Association between within-visit blood pressure variability, stroke, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular mortality

Bhrugun Anisetti,Hossam Youssef,Ahamed M Elkhair,Michelle P Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5603/pjnns.94839
Abstract:Introduction: Long-term variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events. Little is known about any association between within-visit SBP variability, stroke, coronary heart disease (CHD), and cardiovascular (CV) death. Material and methods: Participants included adults ≥ 18 years who participated in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys from 1999 to 2012 linked to the national death index in 2012. Stroke was self-reported. SBP was obtained up to four times by a physician, using a manual sphygmomanometer according to standard procedures. Within-visit SBP variability was defined as the standard deviation of the BP measurements, stratified into quartiles. We evaluated the relationship between within-visit SBP variability and the odds of stroke or CHD using multivariable logistic regression, and with CV mortality, using multivariable Cox regression. Results: Of the 27,987 adults, 16.4% were aged ≥ 65 years, 51.3% were female, 71.2% were white, and 10.7% were black. Factors associated with higher mean SBP variability included older age, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, and smoking (all p < 0.05). The prevalence of stroke significantly increased across SBP variability quartiles, from 2.1% for quartile 1 to 3.7% for quartile 4 (p < 0.001). High SBP variability was associated with higher odds of stroke [odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-2.2], coronary heart disease (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.6-2.4), and increased risk of CV mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.7, 95% CI 2.3-3.1]. The relationships were not observed after adjusting for covariables. Conclusions: Within-visit variability in SBP is associated with increased risks of stroke, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular mortality, but the relationship is confounded by age and covariates.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?