Abstract:Background Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy (MIPD) has been gradually attempted. However, whether MIPD is superior, equal or inferior to its conventional open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) is not clear. Methods Studies published up to May 2017 were searched in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. Main outcomes were comprehensively reviewed and measured including conversion to open approach, operation time (OP), estimated blood loss (EBL), transfusion, length of hospital stay (LOS), overall complications, postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF), delayed gastric emptying (DGE), post-pancreatectomy hemorrhage (PPH), readmission, reoperation and reasons of preoperative death, number of retrieved lymph nodes (RLN), surgical margins, recurrence, and survival. The software of Review Manage version 5.1 was used for meta-analysis. Results One hundred studies were included for systematic review and 26 out of them (totally 3402 cases, 1064 for MIPD, 2338 for OPD) were included for meta-analysis. In the early years, most articles were case reports or non-control case series studies, while in the last 6 years high-volume and comparative researches were increasing gradually. Systematic review revealed conversion rates of MIPD to OPD ranged from 0% to 40%. The mean or median OP of MIPD ranged from 276 to 657 min. The total POPF rates vary between 3.8% and 50% observed in all systematic reviewed studies. Meta-analysis demonstrated MIPD had longer OP (WMD = 99.4 min; 95%CI: 46.0 ~ 152.8, P < 0.01), lower blood loss (WMD = −0.54 ml; 95% CI, −0.88 ~ −0.20 ml; P < 0.01), lower transfusion rate (RR = 0.73, 95%CI: 0.57 ~ 0.94, P = 0.02), shorter LOS (WMD = −3.49 days; 95%CI: -4.83 ~ −2.15, P < 0.01). There was no significant difference in time to oral intake, postoperative complications, POPF, reoperation, readmission, perioperative mortality and number of retrieved lymph nodes. Conclusion Our study demonstrates MIPD is technically feasible and safety on the basis of historical studies. MIPD is associated with less blood loss, faster postoperative recovery, shorter length of hospitalization and longer operation time. These findings are waiting for being confirmed with robust prospective comparative studies and randomized clinical trials.

Minimally Invasive Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery at a Large Regional Health System: Assessing the Safety of Program Expansion

Minimally invasive pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary disease: a comprehensive review of literature and meta-analysis of outcomes compared with open surgery

Expanding Laparoscopic Pancreaticoduodenectomy to Pancreatic-Head and Periampullary Malignancy: Major Findings Based on Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: ensuring safety with implementation

Evolution Of Laparoscopic Pancreatic Resections For Pancreatic And Periampullary Diseases: Perioperative Outcomes Of 605 Patients At A High-Volume Center

Laparoscopic versus open hepatic resection in patients ≥75 years old: A NSQIP analysis evaluating 2674 patients

Current progress in robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery at a high‐volume center

Institutional First 100 Case Experience and Outcomes of Robotic Hepatectomy for Liver Tumors

Assessment of mechanical bowel preparation prior to nephrectomy in the minimally invasive surgery era: insights from a national database analysis in the United States

Implementing a robotic hepatopancreatobiliary program for new faculty: safety, feasibility and lessons learned

Advancing minimally invasive hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: barriers to adoption and equitable access

MILS in a general surgery unit: learning curve, indications, and limitations

Robotic hepatectomy for benign and malignant liver tumors

Performance evaluation of a North American center using the established global benchmark for laparoscopic liver resections: A retrospective study

A Comparative Analysis of Open Versus Minimally Invasive Pancreatoduodenectomies

Multicentre evaluation of case volume in minimally invasive hepatectomy

Not just a BLiP: early experience with a novel multidisciplinary case conference for benign hepatopancreatobiliary disease at a tertiary Canadian healthcare center

Single-Institution Early Experience and Learning Curve with Robotic Liver Resections

Robotic hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery: lessons learned and predictors for conversion

A "cui prodest" evaluation on the development of a minimally invasive liver surgery program: a differential benefit analysis of open and laparoscopic approach for left and right hemihepatectomies

Comparing Outcomes of Minimally Invasive and Open Hepatectomy for Primary Liver Malignancies in Patients with Low-MELD Cirrhosis