasonographic Measurement of Respiratory Variability in the Diameter of the Internal Jugular Vein and the Subclavian Vein Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Parturients During Cesarean Delivery? A Prospective Cohort Study

Respiratory stroke volume variation assessed by oesophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness during laparoscopy

Goal-directed Fluid Optimization Based on Stroke Volume Variation and Cardiac Index During One-Lung Ventilation in Patients Undergoing Thoracoscopy Lobectomy Operations: a Pilot Study

Stroke volume changes induced by a recruitment maneuver predict fluid responsiveness in patients with protective ventilation in the operating theater

The predictability of dynamic preload indices depends on the volume of fluid challenge: A prospective observational study in the operating theater

Predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing cardiac surgery: functional haemodynamic parameters including the Respiratory Systolic Variation Test and static preload indicators

Comparative evaluation of stroke volume variation measured by pulse wave transit time and arterial pressure wave

End-expiratory occlusion test predicts fluid responsiveness in cardiac surgical patients in the operating theatre.

Reliability of pulse pressure and stroke volume variation in assessing fluid responsiveness in the operating room: a metanalysis and a metaregression

Dynamic Variables Predict Fluid Responsiveness in Pre-School and School Children Undergoing Neurosurgery: a Prospective Observational Study

Change in Left Ventricular Velocity Time Integral During Trendelenburg Maneuver Predicts Fluid Responsiveness in Cardiac Surgical Patients in the Operating Room

The ability of left ventricular end-diastolic volume variations measured by TEE to monitor fluid responsiveness in high-risk surgical patients during craniotomy: a prospective cohort study

[The assessment of ultrasonic measurement of superior vena cava blood flow for the volume responsiveness of patients with mechanical ventilation]

Comparison of pulse pressure variation versus echocardiography-derived stroke volume variation for prediction of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated anesthetized dogs

Transesophageal Echocardiographic Measurements of the Superior Vena Cava for Predicting Fluid Responsiveness in Patients Undergoing Invasive Positive Pressure Ventilation

Prediction of fluid responsiveness in spontaneously breathing patients with hemodynamic stability: a prospective repeated-measures study

Accuracy of stroke volume variation in predicting fluid responsiveness: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Tidal Volume Challenge-Induced Hemodynamic Changes Can Predict Fluid Responsiveness During One-Lung Ventilation: an Observational Study.

Evaluation of Fluid Responsiveness with Dynamic Superior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index in Mechanically Ventilated Patients