Abstract:Risk preferences - the willingness to accept greater uncertainty to achieve larger potential rewards - determine many aspects of our lives and are often interpreted as an individual trait that reflects a general 'taste' for risk. However, this perspective cannot explain why risk preferences can change considerably across contexts and even across repetitions of the identical decisions. Here we provide modelling and neural evidence that contextual shifts and moment-to-moment fluctuations in risk preferences can emerge mechanistically from Bayesian inference on noisy magnitude representations in parietal cortex. Our participants underwent fMRI while choosing between safe and risky options that were either held in working memory or present on the screen. Risky options that were held in working memory were less likely to be chosen (risk aversion) when they had large payoffs but more likely to be chosen (risk-seeking) when they had small payoffs. These counterintuitive effects are mechanistically explained by a computational model of the Bayesian inference underlying the perception of the payoff magnitudes: Options kept in working memory are noisier and therefore more prone to central tendency biases, leading small (or large) payoffs to be overestimated (or underestimated) more. Congruent with the behavioural modelling, fMRI population-receptive field modelling showed that on trials where intraparietal payoff representations were noisier, choices were also less consistent and less risk-neutral, in line with participants resorting more to their prior belief about potential payoffs. Our results highlight that individual risk preferences and their puzzling changes across contexts and choice repetitions are mechanistically rooted in perceptual inference on noisy parietal magnitude representations, with profound implications for economic, psychological, and neuroscience theories of risky behaviour.

Reference-Point Theory: An Account of Individual Differences in Risk Preferences

Double Reference Points: the Effects of Social and Financial Reference Points on Decisions under Risk

Riskier for Me or for Others? the Role of Domain and Probability in Self-Other Differences, in Risky Decision-Making

Where You Stand Affects the Risks You Take: Socially Reference-Dependent Risk Attitudes

Three gaps and what they may mean for risk preference

Risk-sensitivity Theory: Need Motivates Risky Decision-Making

Social Reference Points and Risk Taking

An agent-based model of repeated decision making under risk: modeling the role of alternate reference points and risk behavior on long-run outcomes

Risk evaluation and behaviour: defining appropriate frames of reference

Risk Preference: A View from Psychology

Can Prospect Theory Explain the Disposition Effect? A New Perspective on Reference Points

Stability of risk preferences and the reflection effect of prospect theory

How Consideration of Future Consequences, Prior Gain or Loss, Personal Risk Profile, and Justification Affect Risk–Payoff Preferences

The effect of social reference points on self-other risk decision-making

Are decisions under risk malleable?

Risk Perception And Risky Choice: Situational, Informational And Dispositional Effects

Reference‐Dependent Risk‐Taking in the NBA

The Relative Importance of the Contrast and Assimilation Effects in Decisions Under Risk

Behavioral Portfolio Optimization with Social Reference Point.

When (and why) absolute decision attribute values influence human preferences

Rapid Changes in Risk Preferences Originate from Bayesian Inference on Parietal Magnitude Representations