Disentangling mood and pain: a commentary on 2 manuscripts.
K. Martucci
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000000746
IF: 7.926
Pain
Abstract:Mood, negative affect, and pain are entangled in complex ways. Earlier investigations identified the need to improve mood for analgesic medications to be effective. Although mood is typically a more transient, flexible state compared with affect, both mood and affect represent an important component of chronic pain conditions including chronic low back pain and fibromyalgia. In this issue of PAIN, Letzen and Robinson importantly extend our knowledge of mood’s influence on resting state functional connectivity (ie, correlated oscillatory activity among brain regions), as demonstrated previously in healthy volunteers, by investigating mood’s effect in a chronic low back pain population. When mood was altered, it changed functional connectivity between default mode network hub seed regions (medial prefrontal cortex [mPFC] and posterior cingulate cortex [PCC]) with a different constellation of changes for patients as compared with healthy controls. Meanwhile, in another publication in this issue, López-Solà et al. uncover the effects of negative affect on a neurological pain signature (NPS) for fibromyalgia. As individual brain regions, the PCC plays a role in selfreflection and introspection, and activity within the mPFC is related to determining value and cost of reward, among other correlated functions. As for the relationship between selfreflection/introspection, reward cost/value, and pain, the subjective experience of pain is often synonymous with performing self-reflection to monitor and ideally reduce it. The induction of negativemood increases the acute pain response and increases chronic back pain. Individuals unable to practice effective mindfulness meditation have greater anxiety levels and greater PCC activity, possibly reflecting excess self-introspection. Even in localized urological chronic pelvic pain, increased PCC functional connectivity is correlated with ratings of self-esteem, self-confidence, and quality of relationships underscoring the theme of intertwined neural correlates of introspection and affective states. How do we resolve the potential confounds of mood and negative affect in our quest to understand how neural circuits are altered in chronic pain? Some options are as follows: (A) to identify separate, specific pain, andmood signatures by including patients without comorbid depression or anxiety, and directly manipulating mood states; (B) to give up on such research concluding, “It’s too complicated!”; and (C) to identify each neurologic signature “as is” and then measure correlated effects of negative affect, mood, pain, and other covariates and comorbidities. Letzen and Robinson provide clear evidence that mood status influences resting state activity in persons with chronic low back pain. Hopefully, this workwill be expanded on to determine how activity between and within other brain networks and regions are affected by mood, and further, whether these effects differ among persons who vary with regard to type of chronic pain, sex, race, etc. In addition, even when transient mood effects are measured directly, there may be compounding effects of positive and negative affect. Also in this issue of PAIN, López-Solà et al. provide an elegant example of how to disentangle these complex confounds. The information provided by their research paves the way for future studies and encourages investigators to delve deeper into the new questions that arise from their article. Interestingly, in their article, these authors pursued option “A” by validating an NPS in healthy volunteers, highly specific to pain but not affective states. However, after applying their original NPS to the fibromyalgia population, the signature was no longer free from effects of affect, anxiety levels, medication status, and pain severity. They then rigorously tested correlations for each of these factors to determine that patients with higher symptom severity were also medicated for anxiety and depression, yet, in these patients the symptom severity outweighed the potential (moodimproving) effects of medication. Although mood influences many things (eg, brain circuits, response to analgesic medications, acute pain response, and chronic pain experience), the question of “how?” is a fascinating one. López-Solà et al., while also assessing neural response to pressure-induced pain and multisensory stimulation, reinforce classic knowledge that increased subjective pain ratings match increased pain-related brain activation in healthy controls and in patients with fibromyalgia. Considering that mood and affect are complexly integrated within this same system, where are the effects of mood-induced pain increases/decreases taking place? Mood might be casting a positive or negative effect first on the cognitive subjective experience (eg, as one thinks about and selects a pain rating), then, in turn, reducing pain through top–down mechanisms. For example, induced changes in mood can recruit increased mPFC activity, which is correlated with changes in periaqueductal gray activity, thereby suggesting a brain circuit by which mood changes influence and reduce acute pain. Negative mood might decrease ventral striatum activity, that in turn, increases pain by a lack of inhibition from reward circuits. Recently, Schwartz et al. identified in a study of rodents a specific galanin-based mechanism in the nucleus Sponsorships or competing interests that may be relevant to content are disclosed at the end of this article.