1087 Recognizing Sleep Disorders in the US Military Health System: Differences Between On-base and Private Sector Care
Vincent Capaldi,Scott Williams,Connie Thomas,Jeph Herrin,Allison Hong,Wendy Funk,Jacob Collen,Benoit Stryckman,Jennifer Albrecht,Emerson Wickwire
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsae067.01087
IF: 6.313
2024-04-20
SLEEP
Abstract:Abstract Introduction Sleep disorders such as insomnia and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) are common and costly in the US Military Health System (MHS). Further, demand for sleep specialty care greatly exceeds available supply. Many MHS beneficiaries are referred off-base to the TRICARE network to access private sector care. The purpose of this study was to compare military, demographic, and clinical characteristics between MHS beneficiaries newly diagnosed with either insomnia or OSA on-base (direct care) and off-base (private sector care). Methods We identified MHS beneficiaries with a first diagnosis of insomnia or OSA between years 2016-2021 within the Military Data Repository (MDR). This large data repository includes encounter, procedure, medication, and durable medical equipment information for Active Duty personnel, dependents, National Guard, and Reserves. Demographic and military information was obtained from the MDR. Sleep disorders and medical and psychiatric comorbidities were defined based on ICD-10 diagnostic codes. Determination of direct vs private sector care was based on an indicator in the MDR. Results 235,823 MHS beneficiaries were diagnosed with either insomnia (n=143,877) or OSA (n=91,946). Of beneficiaries with insomnia, the majority (n=119,923, 83.4%) were diagnosed in direct care. Of beneficiaries with OSA, the majority (n=51,014, 55.5%) were diagnosed in private sector care. Between-groups differences (direct vs private sector care) were observed in service branch (standard mean difference [SMD]=0.46) and beneficiary category (i.e., Active Duty, dependent, National Guard, or Reserve; SMD=0.37), with most Active Duty (n=131,321, 81.6%) and dependent (n=26,987, 53.5%) beneficiaries being treated via direct care. No between-groups differences were observed in medical and psychiatric comorbidities. In terms of comorbid sleep disorders, of beneficiaries diagnosed with hypersomnia (n=12,403), the majority (n=10,055, 81.1%) were diagnosed in private sector care. Conclusion Differences in service branch and beneficiary category were observed between individuals diagnosed with insomnia or OSA in direct and private sector care. Insomnia was more likely to be diagnosed in direct care, and OSA was more likely to be diagnosed in private sector care. Future research should examine health and economic outcomes associated with direct and private sector sleep care and identify opportunities (e.g., telehealth) to bring sleep care back into the MHS. Support (if any) DoD HT94022210006.
neurosciences,clinical neurology