Orthotopic Mouse Models of Urinary Bladder Cancer

Ji-In Noh,Eun-Jung Ahn,Myung-Giun Noh,Kyung-Sub Moon,Euiheon Chung,Chan Choi,Kyung-Hwa Lee,Sung Sun Kim
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21873/invivo.13301
In Vivo
Abstract:Background/aim: Urinary bladder cancer has various etiologies and tends to recur and then progress to a higher grade. When muscles are invaded, the response to conventional therapy is poor and the quality of life deteriorates rapidly. Here, we summarize and compare two representative methods used to create the syngeneic mouse models required for immunological research. Materials and methods: In this study, we utilized six-week-old female C3H/HeNCrl mice and the mouse bladder tumor cell line MBT-2. The first method involved transurethral catheterization with poly-L-lysine pretreatment (catheter group), while the second method involved transperitoneal incision and direct injection of tumor cells into the bladder wall (open group). Mouse postoperative status was monitored on a weekly basis using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Results: The catheter group had a tumor development rate of 47% (7 out of 15 mice), with only 1 mouse developing an intravesical tumor. In contrast, the open group had a higher tumor formation rate of 69% (47 out of 68 mice), with 27 mice showing intravesical tumor formation. Notably, with a lower cell count, urinary obstruction events were observed 2 weeks post-inoculation, which is one week later than the higher cell count group. Conclusion: In this study, we conducted a comparative analysis between the transurethral catheterization method and the transperitoneal incision and direct injection method in animal bladder tumor models. Our findings provide evidence of the consistent effectiveness in constructing a stable model within the open group. Well-designed orthotopic animal models are essential.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?