Abstract:Introduction Home automation can deliver important outcomes for people with disabilities, including enhanced independence. Despite the millions of dollars spent on home automation in Australia and other developed nations, to date, there has been no economic evaluation of this type of assistive technology. Method A social return on investment analysis of home automation study was undertaken. Primary data were collected using qualitative interviews with home automation consumers and other key stakeholders, including occupational therapists, a spinal rehabilitation physician, peer support advocate, and managers and technical personnel from home automation providers (n = 17). The analysis was supported by (1) secondary data from a scoping review on outcomes from home automation and (2) additional literature searches to identify suitable financial proxies and to make estimates of the proportion of home automation users expected to experience each outcome. A scenario approach was used with three home automation scenarios developed with increasing complexity and costs to calculate the social return on investment. Results Eight outcomes from the use of home automation were identified, including reduced reliance on carers and family members, increased independence, and improved energy and comfort. The social return on investment ranged from 15.10 (high cost) for every $1 invested across a 10‐year benefit period, with the financial proxy for reduced care attendant hours contributing the most to the social return ratio. Even the highest cost scenario was repaid in social value within the first year of the benefit period. Conclusion This study suggests that home automation represents a sound investment and has a significant impact on the overall quality of life of people with disabilities. Focusing on the financial savings in care attendant hours alone should be compelling evidence for funders to recognise home automation's value and continue to fund this assistive technology. Consumer and Community Involvement A consumer representative was a member of the project steering group, which supported the research team at all stages of the project. Plain Language Summary When people get injured, their disability can stop them doing things around the home that they used to be able to do. Technology can help people with disabilities do things like open and close doors and turn off taps by pressing a button, so they do not have to wait for someone to help them. This technology can be expensive, but no one has looked at if it is worth the money. We spoke to some people with disabilities who used this type of technology, and they told us their lives were better now they used this technology. For example, they told us they were able to do things for themselves, they did not need carers as much, and they had better mental health. We spoke to businesses about the costs of different types of technology that can be used in the home. We then put a dollar value on the ways people with disabilities told us their lives were better. For example, for better mental health, we worked out how much it would cost to see a psychologist for 1 year. We found that the dollar value of the ways in which people with disabilities' lives were improved was at least 15 times more than the costs of the technology. This study therefore shows that this technology is worth the money and improves the lives of people with disabilities following serious injury.

A technology-focused service within a rehabilitation setting: exploring the experiences and current technology demands of people with disabilities

Health professionals' experiences and implications of a technology-focused service within a rehabilitation setting

Activity and MObility UsiNg Technology (AMOUNT) rehabilitation trial – description of device use and physiotherapy support in the post-hospital phase

Examining Usability, Acceptability, and Adoption of a Self-Directed, Technology-Based Intervention for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: Cohort Study

Exploring perspectives on assistive technology use: barriers, facilitators, and access

Cardiac Rehabilitees’ Technology Experiences Before Remote Rehabilitation: Qualitative Study Using a Grounded Theory Approach

Identification and assessment of Electronic Aids for Daily Living considered essential by persons with high level tetraplegia: a case series

An Intensive Exercise Program Using a Technology-Enriched Rehabilitation Gym for the Recovery of Function in People With Chronic Stroke: Usability Study

A Participatory Model for Cocreating Accessible Rehabilitation Technology for Stroke Survivors: User-Centered Design Approach

A Support Worker Perspective on Use of New Technologies by People with Intellectual Disabilities

The impact of a training intervention on knowledge, confidence and attitudes of professionals in a Community Acquired Brain Injury Service about assistive technology for cognition: a before and after survey

Uptake of Technology for Neurorehabilitation in Clinical Practice: A Scoping Review

"I'm Just Overwhelmed": Investigating Physical Therapy Accessibility and Technology Interventions for People with Disabilities and/or Chronic Conditions

Therapists’ Perceptions of Social Media and Video Game Technologies in Upper Limb Rehabilitation

Current State of Connected Sensor Technologies Used During Rehabilitation Care: Protocol for a Scoping Review

Digital personal assistants are smart ways for assistive technology to aid the health and wellbeing of patients and carers

Usability of affordable feedback-based technologies to improve mobility and physical activity in rehabilitation: a mixed methods study

Calculating the social impact of home automation for people with disability: A social return on investment study

Leveraging Emerging Technologies to Expand Accessibility and Improve Precision in Rehabilitation and Exercise for People with Disabilities

Patient experiences receiving rehabilitation care via telehealth: Identifying opportunities for remote care

Evaluation of a Physical Therapist-Delivered Technology Literacy Algorithm and Protocol for Older Adults: A Pilot Study