[Analysis on Change in Soil Organic Carbon Content of Farmland in Yangtze River Economic Belt Under Different Fertilizing Measures]

Xin-Yu Liu,Jiang Lu,Xuan Meng,Zheng Liu,Peng Song,Ji Li,Guang-Ming Tian
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202204315
2023-08-08
Abstract:The literature from a long-term fertilization experiment in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from January 1992 to May 2022 was collected, and the data of farmland soil organic carbon were extracted and integrated. Using the normalization treatment and the analysis method of relative annual variation, the overall change in soil organic carbon content in farmland in the Yangtze River Economic Belt under different long-term fertilization measures was studied, and the change differences of soil organic carbon content under three tillage modes were compared so as to judge and analyze the influence of the duration of the experiment on soil organic carbon dynamics. The results showed that under different long-term fertilization measures, the organic carbon content of farmland soil in the Yangtze River Economic Belt in China showed an overall upward trend. The NP, NPK, O, and NPKO treatments all increased the organic carbon content of agricultural soils, with that of the NPKO treatment being the largest. The sole application of inorganic nitrogen fertilizer reduced the organic carbon content of the soil. The rates of change in soil organic carbon content were 0.22 g·(kg·a)-1, 0.24 g·(kg·a)-1, and 0.16 g·(kg·a)-1for dryland, paddy, and water-dry rotation farmland, respectively. Additionally, the relatively rapid increase effect of organic carbon brought by the O and NPKO treatments could last for no more than 28 years in dryland soil but could still last for more than 28 years in paddy field and paddy-upland rotation soil. There was some variation in the rate of change of soil organic carbon content between soil types. The average rate of change of organic carbon was 0.25 g·(kg·a)-1for red soils, 0.14 g·(kg·a)-1 for brown soils, 0.19 g·(kg·a)-1 for tidal soils, and 0.15 g·(kg·a)-1 for rice soils. The trend of NPKO>O>NPK>NPK>NP>N was basically maintained for the rate of change in soil organic carbon content. The NPKO treatments were all significantly higher than the chemical fertilizer (N, NP, and NPK) treatments alone. The N treatment showed a reduction in organic carbon content in both red soil and rice soils. Considering the carbon fixation of farmland soil, the combined application of organic and inorganic fertilizers is a more suitable fertilization method in this area.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?