Studies in the epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in the Orkney and Shetland Islands
D. Poskanzer,A. M. Walker,Joanne Yonkondy,J. Sheridan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.26.6_Part_2.14
IF: 9.9
1976-06-01
Neurology
Abstract:No. 4 Studies in the epidemiology of multiple sclerosis in the Orkney and Shetland Islands DAVID C. POSKANZER, ALEXANDER M. WALKER, JOANNE YONKONDY, and JEAN L. SHERIDAN Department of Neurology, Harvard Medical School, Boston eginning 7 miles north of the northernmost B point in Scotland and extending 50 miles north northeastward lie the Orkney Islands, a group of about 70 islands, islets, and skerries, of which 25 are inhabited. The area of the Orkneys is 376 square miles with a population in 1971 of 17,137. The largest island is the Mainland with an area of 207 square miles, containing the two burghs, Kirkwall and Stromness, comprising 31 percent of the total population. Seventy percent of the population lives on the Mainland. The Shetland Islands, which lie an additional 40 miles north northeastward, at a latitude 60 to 61 degrees north, are a group of more than 100 islands, with the capitol at Lenvick, 300 miles north by east of Edinburgh and 220 miles west of Bergen, Norway. Kirkwall, Orkney and Lenvick, Shetland are separated by 100 miles. The total ’area of the Shetlands is 550 square miles with a population In 1971 of 17,535. There are 18 inhabited islands, including the Mainland with 378 square miles and 70 percent of the total population. The two groups of islands differ in many respects. Shetland is more rugged, and barely one-sixth is capable of cultivation. Because of the number of long sea inlets or voes, no spot in Shetland is more than 3 miles from the sea. Orkney, on the other hand, is low-lying and softly hilly. The land is arable and farming is the chief industry. Both sets of islands have a climate which is mainly moist and mild, despite the high north latitude, but annual hours of sunshine are 30 percent greater in Orkney. Because of high winds, both archipelagos are virtually treeless. The islands were annexed to Norway in the latter part of the ninth century but in 1468 were attached to Scotland as a pledge to the dowry of the Princess of Denmark who married James 111 of Scotland. Sutherland’ first pointed out that the prevalence of multiple sclerosis was about twice as high in the Shetland and Orkney region than in the Highland areas of Scotland. He drew attention particularly to the counties of Shetland and Orkney and Caithness, the northernmost mainland Scottish county. At the time his paper was published in 1956, only a handful of prevalence studies of multiple sclerosis had been carried out; and the pattern of geographical distribution was not clearly defined. Only later was it apparent that the areas pointed to by Sutherland not only had a high rate of multiple sclerosis but, in fact, had the highest prevalence of the disease of any area competently surveyed in the world. He postulated that there might be ‘‘a disadvantageous genetic factor” in this northeast area of Scotland, which is largely Scandinavian in origin, compared with the Celtic origin in individuals of the Hebrides Islands and the northwest of Scotland. In 1962, Allison, Fog, and Hyllested undertook a study of the occurrence of multiple sclerosis in the Orkney, Shetland, and Faroe Islands and again found the prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the Orkneys and Shetlands to be almost three times that recorded anywhere else in the world.*y3 In 1970, Poskanzer, Brody, and Plank visited the Shetland and Orkney Islands. The investigation was intended to confirm the high rate of prevalence previously recorded and to ascertain whether a continued high incidence of multiple sclerosis was present. It was hypothecated that perhaps those individuals who were well and able to emigrate had left the islands, leaving behind a much higher proportion of those incapacitated by neurologic illness. In this third survey, based on the evaluations of Allison, Fog, and Hyllested, all new 14 Neurology, June 1976 Part 2 Table 1. Multiple sclerosis Orkney Islands patients reported since 1962 were seen and examined. Second priority was given to patients previously diagnosed as possible or doubtful in 1962. The cu r ren t i nves t iga t ions , an ex tens ive epidemiologic, virologic, and genetic study of multiple sclerosis, were undertaken in 1974 to 1976 in the Shetland and Orkney island^.^ For this investigation, each case of multiple sclerosis in the Islands was reviewed and evaluated by a single individual and classified as “probable,” “possible,” or “not multiple sclerosis” according to established international criteria. For each case, a contiguous control was selected who was born in the same parish of the Islands in the same year and of the same sex and who had resided in the same area for the first 15 years of life. In addition, a discontiguous control was selected, born in the same year, of the same sex, but born in a parish not contiguous with that in which the patient himself was born. Evaluation included the patient and his family, the contiguous control and his family, and the discontiguous control alone. As a result of these four series of investigations, the two archipelagos represent one of two areas in the world (the other being OImsted County, Minnesota) where the prevalence of multiple sclerosis has been studied at four different points in time (tables 1 and 2). The surveys done in 1954, 1962, 1970, and 1974 disclose that the prevalence of multiple sclerosis has risen dramatically over time in the Orkney Islands, while the prevalence in the Shetland Islands, though demonstrating a slight increase, statistically is essentially unchanged over the four investigations. In 1954, the prevalence rate of multiple sclerosis in the Orkney Islands was 11 1/100,000, Table 2. Multiple sclerosis Shetland Islands US-Japan Conference on Multiple Sclerosis 15 rising to 309/100,000 in 1974. In the Shetland Islands, the prevalence rate rose from 134/100,000 in 1954 to 184/100,000 in 1974 (figure 1 ) . (The population figures given by Sutherland and Allison and the prevalence rates in their studies have been adjusted to the best available estimate of the population available from the Registrar General of Scotland for the prevalence day of their survey and, therefore, differ slightly from those appearing in their actual publications.) As illustrated in table 3, the incidence of the disease in Shetland and Orkney has been remarkably consistent by 5-year periods since 1941. The actual number of cases were 54 in Orkney and 34 in Shetland. In three instances, permission to see the patient was denied by the local practitioner because the patients had not yet been informed that they had multiple sclerosis. Under these circumstances, the cases are included in the tabulations as “possible” and no case not personally evaluated is listed as “probable.” The total number of female patients is 50 and male patients 38. The percent female is 56.8, which is similar to the figures available in the literature elsewhere. The mean age of onset in the Shetland Islands is 29.0 years, as compared with 33.6 in Orkney, a statistically significant difference. Investigations of the reasons for the progressive increase in the prevalence rate of multiple sclerosis in Orkney suggest that an increased life expectancy among patients contributed heavily, though consideration was given to the possibility that the high rate in both Orkney and Shetland was the result of immigration o r reimmigration to the Islands of patients with multiple sclerosis because of provision of full medical care by the National Health Service and the support from extended family groups in these essentially rural areas. Careful anamnesis of the patients and their families disclosed only one patient who returned to the Islands because of the development of multiple sclerosis. The patterns of immigration and emigration were examined by Taylor, Illsley. and Poskanzer’ who concluded that, though migration differentials between sick and healthy individuals have been reported for other diseases, the effect of such differentials alone could not produce the difference in prevalence rates reported in Orkney and Shetland. A number of etiologic hypotheses have been derived from epidemiologic studies of multiple sclerosis over the past 25 years. Beginning with the work of Kurland in 19512~ and reviewed extensively by Acheson (McAlpine, Acheson, and Lumsden),’ a remarkable but still unexplained geographic pattern has emerged. In both northern and southern hemispheres, the rates are several times higher in the temperate zones (about 30 to 60 degrees latitude) than in the tropics or subtropics. Although it has been generally agreed that an exogenous factor may be implicated to explain these epidemiologic findings, it is equally likely that some endogenous factor also plays a role in determining which patients exposed to a particular exogenous factor are susceptible to the disease or develop i t . The frequencies of histocompatibility 0 0 8 9