Evaluation of pregnancy per artificial insemination of dairy animals detected in estrus during the synchronization protocol and assigned to conventional or sexed semen

M H C Pereira,B I Cappellozza,A K M Kloster,M Mamedes,J L M Vasconcelos

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anireprosci.2023.107324

Abstract:Three experiments were designed to evaluate the effects of conventional and sexed-semen on reproductive performance of dairy females detected in estrus. In Exp. 1, 978 lactating Holstein cows and 116 Holstein heifers were used. Cows or heifers were randomly assigned to receive conventional (CONV) or sexed (SEXD) semen on day 0 of a TAI protocol. The TAI was performed using commercial CONV or SEXD frozen-thawed semen from the same 6 Holstein bulls, and SEXD semen was sexed through fluorescence cytometry. In Exp. 2, 390 lactating Holstein × Gir dairy cows and 344 Holstein × Gir heifers were used. Cows and heifers were randomly assigned to receive CONV or SEXD semen on day 0 with frozen-thawed semen from 5 Holstein × Gir bulls. The SEXD was sorted through the Sexcel™ methodology. In Exp. 3, 789 primiparous lactating Holstein cows were enrolled. Cows were randomly assigned to receive CONV or SEXD semen from 5 Holstein bulls, and the SEXD semen was sexed using the same semen allocation methodology described in Exp. 2. All data were analyzed using SAS. Regardless of the experiment, no treatment × bull interaction was observed for any of the variables analyzed herein (P ≥ 0.20). In Exp. 1, multiparous cows assigned to CONV had a greater P/AI vs. cohorts assigned to SEXD (P < 0.01) and a similar response tended to be observed for secundiparous cows (P = 0.10). No treatment effects were further observed when the effects of semen on day 60 P/AI were stratified by heat stress, milk yield, and CL at the beginning of the protocol. In Exp. 2, no P/AI differences between treatment were detected either on days 32 (P = 0.32) or 60 of pregnancy (P = 0.20). In Exp. 3, cows assigned to SEXD had reduced P/AI on day 32 (P = 0.03) and tended to have a reduced P/AI on day 60 of pregnancy (P = 0.06). No further treatment effects or interactions were observed herein (P ≥ 0.13). Overall P/AI of SEXD semen was 78% of the CONV (P < 0.01), but the variation of these results requires some attention. Moreover, an additional analysis was performed considering the median value of P/AI in bulls assigned to CONV and SEXD, and bulls that had a greater P/AI in CONV also had a greater P/AI in SEXD (P = 0.03). In summary, although not directly comparable, the sexing technologies herein provided similar results in heifers, but not in other categories (primiparous, secundiparous, and multiparous cows). Additionally, the P/AI of a sexed semen is associated to its performance on the conventional semen counterpart. Moreover, in the present experiment, no other parameters were shown to impact fertility of dairy females assigned to conventional or sexed-semen.