Children's fingers and spurious pulse oximetry

M. Serpell
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1991.tb09747.x
IF: 12.893
1991-08-01
Anaesthesia
Abstract:staining of the upper trachea was noted but the other was clear. All patients received intravenous dexamethasone while still under the anaesthetic. Auscultation of the lung fields in all patients remained clear throughout. No attempt was made to remove the LM, administer suxamethonium or intubate the trachea in any of the patients. All recovered normally, with normal postoperative chest X rays. An additional case, resembling that described by Koehlil occurred while I was demonstrating an early commercial LM for a cholecystectomy in a short, obese woman (a patient in whom I would now no longer use it). Left-sided bronchial spasm was noted fibrescopically after facemask, laryngeal mask and finally tracheal tube ventilation had all been found difficult. Interestingly, an 8-mm tracheal tube had been passed into the oesophagus after LM insertion to demonstrate the feasability of the technique. A gastric tube was passed down this into the stomach, which was found to be empty, prior to starting surgery. It seemed possible, in retrospect, that the patient had aspirated on induction while breathing against a partially obstructed upper airway. A bile-stained mucous plug was expectorated on the second postoperative day; the patient recovered fully. If there is evidence that regurgitation is occurring, it should be remembered that the mask serves to obliterate the space in the pharynx which would otherwise act as a reservoir for regurgitated fluid. Fluid entering the bowl of the LM is not ‘directed preferentially’ into the trachea as has been stated.’.* There is merely less of it to be aspirated at any given moment, because the pharyngeal reservoir has been filled by the inflated mask cuff. Moreover, fluid entering the bowl of the mask is free to escape up the tube during expiration, offering rapid visible evidence through the transparent tube wall. Suction should therefore be applied through the LM tube, not the pharynx. The suggestion that regurgitation risks are lessened by removal of the mask in the operating theatre and placing the patient in the lateral position for transfer to recovery area’ is not borne out by my own experience, in which removal has been carried out by trained recovery staff without serious mishap since 1982. However, regurgitation might be provoked by high intra-abhminal pressures resulting from spasmodic reaction to pain in the partially anaesthetised patient. This situation is commonly observed when patients are turned on their sides at the conclusion of surgery. Another possible cause of regurgitation is transmission of high negative intrathoracic pressures to the oesophagus if laryngeal spasm is provoked by surgical stimulation at inadequate levels of anaesthesia. Adequate anaesthesia during surgery and avoidance of disturbing the patient during recovery are certainly fundamental to smooth, uneventful use of the LM. Might these factors not also be important in reducing the likelihood of unexpected regurgitation in the technically fasted patient?
What problem does this paper attempt to address?