Abstract:Background: Hospital-acquired pressure injuries cause significant harm to afflicted individuals, and financially burden hospitals. Most pressure injuries are avoidable with the use of preventative interventions. However, within acute hospital settings the effectiveness of pressure injury preventative interventions, as demonstrated by high-level evidence, requires examination. Objective: Analyse the effectiveness of interventions to prevent pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings. Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Data sources: CINAHL, MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science and Embase were searched in May/June 2019. In April 2020, searches were updated to the end of 2019. Methods: Randomised controlled trials which investigated the effectiveness of pressure injury preventative interventions on pressure injury incidence, within adults admitted to acute hospital settings, were included. Trials limited to pressure injury treatment or specialty areas, and non-English reports, were excluded. Screening, extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were undertaken independently by two reviewers, with a third as arbitrator. Included studies were grouped by intervention type. Studies were synthesised narratively, and meta-analysis was undertaken where study interventions were similar. Using a random-effects model, primary meta-analyses were undertaken using intention-to-treat data. Results: Of 2000 records, 45 studies were included in the systematic review which investigated nine different intervention types: continence management, heel protection devices, medication, nutrition, positioning, prophylactic dressings, support surfaces, topical preparations and bundled interventions. All studies were judged to be at unclear or high risk-of-bias. Several meta-analyses were undertaken, pooled by intervention type. Most pooled samples were heterogeneous. Based on intention-to-treat data, only one intervention demonstrated a statistically significant effect: Australian medical sheepskin surfaces compared to other standard care surfaces (risk ratio 0.42, p = 0.006, I2 = 36%), but included studies were limited by bias and age. Following per protocol meta-analyses, only two intervention types demonstrated a significant effect: support surfaces (active versus other comparison [risk ratio = 0.54, p = 0.005, I2 = 43%] and standard surfaces [risk ratio = 0.31, p < 0.001, I2 = 0%]; and reactive versus other comparison surfaces [risk ratio = 0.53, p = 0.03, I2 = 64%]) and heel protection devices versus standard care (risk ratio = 0.38, p < 0.001, I2 = 36%). Conclusions: Only one intervention was supported by intention-to-treat meta-analysis. Significantly, all trials were at unclear or high risk-of-bias; and there were several limitations regarding heterogeneity across trials and trial outcomes. Further large-scale, high-quality trials testing pressure injury preventative interventions are required to establish effectiveness within acute hospital settings. Attention should be paid to true intention-to-treat analysis, and acute and intensive care settings should be reported separately. PROSPERO registration number:CRD42019129556.

Development of prone positioning and skin damage prevention digital education: the PRONEtect project

Enhancing prone positioning and skin damage prevention education: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial comparing a digital education hub (PRONEtect) and a traditional lecture on final-year nursing participants' confidence and knowledge

Pressure Injury Prevention in Patients in Prone Position With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome and COVID-19

Strategies to preventing pressure injuries among intensive care unit patients mechanically ventilated in prone position: a systematic review and a Delphi study

Pressure injuries in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients utilising different prone positioning techniques – A prospective observational study

Summary of the evidence for the prevention of device related pressure ulcers in patients with prone position ventilation

Nursing care and prevalence of adverse events in prone position: Characteristics of mechanically ventilated patients with severe SARS‐CoV‐2 pulmonary infection

E-learning—an interventional element of the PRiVENT project to improve weaning expertise

Preventing Pressure Injuries in Neonates Undergoing Therapeutic Hypothermia for Hypoxic-Ischemic Encephalopathy: An Interprofessional Quality Improvement Project

Feasibility, acceptability, and usability of implementing a medical device-related pressure injury algorithm for critically ill patients using non-invasive ventilation

Prevention of face pressure injuries associated with non-invasive ventilation: scoping review

[A project to reduce the incidence of facial pressure ulcers caused by prolonged surgery with prone positioning]

PROTECT - trial: a multicentre prospective pragmatic RCT and health economic analysis of the effect of tailored repositioning to prevent pressure ulcers - study protocol

Positioning immobile critically ill patients who are at risk of pressure injuries using a purpose‐designed positioning device and usual care equipment: An observational feasibility study

Pressure ulcers related to prone positioning: a pandemic amidst a pandemic

Pressure injury prevalence in critical care settings: An observational pre‐post intervention study

Decreasing Intraoperative Skin Damage in Prone-Position Surgeries

Sustained Reduction of Nasal Pressure Injuries in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit With the Use of Bubble Continuous Positive Airway Pressure: A Quality Improvement Project

Non-invasive Ventilation Interventions for Skin Injury Prevention: Scoping Review

Effectiveness of interventions to prevent pressure injury in adults admitted to acute hospital settings: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Complications associated with prone positioning in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients: A multicentre, retrospective observational study