An end-to-end workflow for non-destructive 3D pathology

Kevin W Bishop,Lindsey A Erion Barner,Qinghua Han,Elena Baraznenok,Lydia Lan,Chetan Poudel,Gan Gao,Robert B Serafin,Sarah S L Chow,Adam K Glaser,Andrew Janowczyk,David Brenes,Hongyi Huang,Dominie Miyasato,Lawrence D True,Soyoung Kang,Joshua C Vaughan,Jonathan T C Liu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.08.03.551845
2023-08-06
bioRxiv
Abstract:Recent advances in 3D pathology offer the ability to image orders-of-magnitude more tissue than conventional pathology while providing a volumetric context that is lacking with 2D tissue sections, all without requiring destructive tissue sectioning. Generating high-quality 3D pathology datasets on a consistent basis is non-trivial, requiring careful attention to many details regarding tissue preparation, imaging, and data/image processing in an iterative process. Here we provide an end-to-end protocol covering all aspects of a 3D pathology workflow (using light-sheet microscopy as an illustrative imaging platform) with sufficient detail to perform well-controlled preclinical and clinical studies. While 3D pathology is compatible with diverse staining protocols and computationally generated color palettes for visual analysis, this protocol will focus on a fluorescent analog of hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), which remains the most common stain for gold-standard diagnostic determinations. We present our guidelines for a broad range of end-users (e.g., biologists, clinical researchers, and engineers) in a simple tutorial format.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?