Cobalt‐induced anaphylaxis, contact urticaria, and delayed allergy in a ceramics decorator

B. Kręcisz,M. Kieć-Świerczyńska,Patrycja Krawczyk,Dorota Chomiczewska,C. Pałczyński
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01465.x
2009-03-01
Contact Dermatitis
Abstract:A 39-year-old non-atopic woman, employed as a ceramics decorator from 2000, developed eczematous skin lesions on the back of her hands and forearms 3 months after starting thework. The conditionwas recurrent but disappeared during prolonged periods off work. After 5 years of working, she developedgeneralizedurticaria; angioedema of the face, lips, and tongue and general fatigue after using the blue paint containing cobalt chloride (Glass and Ceramics Institute, Warsaw, Poland). She was moved to a different job at the same factory, and all the symptoms receded. In 2007, (i) she was patch tested with the European baseline series of contact allergens (Chemotechnique Diagnostics, Malmö, Sweden) according to International Contact Dermatitis Research Group criteria; (ii) she was prick tested with common aeroallergens (commercial kit; Allergopharma, Reinbek, Germany); (iii) she was prick tested with cobalt chloride (1 and 0.1 mg CoCl2/ml), potassium dichromate (1 and 0.1 mgK2CrO4/ml) and nickel sulfate (10 and 1 mg NiSO4/ml) dissolved in water and performed as described by Kanerva et al. (2), the same tests with metals were also performed in 10 healthy volunteers; (iv) serum samples from the patient were analysed for metalspecific immnoglobulin E (IgE) using the HY-TEC specific and total IgE enzyme immunoassay (Hycor Biomedical Inc., Irvine, CA, USA); and (v) a challenge test with the patient painting pottery using the blue paint containing cobalt chloride from the workplace was carried out. Patch tests showed reactions to cobalt chloride and nickel sulfate (both þþþ at 2 and 4 days). Prick testswere negativewith commonaeroallergens, potassium dichromate and nickel sulfate, whereas positive with cobalt chloride (both 1 and 0.1 mg/ml dilutions). All prick tests with metals were negative in the healthy volunteers. The level of cobalt-specific IgE was 2.97 IU/ml (class 2), while chromiumor nickel-specific IgE was not found in patient’s serum. The challenge test was also positive. After 30 min of painting, the patient developed the first symptoms of urticaria: thewheals appearedonherhands and forearms, followed by oedema of her face, lips, and tongue and hands 20 min later (Figs. 1 and 2). Despite stopping exposure, an anaphylactic reaction developed over the next 30 min: blood pressure fall (from 120/ 80 mmHg to 80/60 mm Hg); tachycardia 110/min (75/min before challenge) andpale skinwith sweating, abdominal cramps, nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea and dizziness. After administration of intravenous corticosteroids, the symptoms receded.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?