Abstract:Preterm infants and neonates with respiratory conditions commonly require intubation and conventional mechanical ventilation (CMV) to maintain airway patency and support their respiration. Whilst this therapy is often lifesaving, it simultaneously carries the risk of lung injury. The use of lung recruitment manoeuvres (LRMs) has been found to reduce the incidence of lung injury, and improve oxygenation and lung compliance in ventilated adults. However, evidence pertaining to their use in neonates is limited, and there is no consensus of opinion as to whether LRMs are appropriate or effective in this population. To determine the effects of LRMs on mortality and respiratory outcomes in mechanically ventilated neonates, when compared to no recruitment (routine care). We used the standard search strategy of Cochrane Neonatal to search the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL 2020, Issue 4) in the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE via Ovid (1946 to 13 April 2020), and CINAHL via EBSCOhost (1989 to 13 April 2020). We also handsearched the reference lists of retrieved studies to source additional articles. We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs), quasi‐RCTs and randomised cross‐over studies that compared the effect of LRMs to no recruitment (routine care) in mechanically ventilated neonates. Two review authors independently assessed trial eligibility, extracted data and evaluated risk of bias in the included studies. When studies were sufficiently similar, we performed a meta‐analysis using mean difference (MD) for continuous data and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, with their respective 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence for key (clinically important) outcomes. We included four studies (152 participants in total) in this review. Three of these studies, enrolling 56 participants, contributed data to our prespecified outcomes. Two studies enrolling 44 participants on CMV for respiratory distress syndrome compared a stepwise LRM with positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEP) to routine care. Meta‐analysis demonstrated no evidence of a difference between the LRM and routine care on mortality by hospital discharge (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.17 to 5.77; low‐certainty evidence), incidence of bronchopulmonary dysplasia (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.03 to 2.07; low‐certainty evidence), duration of supplemental oxygen (MD ‐7.52 days, 95% CI ‐20.83 to 5.78; very low‐certainty evidence), and duration of ventilatory support (MD ‐3.59 days, 95% CI ‐12.97 to 5.79; very low‐certainty evidence). The certainty of the evidence for these outcomes was downgraded due to risk of bias, imprecision, and inconsistency. Whilst these studies contributed data to four of our primary outcomes, we were unable to identify any studies that reported our other primary outcomes: duration of continuous positive airway pressure therapy, duration of neonatal intensive care unit stay, and duration of hospital stay. The third study that contributed data to the review enrolled 12 participants on CMV for respiratory and non‐respiratory causes, and compared two different LRMs applied after endotracheal tube suctioning to routine care. It was determined that both LRMs may slightly improve end‐expiratory lung volume at 120 minutes' post‐suctioning, when compared to routine care (incremental PEEP LRM versus routine care: MD ‐0.21, 95% CI ‐0.37 to ‐0.06; double PEEP LRM versus routine care: MD ‐0.18, 95% CI ‐0.35 to ‐0.02). It was also demonstrated that a double PEEP LRM may slightly reduce mean arterial pressure at 30 minutes' post‐suctioning, when compared with routine care (MD ‐16.00, 95% CI ‐29.35 to ‐2.65). There is insufficient evidence to guide the use of LRMs in mechanically ventilated neonates. Well‐designed randomised trials with larger sample sizes are needed to further evaluate the potential benefits and risks of LRM application in this population. Review question In mechanically ventilated neonates, do lung recruitment manoeuvres (LRMs) help to reduce mortality and respiratory morbidity, compared to no recruitment? Background Critically ill neonates (infants from birth up to four weeks of age) commonly require intubation (placement of a breathing tube in the windpipe) and conventional mechanical ventilation (the use of a breathing machine) to support their breathing. Whilst this therapy is often lifesaving, it also carries the risk of lung injury. LRMs have been suggested to reduce the incidence of lung injury and improve respiratory outcomes in ventilated patients. A LRM involves deliberately increasing airway pressure for a brief period, which serves to reopen collapsed lung regions. LRMs have proved effective in ventilated adults; however, evidence regarding their use in neonates is limited. There is no consensus of opinion as to whether LRMs are appropriate or effective in this population. Stud -Abstract Truncated-

Impact of Stepwise Recruitment Maneuvers on Cerebral Hemodynamics: Experimental Study in Neonatal Model

Safety and efficacy evaluation of the automatic stepwise recruitment maneuver in the neonatal population: An in vivo interventional study. Can anesthesiologists safely perform automatic lung recruitment maneuvers in neonates?

[Lung protective strategies of ventilation in respiratory distress syndrome of neonates].

Impact of Manual Sustained Inflation vs Stepwise PEEP on Pulmonary and Cerebral Outcomes in Carotid Endarterectomy Patients

Effects of lung recruitment maneuvers using mechanical ventilator on preterm hemodynamics

Lung ultrasound-guided best positive end-expiratory pressure in neonatal anesthesia: a proposed randomized, controlled study

Change in stroke volume during alveolar recruitment maneuvers through transient continuous positive airway pressure or stepwise increase in positive end expiratory pressure in anesthetized patients: a prospective randomized double-blind study

PEEP-Induced Lung Recruitment Maneuver Combined with Prone Position for ARDS: A Single-Center, Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

Lung recruitment manoeuvres for reducing mortality and respiratory morbidity in mechanically ventilated neonates.

Impact on cerebral hemodynamics of the use of volume guarantee combined with high frequency oscillatory ventilation in a neonatal animal respiratory distress model

Efficacy Analysis of the Lung Recruitment Maneuver in Correcting Pulmonary Atelectasis in Neurological Intensive Care Unit-a Retrospective Study.

Lung ultrasound evaluation of incremental PEEP recruitment maneuver in children undergoing cardiac surgery.

Efficacy and safety of single versus repeated stepwise cycling recruitment maneuver during one-lung ventilation in patients with normal pulmonary function undergoing video-assisted thoracoscopic lung surgery: a randomized, controlled trial

The Effect of Recruitment Maneuvers on Cerebrovascular Dynamics and Right Ventricular Function in Patients with Acute Brain Injury: A Single-Center Prospective Study

Lung recruitment by continuous negative extra-thoracic pressure support following one-lung ventilation: an experimental study

Impact of neonatal noninvasive resuscitation strategies on lung mechanics, tracheal pressure, and tidal volume in preterm lambs

Effect of prone positioning ventilation on pulmonary function in neonates during venous-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

A novel insight in exploring the positive end expiratory pressure for sustained ventilation after lung recruitment in a porcine model of acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Effects of APRV-BIPAP ventilation On lung recruitment/open maneuvers in piglets with acute lung injury

Physiological Effects of Different Recruitment Maneuvers for Improved Lung Inhomogeneity in a Pig Model of ARDS

Effects of positive end-expiratory pressure on brain oxygenation, systemic oxygen cascade and metabolism in acute brain injured patients: a pilot physiological cross-sectional study