Treatment intensification following glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist treatment in type 2 diabetes: The RESTORE-G real-world study

Riccardo Candido,Antonio Nicolucci,Monica Larosa,Maria Chiara Rossi,Raffaele Napoli,RESTORE-G (Retrospective analysis on the therapeutic approaches after GLP-1 RA treatment in type 2 diabetes patients) Study Group,Enrico Gabellieri,Elena Tortato,Rosa Anna Rabini,Dalia Crazzolara,Luigi Lucibelli,Concetta Aragiusto,Gianluigi Panzolato,Maurizio Di Mauro,Andrea Del Buono,Giuseppe Placentino,Graziano Di Cianni,Gabriele Brandoni,Stefano Fazion,Giovanna Gregori,Antonino Di Benedetto,Carlo De Riva,Annamaria Terracciano,Luciano Zenari,Franco Cavalot,Francesca Porcellati,Roberto Anichini,Giuseppe Citro,Paola D'Angelo,Marcello Arca,Lelio Morviducci,Valeria Montani,Paolo Fiorentini
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.numecd.2023.07.025
Abstract:Background and aims: To assess intensification approaches with basal insulin (BI) following glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) treatment in type 2 diabetes (T2D). Methods and results: Real-world data were collected in electronic medical records by 32 Italian diabetes clinics between 2011 and 2021. Primary endpoint was the proportion of insulin-naïve T2D patients treated with GLP-1 RA who initiated (add-on or switch) BI. Secondary endpoints were: treatment approaches, mean time to BI start, effectiveness and safety. Among 7,962 eligible patients, BI was prescribed to 3,164 (39.7%; 95%CI 38.7; 40.8): 67.6% switched to BI (22.1% also starting 1-3 injections of short-acting insulin), 22.7% added BI while maintaining GLP-1 RA, and 9.7% switched to a fixed-ratio combination of GLP-1 RA and BI (FRC). Median time since the first GLP-1 RA to BI/FRC prescription was 27.4 (IQ range 11.8-53.5) months. In this study 60.3% of patients did not start BI/FRC, among whom 15.2% intensified GLP-1 RA therapy with other oral agents. Effectiveness and safety were documented in all intensification approaches with BI/FRC, but HbA1c level at intensification time of ≥9.0% and suboptimal BI titration suggested clinical inertia. Use of second generation BI and add-on to GLP-1 RA schemes increased over time and effectiveness improved. Conclusion: Clinical inertia should be overcome using innovative insulin options. Timely combination therapy of BI and GLP-1 RA is a valuable choice.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?