Abstract:OBJECTIVES: It is difficult to "prove" pain and suffering-particularly emotional suffering. Neuroimaging technology might bolster pain claims in civil cases by making pain seem less subjective. We examined how neuroimaging of physical and emotional pain influences judgments of pain and suffering across nonlegal and legal contexts.HYPOTHESES: We hypothesized that participants would rate pain assessed using neuroimaging as more severe and award higher compensation than pain assessed using self-report measures. We also hypothesized that participants would rate physical (vs. emotional) pain as more severe, except when the pain claim was bolstered by a neuroimaging assessment.METHOD: In two experiments, we tested how pain assessment techniques influence perceptions of pain severity and monetary compensation differently for physical or emotional pain. Using a within-subjects design, participants (Experiment 1, N = 411, 59% male, 80% White) read 6 vignettes that described a person's chronic physical or emotional pain, evaluated using a clinical assessment, neuropsychological assessment, or neuroimaging assessment. We conceptually replicated Experiment 1 in a legal context (Experiment 2, N = 353, 42% male; 80% White) and tested whether the neuroimaging effect was due to knowing that the pain was assessed by neuroimaging or also required the inclusion of a neuroimage.RESULTS: When pain was assessed using neuroimaging (vs. non-neuroimaging assessments), participants rated the pain as more severe and gave larger monetary awards. When a person alleged physical (vs. emotional) pain, participants rated the pain as more severe and gave larger monetary awards. We conceptually replicated these findings in Experiment 2 and found that the neuroimaging effect was due to hearing about neuroimaging assessment and did not necessitate the inclusion of a neuroimage.CONCLUSION: Neuroimaging technology could be extremely useful for plaintiffs trying to overcome the difficult hurdle of proving their pain. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved).

Healthcare experience affects pain-specific responses to others' suffering in the anterior insula

Incidental Physical Pain Reduces Brain Activities Associated with Affective Social Feedback and Increases Aggression.

Intergroup Relationship and Empathy for Others’ Pain: A Social Neuroscience Approach

Empathy for Pain Involves the Affective but not Sensory Components of Pain

Expertise Modulates Students’ Perception of Pain From a Self-Perspective: Quasi-Experimental Study

Attention and reality constraints on the neural processes of empathy for pain.

Cross-modal representations of first-hand and vicarious pain, disgust and fairness in insular and cingulate cortex

Cultural Experiences Reduce Racial Bias in Neural Responses to Others’ Suffering

Brain responses to the vicarious facilitation of pain by facial expressions of pain and fear

Empathic neural responses to others' pain are modulated by emotional contexts.

Linking Brain Structure and Activation in Anterior Insula Cortex to Explain the Trait Empathy for Pain.

Pain experience reduces social avoidance to others in pain: a c-Fos-based functional connectivity network study in mice

Task Modulations of Racial Bias in Neural Responses to Others' Suffering

Neuronal activation patterns during self-referential pain imagination

Brain-to-brain mechanisms underlying pain empathy and social modulation of pain in the patient-clinician interaction

Racial Bias in Neural Response for Pain Is Modulated by Minimal Group.

Can neuroimaging prove pain and suffering?: The influence of pain assessment techniques on legal judgments of physical versus emotional pain.

Do you feel my pain? Racial group membership modulates empathic neural responses.

Sensory-specific predictive models in the human anterior insula

The Neural Substrate of Human Empathy: Effects of Perspective-taking and Cognitive Appraisal

Ongoing first-hand pain facilitates somatosensory resonance but inhibits affective sharing in empathy for pain