Rehabilitation Interventions for Old Adults with Post COVID-19 Infection: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trails
Jie Deng,Chenyuan Qin,Minjung Lee,Yubin Lee,Myoungsoon You,Jue Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4676944
2023-01-01
Abstract:Background: Post COVID-19 infection is of particular concern among old adults. Some interventions have been employed to improve symptoms, capacity, and quality of life in patients with post COVID-19 infection, yet there is still a lack of evidence on the effectiveness of these interventions for old adults. Thus, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing randomized controlled trails (RCTs), aimed to aimed to comprehensively summarize the pattern and effectiveness of current rehabilitation interventions for old adults with post COVID-19 infection. Methods: We systematically searched studies published up to 15 November 2023 in PubMed, EMBASE, Web of science, ScienceDirect and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized controlled trails (RCTs) compared rehabilitation interventions with other control in old adults (mean or median age of 60 or older) with post COVID-19 infection were included. We performed a meta-analysis to compare the effects of the rehabilitation interventions with the common control group. Difference in mean (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) with its 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used as summary statistics. Moreover, subgroup analyses based on the intervention programmes, severity in acute infection, and age of participants were carried out.Findings: A total of 11 RCTs involving 832 participants (64.37±7.94 years, 52.2% were men) were included in the analysis. Meta-analysis results showed that compared with the control groups, rehabilitation interventions significantly improved 6-minute walking test (6MWT; MD, 15.77m [95%CI, 5.40-26.13], p<0.01), 30 s sit-to-stand test (MD, 4.11 n [95% CI, 2.46-5.76], p<0.001), fatigue (SMD, -0.66 [95%CI, -1.13 to -0.19], p<0.01), aspects of quality of life, independence in activities of daily living (SMD, 0.31 [95%CI, 0.14-0.48], p<0.001), depression (SMD, -0.89 [95%CI, -1.76 to -0.02], p<0.05) and anxiety (SMD, -0.81 [95%CI, -1.58 to -0.05], p<0.05). However, the improvement of hand grip strength (HGS) and pulmonary function was not statistically significant (p>0.05). Subgroup analyses showed that improvements in 6MWT, fatigue, anxiety, and depression were more pronounced in old patients who received exercise training, while those who received respiratory rehabilitation had more pronounced improvements in pulmonary function and quality of life.Interpretation: Old adults with post COVID-19 infection who underwent rehabilitation interventions experienced significant improvement in functional capacity, fatigue, quality of life, independence in activities of daily living, and reductions in depression and anxiety outcomes compared with those who receiving usual or standard care. These findings suggest that screening, management, and rehabilitation interventions for long COVID in old adults should be strengthened to improve the complete health status and functional status of older patients, thereby reducing the long-term disease burden caused by long COVID-19.Funding: This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.7221101017).Declaration of Interest: Authors declare no conflict of interest with the content of this article.