Abstract:Purpose: Relaxometry, specifically T1 and T2 mapping, has become an essential technique for assessing the properties of biological tissues related to various physiological and pathological conditions. Many techniques are being used to estimate T1 and T2 relaxation times, ranging from the traditional inversion or saturation recovery and spin echo sequences to more advanced methods. Choosing the appropriate method for a specific application is critical since the precision and accuracy of T1 and T2 measurements are influenced by a variety of factors including the pulse sequence and its parameters, the inherent properties of the tissue being examined, the MRI hardware, and the image reconstruction. The aim of this study is to evaluate and compare the test retest reproducibility of two advanced MRI relaxometry techniques (Driven Equilibrium Single Pulse Observation of T1 and T2, DESPOT, and 3D Quantification using an interleaved Look Locker acquisition Sequence with a T2 preparation pulse, QALAS), for T1 and T2 mapping in a healthy volunteer cohort. Methods: 10 healthy volunteers underwent brain MRI at 1.3 mm3 isotropic resolution, acquiring DESPOT and QALAS data (about 11.8 and about 5 minutes duration, including field maps, respectively), test retest with subject repositioning, on a 3.0 Tesla Philips Ingenia Elition scanner. To reconstruct the T1 and T2 maps, we used an equation based algorithm for DESPOT and a dictionary based algorithm that incorporates inversion efficiency and B1 field inhomogeneity for QALAS. The test retest reproducibility was assessed using the coefficient of variation (CoV), intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland Altman plots. Results: Our results indicate that both the DESPOT and QALAS techniques demonstrate good levels of test retest reproducibility for T1 and T2 mapping across the brain. Higher whole brain voxel to voxel ICCs are observed in QALAS for T1 (0.84) and in DESPOT for T2 (0.897). The Bland Altman plots show smaller bias and variability of T1 estimates for QALAS (mean of negative 0.02 s, and upper and lower limits of negative 0.14 and 0.11 s, 95% CI) than for DESPOT (mean of negative 0.02 s, and limits of negative 0.31 and 0.27 s). QALAS also showed less variability (mean 1.08 ms, limits negative 1.88 to 4.04 ms) for T2 compared to DESPOT (mean of 2.56 ms, and limits negative 17.29 to 22.41 ms). The within subject CoVs for QALAS range from 0.6% (T2 in CSF) to 5.8% (T2 in GM), while for DESPOT they range from 2.1% (T2 in CSF) to 6.7% (T2 in GM). The between subject CoVs for QALAS range from 2.5% (T2 in GM) to 12% (T2 in CSF), and for DESPOT they range from 3.7% (T2 in WM) to 9.3% (T2 in CSF). Conclusion: Overall, QALAS demonstrated better reproducibility for T1 and T2 measurements than DESPOT, in addition to reduced acquisition time.

Time-efficient, high-resolution 3T whole-brain relaxometry using 3D-QALAS with wave-CAIPI readouts

3D-CAIPI-BUDA and Joint Hankel Low-Rank Reconstruction Enable Rapid and Distortion-free High-Resolution T2* Mapping and QSM

3D-EPI Blip-Up/Down Acquisition (BUDA) with CAIPI and Joint Hankel Structured Low-Rank Reconstruction for Rapid Distortion-Free High-Resolution T2* Mapping

Rotated spiral RARE for high spatial and temporal resolution volumetric arterial spin labeling acquisition

Rapid 3D Dynamic Arterial Spin Labeling with a Sparse Model-Based Image Reconstruction

Three-dimensional Simultaneous Brain Mapping of T1, T2, T2*and Magnetic Susceptibility with MR Multitasking

Three-dimensional simultaneous brain T 1 , T 2 , and ADC mapping with MR Multitasking.

Three-dimensional simultaneous brain T<sub>1</sub>, T<sub>2</sub>, and ADC mapping with MR Multitasking

Time-efficient, high-resolution 3T whole-brain relaxometry using Cartesian 3D MR-STAT with CSF suppression

High-resolution myelin-water fraction and quantitative relaxation mapping using 3D ViSTa-MR fingerprinting

Silent 3D MR sequence for quantitative and multicontrast T1 and proton density imaging

Rapid three-dimensional multiparametric MRI with quantitative transient-state imaging

Brain Parcellation Repeatability and Reproducibility Using Conventional and Quantitative 3D MR Imaging

Zero‐DeepSub: Zero‐shot deep subspace reconstruction for rapid multiparametric quantitative MRI using 3D‐QALAS

Zero-DeepSub: Zero-Shot Deep Subspace Reconstruction for Rapid Multiparametric Quantitative MRI Using 3D-QALAS

A comprehensive protocol for quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of the brain at 3 Tesla

Ultrafast Compartmentalized Relaxation Time Mapping with Linear Algebraic Modeling

Cross‐vendor multiparametric mapping of the human brain using 3D‐QALAS: A multicenter and multivendor study

Comparison of test-retest reproducibility of DESPOT and 3D-QALAS for water T1 and T2 mapping

Time‐efficient, high‐resolution 3T whole‐brain relaxometry using Cartesian 3D MR Spin TomogrAphy in Time‐Domain (MR‐STAT) with cerebrospinal fluid suppression

SSL-QALAS: Self-Supervised Learning for Rapid Multiparameter Estimation in Quantitative MRI Using 3D-QALAS